That was what I thought after Namur posted. XD

What about zombies?

roflmao >.<
I third this with a slight addition: 3000 rep and no "na" letters in username

Definitely 9999 rep.

Up to the giver.

(But if he/she wants to set a minimum of something, why not "must be registered at least since..."?)

Whatevs. Some folks might be new and want to try for a giveaway. I'd use some high rep for trades, though.

It's possible to make new accounts just to join to increase chances. I don't see that really happening, though. (I could be mistaken or blind)

It doesn't matter what we think. It only matters what the person doing the giveaway thinks. His/her giveaway, his/her rules.

20 to 50 rep.

I think its up to the person doing the give-away maker. I also think that more "rules" are also up to the individual.

Just my 2 cents.

Fair? Is any giveaway fair? Even if you use random.org to draw the winner(s), you'd first have to accept that the majority not getting anything to be "fair", regardless of any rep requirements or similar.

Are there still people around with a negative rep?

The question of this thread is, do you think it is fair. Not, if what we think matters. What we think, obviously doesn't matter because people can do whatever they want with their giveaways.

For everything you've given to the community, it's always been fair. Thankyou Ph7, and keep up the good work. (although i wouldn't blame you if you decided to stop).

That's a bit racist. What's next ? No ninjas ? No pirates ?

Ok, ok, i'm going ;)