GameRager: I agree but i'm guessing black hole theory won't be of much use in our or our's grandchildren's lifetimes.
crazy_dave: Well ... except for CERN destroying the Earth :P
as a completely totally unrelated aside :), Hawking Radiation is one of the many, many reasons the nano-black holes created by CERN are benign
Forgot that one....yeah there's that to watch out for....;)
But imo, with or without hawking the nano-scale black holes wouldn't be any less "bening"....he just postulated the theory is all.
GameRager: I agree on most of this, but there's a big difference in terms of practicality/application between higher theoretical sciences like black hole theory and science better put to practical use like in the design of computers/etc.
LordCinnamon: Science doesn't work that way.
Fundamental science tries to understand. This isn't just something to keep us busy or satisfy our curiosity. With understanding comes the ability to predict, manipulate and emulate. Without this understanding, there is no `applied science', since there is no science at all.
You didn't get what I meant.
Basically I meant that one set of current sciences is useful to us practically right now, while the other isn't so much in terms of usability by the common man. Yes black hole physics may become useful at some point, but certainly not for quite some time.
LordCinnamon: Nah,understanding how the universe itself works. What use could that ever be? :)
Can it make me a flying car or quantum teleport me a bagel? No, not now?
Point, set, match.