When i don't like a particular style I don't feel the need to tell everyone, I tend to keep my mouth shut and simply move along.

Okay, so expressing one's negative stance means being an idiot. Thanks for the lesson.

You could have just said 'Doesn't look interesting to me' or something neutral, but no, you had to say something in an arrogant, dismissive fashion. I call idiot for unneccessarily tactless comment. Also, your followup comment shows that you do have a problem with the genre because if you even had the slightest clue about the game you wouldn't have made a baseless 'sexualization' comment.

Dear GOG staff, please remove any games that have anthropomorphized animals or other beings from these two users' game lists. This includes RPGs, platformers, puzzle games, adventure games, and whatnot.

Since they obviously hate them for their appearance instead of judging the games for what they are, I don't think they'd mind.

Wub,
Foxhack

Dude, you're really overly sensitive. You react to a slightly provoking way of expressing my own opinion and describing my reaction as if it was an insult or direct assault on someone's personality. I did not say (or even think) "all people who like this game suffer from zoophilia" or "you've gotta be a manchild with no life to be a fan of this". If I had said that I'd totally get why you're calling me an idiot but in this case you're just misinterpreting and overreacting.

I didn't deny having a problem with the genre (whatever the genre might be). I think very lowly of replacing all characters with animals for no good reason and then adding human sexual features to them. I generally accuse manga and anime of sexism and thoughtless (or sometimes downright perverted) sexualization and IMO it gets disturbing once it involves mixing humans with animals. , [url=http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRPv4-EnSmmQ7dxSUQlNLUpQXHkqCG444uyAo4-T6IX7e4BfImSjVqhfSDLsA]this and is in my opinion tasteless. I honestly believe that the majority of the artists and fans instantly think of [url=http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/279/e/e/solatorobo_girls_by_bbmbbf-d5gy87s.jpg]this. Boobs, provoking clothing, features of under-age girls - yeah, no senseless sexualization here, it's all about sophisticated metaphores and making serious topics more accessible to children... my ass.

First of all: Please don't call me "Furry", thanks

Second: Correct me if I'm wrong but from what I know and remember, I don't remember Solatorobo being marketed specifically to any "demographic" or ages, Solatorobo (just like many other games) is a game for "Everyone" and it can be enjoyed by "Everyone", there is a difference between a game for "Kids" and a game "For everyone"

Third: The reason I used the word "Immature" was because of yours and others very negative reactions simply because of the theme of the game and the main character. Refusing to play a good game, simply because you label it as "Furry" (whatever the hell that means) is pretty immature in my opinion, sorry if it offends you so much but that's the way I see it.

I still love it how you guys see some kind of attack here. You almost react as if someone had attacked you because of your sexuality or religion. Guys, just let it go, just accept the fact that others don't think kindly of the stuff you're into. :P
Please re-read our previous posts. Neither of us said that there's anything wrong with anthropomorphism in general.
Dude, there's nothing immature about disliking certain styles or genres - nobody can like everything. And we (or at least I) did not dismiss the possibility of the game having any positive features. All I said through my comment was that the presentation the artists chose is a total turn-off to me. What's immature is reacting that way to criticism - it was not a comment about any of you, just something you guys like and technically only one aspect of it.

It's quite unfair to bring adult fan-art into the discussion of a game, it has no impact on the product itself, you should judge games individually, on their own merits and not the actions of the more crazy/obsessive sides of their fanbases.

People will sexualize everything, no matter how wholesome. With the exception of the last link in your rebuttal, I would argue that you yourself are projecting obscenity onto some pretty innocuous images.

Finally no, the characters are not animals for no good reason, they are a stylistic choice by the developer, it is also a spiritual sequel to an old PSX game and is set in the same continuity. You'll also find most people who have played and enjoyed this game through, even people I know personally who aren't really interested in anthropomorphism, tend to agree that the characters here belong in this world, that it all gels seamlessly and believably and it wouldn't have felt the same without them. Not to mention the game's entire plot revolves around what they are.

ooohhhhh Roman5 your such a character!

Ehh, I'm probably at fault here. I only really skimmed through the posts once people started calling each other idiots so I didn't take the time to process the tone of what you guys were trying to say.
I'm pretty sure the main reason people are being so defensive about it is because of the first couple of posts in the topic that dismiss the original poster's first post without giving much reason other than "Oh it's furries. Closed.". While it is a public forum and you're not required to give a reason as to why you dislike someone, people do like to know why you're disliking what they like, even if they argue and yell at you all the while.

Then again, I could be missing the entire point and this entire thread was an elaborate ruse. Oh well.

You are a fan of a furry game. That's what I called you.
No, there isn't. Especially with reviews like: Disregard and dismissal is not "very negative". "Go die in a fire" is very negative. Thin skin much?

Definition of furry. Wikipedia is the best place to look for dictionary definitions. As an adjective: being of special interest to that particular subculture.

I'm not refusing to play a good game because it has furry cooties. I'm refusing to play a game because I consider it bad.

Edit: sorry for the post, I'm on painkillers and it's not worth it.

How can you consider it bad without trying it first? Yes, the gameplay is basic, basic does not mean "bad" or lackluster. That being said, yes, Solatorobo is a simple game. It is a fun one though, well suited for the handheld it is in. It is cheesy as hell, but not all things need to be serious. It is pretty good at what it tries to do.

You know what other games are pretty basic?

Super Mario Bros. The Legend of Zelda. Sonic The Hedgehog.

Just because they don't expect you to micromanage a starfleet or time your spells to kill a giant lich does not mean the game isn't worth your time.