It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussion (archive)Why is Alice never in the RE games?(87 posts)(87 posts)
(87 posts)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
This is my favourite topic
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
GameRager: And c'mon...what's not to like about a beutiful woman that kicks zombie ass? :D
avatar
AlKim: Apart from the facts that most of the time the editing is so bad you can't possibly have a clue as to what's going on and that occasionally the sound recording equipment was either misplaced or missing altogether, nothing.
Well see there's your problem....you're viewing the film from the eye of an Academy judge(Oscars)...give it back to the poor bloke and watch it with a few dudes and some beer.
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
AlKim: Apart from the facts that most of the time the editing is so bad you can't possibly have a clue as to what's going on and that occasionally the sound recording equipment was either misplaced or missing altogether, nothing.
avatar
GameRager: Well see there's your problem....you're viewing the film from the eye of an Academy judge(Oscars)...give it back to the poor bloke and watch it with a few dudes and some beer.
I did have friends around. Didn't help, that. About halfway through the movie we drew straws to choose who'd go out and buy another case of beer; the film was so terrible we had gone through the brew faster than expected. I hoped I'd draw the shortest straw so I could get out, have a few cigarettes, walk to a shop a very long way away and return after the movie ended. Unfortunately I didn't.

Look, the film has got some pretty rubbish reviews and there's a very good reason for that: it's shit.
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
GameRager: Well see there's your problem....you're viewing the film from the eye of an Academy judge(Oscars)...give it back to the poor bloke and watch it with a few dudes and some beer.
avatar
AlKim: I did have friends around. Didn't help, that. About halfway through the movie we drew straws to choose who'd go out and buy another case of beer; the film was so terrible we had gone through the brew faster than expected. I hoped I'd draw the shortest straw so I could get out, have a few cigarettes, walk to a shop a very long way away and return after the movie ended. Unfortunately I didn't.

Look, the film has got some pretty rubbish reviews and there's a very good reason for that: it's shit.
I liked it. :\ SO did other people.

Also reviews aren't always subjective...most are biased and alot of "critics" like to bash stuff rather than praise it to get more support and fans. Of course the opposite can also happen....just stating my point at any rate.
Post edited January 23, 2012 by GameRager
Posted January 23, 2012
Please no.
The movies have already gone irreversibly down the shitter.
Even though the quality of the games severely deteriorated after #3, there's no need to make them even worse.
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Please no.
The movies have already gone irreversibly down the shitter.
Even though the quality of the games severely deteriorated after #3, there's no need to make them even worse.
I also liked RE4(never played 5).....I don't get why people dislike action horror games. It's not the same as the originals but fun in it's own way.
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Please no.
The movies have already gone irreversibly down the shitter.
Even though the quality of the games severely deteriorated after #3, there's no need to make them even worse.
avatar
GameRager: I also liked RE4(never played 5).....I don't get why people dislike action horror games. It's not the same as the originals but fun in it's own way.
Because everything is action these days. If I want an action game, I can think of thousand that are infinitely better. I wouldn't called RE4 'horror' either. The horror in the originals came from the survival aspects. One zombie in RE was infinitely scarier than 50 in RE4.
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
GameRager: I also liked RE4(never played 5).....I don't get why people dislike action horror games. It's not the same as the originals but fun in it's own way.
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Because everything is action these days. If I want an action game, I can think of thousand that are infinitely better. I wouldn't called RE4 'horror' either. The horror in the originals came from the survival aspects. One zombie in RE was infinitely scarier than 50 in RE4.
Action survival then.
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Because everything is action these days. If I want an action game, I can think of thousand that are infinitely better. I wouldn't called RE4 'horror' either. The horror in the originals came from the survival aspects. One zombie in RE was infinitely scarier than 50 in RE4.
avatar
GameRager: Action survival then.
Hey if RE4 is 'survival', then so is any game that includes stuff that kills you.
That's like calling CoD a 'survival FPS'.
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
GameRager: Action survival then.
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Hey if RE4 is 'survival', then so is any game that includes stuff that kills you.
That's like calling CoD a 'survival FPS'.
Well if you have to survive something then by definition it is a survival game. Some are more "hardcore" than others though, obviously.
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Hey if RE4 is 'survival', then so is any game that includes stuff that kills you.
That's like calling CoD a 'survival FPS'.
avatar
GameRager: Well if you have to survive something then by definition it is a survival game. Some are more "hardcore" than others though, obviously.
That's ingenious. I never thought of that.
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
GameRager: Well if you have to survive something then by definition it is a survival game. Some are more "hardcore" than others though, obviously.
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: That's ingenious. I never thought of that.
Oh cut the sarcasm....yer blowing the meter off the charts here bub.
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Hey if RE4 is 'survival', then so is any game that includes stuff that kills you.
That's like calling CoD a 'survival FPS'.
avatar
GameRager: Well if you have to survive something then by definition it is a survival game. Some are more "hardcore" than others though, obviously.
Uh, no. Survival horror is a subgenre of horror, but horror isn't a subgenre of survival. There really isn't such a survival genre. If you want to be ridiculous about it, then yes, removing "horror" from "survival horror" does leave "survival", and adding "action" results in "action survival", but that's not how things work.
Post edited January 23, 2012 by AlKim
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
GameRager: Well if you have to survive something then by definition it is a survival game. Some are more "hardcore" than others though, obviously.
avatar
AlKim: Uh, no. Survival horror is a subgenre of horror, but horror isn't a subgenre of survival. There really isn't such a survival genre. If you want to be ridiculous about it, then yes, removing "horror" from "survival horror" does leave "survival", and adding "action" results in "action survival", but that's not how things work.
And why isn't that how things work? Do you write up all the definitions for the various genres of media out there?

I never said horror was a subgenre of survival......I did however say that there can be survival action games.
Post edited January 23, 2012 by GameRager
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Please no.
The movies have already gone irreversibly down the shitter.
Even though the quality of the games severely deteriorated after #3, there's no need to make them even worse.
I agree. They knew they had fucked up the moment they had an army of thousands of Alices, all of them with ESP. So what did they do? They killed them off and remove the original Alice's powers as a desperate attempt to "fix" the plot. That didn't save the last movie from being shittier than its predecessors though.
IMO RE4 was a good game in spite of being a completely different kind of game than 1 to 3. It still had some survival aspects but RE5 succeeded in removing the series from the survival genre and basically turned it into a 3D Contra game (complete with co-op). I still liked it enough to finish it. Mainly because of the plot and because it involved Chris, Jill, and Wesker which haven't been seen in a while.
Post edited January 23, 2012 by OmegaX
Posted January 23, 2012
avatar
OmegaX: snip
Heh thanks for reminding me of the plot. Saw it when it first came out in the cinemas and didn't recall a thing initially. That's how forgettable of an experience it was. Utter garbage.
I like zombie themes. Unfortunately, the Resident Evil movies are no more about zombies than Superman is about common street thugs. The entire series is about superheroes and supervillains, good guys vs bad guys. Ironically enough, there's no world left to save though. But that's one thing that zombie movies have in common - they're all stupid and they suck. I wish somebody made a decent zombie movie one of these days.

As for the games, I agree with you on the basis that aren't necessarily bad as such. I suppose they are simply yet another step in the inevitable evolution of video gaming. The next series is bound to not only include even more action and spesshul powwas but also more thongs and bras!
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussion (archive)Why is Alice never in the RE games?(87 posts)(87 posts)
(87 posts)