tfishell: some people will
steal and instead GOG pursues the
honest folks
(emphasis mine)
wat
Do I need to post that piglet cartoon?
Legally, there's no difference between downloading software that's currently sold and that's currently not being sold. You know you don't have permission, you're making copies, it's not 70 years old -> illegal.
Morally, rightsholders of abandonware and ex-abandonware deserve
dick. Copyright allegedly exists to
benefit the creation of new art. You might make a convincing case for paying for indie games that are currently being sold (and that you like) so that the proceeds can
fund the creation of a new game by the same people. If it's not the case, there's nothing
morally wrong whatsoever with making an
illegal copy, no matter if the game is sold or not and by whom.
Now, I buy games on GOG, and I haven't played a pirated game in like 7 years. Why?
Because GOG provides a service: they curate my game collection. They host the files, provide fast downloads on demand whenever and wherever, they package installers, fix bugs, host the community, provide metadata, additional recommendations on improving my gaming experience, and thoughtful advice on expanding my collection. That's a valuable service that I'm willing to pay for. The fact that some of my money goes to the assorted cultural squatters and leeches is
unfortunate, but it's the only way GOG can actually have a legal business providing the service.
And I will never understand people who complain about GOG and ex-abandonware. They used to be able to illegally download amateur-made game packages that weren't guaranteed to work. Now they can illegally download shiny polished installers that have much better chances of working OR legally download the same installers and receive lifetime hosting and tech support service for a small one-time fee, OR download the same old amateur-made packages but from another site, and regardless of the option they choose, they
also have a bonus in the form of a more or less active community generating all sorts of metadata. That's an all-around win regardless of your opinion on copyright. Are they luddite hipsters, sad because their precious secret favorites that only they knew how to run and to appreciate are being fished out of the collective memory hole and distributed to the philistines who might have never seen a dos prompt?