korell: If you could get Valve games without Steam, would you avoid Steam completely?
One of the things I have an issue with about Steam is that it acts as a service for gaming, a digital distribution service and as DRM. Three things in one!
I don't want the service, I don't use their store, and I don't like DRM. So I choose to avoid Steam where I can, but this is occasionally impossible if you want to play certain games.
Totally agree, which is why I've stopped using it and abandoned games I bought on it.
Luckily, I've picked up games I had on it dirt cheap.
My biggest gripe is that the client is too controlling. With Sins of a Solar Empire, I can install the Impulse client, use it to install Sins, exit and never need to use it again (until maybe for an update). With Steam, you need to use it every single time you play a game (whether in offline mode or not).
Impulse is a good example of a client-based service, but unless they start having cheaper games or open up certain games to my region, I'm not going to use it again.
Direct2Drive and EA's store are good examples of non client based services. D2D has a downloader you may or may not use to download your games. EA's downloader is mandatory to download, but since I recently did a PC reinstall I was fine installing my EA games without it installed.
Simple, client-less game purchasing is all I personally want.
Edit:
Also, bear in mind Steam specifically does not allow you to transfer games to other people, whereas EA's terms state "You may make a one time permanent transfer to all your rights to install and use the Software to another individual...provided that...the Technical Protection Measures used by the Software supports such transfers"