It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussion (archive)THQ is struggling.(130 posts)(130 posts)
(130 posts)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
This is my favourite topic
Posted February 02, 2012
avatar
Fred_DM: i don't understand why you put GoG in the same category as Steam and Origin. GoG.com is not required in anyway to play the games you've purchased on there. you can buy games on GoG.com, back them up and never come back. install and play anytime anywhere whether GoG.com still exists or not.
I'm just talking about "account based game librarys". I like it, as I don't like keeping back ups. Edit: And Origin, for the most part, doesn't require you to be online neither, as does Steam.
avatar
keeveek: Pure Pc games are console ports since when... ?
Shooter being "consolified" has been around since the Xbox hit the market (thanks a lot Halo :-( ! ). Shooters haven't been "a pure PC genre" since then. And yes it sucks big time.

Shooters are for the most part "mainstream games" for which publishers want the biggest, easiest target group imagninable, hence consoles.
Post edited February 02, 2012 by SimonG
Posted February 02, 2012
Ok, I got your point, but I can hardly recall any recent Ubisoft game that can be called "pure pc title" ...
Posted February 02, 2012
avatar
keeveek: Ok, I got your point, but I can hardly recall any recent Ubisoft game that can be called "pure pc title" ...
Are you actually reading my post! ;-P

The whole Anno series (yes they had console versions but those were developed independently from the PC versions and those were as pure and complex as PC gaming can get). Same goes for the settlers series.

Which is more than I can say for any other AAA publisher.
Posted February 02, 2012
Ok, Anno and Settlers suit the description for me.
Posted February 02, 2012
avatar
keeveek: Ok, Anno and Settlers suit the description for me.
RUSE as well. it wasn't PC-exclusive, but it was clearly a PC game. nobody played it on consoles anyway.
Posted February 02, 2012
avatar
keeveek: Ok, Anno and Settlers suit the description for me.
avatar
Fred_DM: RUSE as well. it wasn't PC-exclusive, but it was clearly a PC game. nobody played it on consoles anyway.
Because consoleros didn't need the mouse for which the game was bought mainly on the PC ;-P. Actually I've never played it, as I've played enough WW2 RTS to last me a lifetime (or till CoH 2).
Posted February 02, 2012
avatar
Fred_DM: RUSE as well. it wasn't PC-exclusive, but it was clearly a PC game. nobody played it on consoles anyway.
avatar
SimonG: Because consoleros didn't need the mouse for which the game was bought mainly on the PC ;-P. Actually I've never played it, as I've played enough WW2 RTS to last me a lifetime (or till CoH 2).
It's actually a pretty good concept for a game you can't see what a unit is unless it's in sight of one of your units or even where it is if it's the right type... at the same time you can also send fake units (think lorries done up as tanks etc etc) to use a feints etc the game idea is really well thought out unfortunately some of the implementation isn't :S
Posted February 02, 2012
avatar
wodmarach: It's actually a pretty good concept for a game you can't see what a unit is unless it's in sight of one of your units or even where it is if it's the right type... at the same time you can also send fake units (think lorries done up as tanks etc etc) to use a feints etc the game idea is really well thought out unfortunately some of the implementation isn't :S
Maybe I'm old, but isn't that usual for RTS ;-P. (the underlined part)

I never tried it or even made a closer observation, so I can't really judge the game. It just looked like it's not my cup of tea.
Posted February 02, 2012
here's something on UbiSoft's DRM:

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/02/02/legitimate-ubisoft-games-wont-work-tues/

that's just great, isn't it? we're talking about singleplayer games here. the idiocy is beyond my grasp.
Posted February 02, 2012
avatar
Fred_DM: here's something on UbiSoft's DRM:

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/02/02/legitimate-ubisoft-games-wont-work-tues/

that's just great, isn't it? we're talking about singleplayer games here. the idiocy is beyond my grasp.
Ok, that is just shitty business practise. No arguments from me on this. That shouldn't be happening. (BUT Settlers 7 has an offline mode, that I already used)
Posted February 02, 2012
avatar
wodmarach: It's actually a pretty good concept for a game you can't see what a unit is unless it's in sight of one of your units or even where it is if it's the right type... at the same time you can also send fake units (think lorries done up as tanks etc etc) to use a feints etc the game idea is really well thought out unfortunately some of the implementation isn't :S
avatar
SimonG: Maybe I'm old, but isn't that usual for RTS ;-P. (the underlined part)

I never tried it or even made a closer observation, so I can't really judge the game. It just looked like it's not my cup of tea.
nono this is slightly different because you CAN see units in the fog of war but not WHAT they are (you get a token marking their position) and since you can fake those tokens you have to decide if it's a feint or a real incoming tank battalion etc etc...
Posted February 02, 2012
avatar
wodmarach: nono this is slightly different because you CAN see units in the fog of war but not WHAT they are (you get a token marking their position) and since you can fake those tokens you have to decide if it's a feint or a real incoming tank battalion etc etc...
Didn't Supreme Commander have jammers which created fake radar contacts?
Posted February 02, 2012
avatar
wodmarach: nono this is slightly different because you CAN see units in the fog of war but not WHAT they are (you get a token marking their position) and since you can fake those tokens you have to decide if it's a feint or a real incoming tank battalion etc etc...
avatar
grviper: Didn't Supreme Commander have jammers which created fake radar contacts?
You can make entirely fake HQ's in ruse if you have the right ability on hand
Posted February 02, 2012
T.....H......Q-uuuuuhhhh!!!

#Falls to the floor and dies#
Posted February 02, 2012
Good time to buy stock.
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussion (archive)THQ is struggling.(130 posts)(130 posts)
(130 posts)