Telika: How do they (both) compare with the horizontal Stargunner, horizontality aside ?
groze: Aside the aforementioned horizontality, though all three are pretty good games, if you're into SHMUPs, I'd say Tyrian and Raptor are the better ones. Maybe it's because I prefer vertical side-scrolling shooters, rather than horizontal ones, but in this case it also has to do with fluidity and control, both Tyrian and Raptor control way better than Stargunner. I enjoy the graphics in those two titles better, as well, the pseudo-early-3D and the overall art design in Stargunner are not that compelling, to me.
I used to be fond of the genre (in my amiga and arcade days) but not anymore, even though St Patrick forced me to play Aqua Kitty, which was actually half-fun. Also, as a Galaxians Space Invaders Galactica fan, I had semi-recently spent a huge lot of time on
Warblade, which I consider the best current retro-shoot'em up.
On the other hand, I don't auto-redeem free games, because I don't want to clog my list with stuff just-because-i-can (yaaayy free, benefit, profit, woot, king of the world). So, if I redeem Stargunner, it'd be really to give it a try. Hence my question.
Telika: How do they (both) compare with the horizontal Stargunner, horizontality aside ?
SpellSword: In all three games there is a shop between levels to purchase new weapons/equipment so in that regard all three are similar. Although I believe Stargunner has more options for kinds of equipment that can be purchased. (
If I'm remembering correctly.)
Tyrian feels more Arcade like than Stargunner. Raptor has a slightly slower pace to it (
Which is not a bad thing) than Stargunner and Tyrian, at least in the earlier missions. (
imo)
All three are worth playing. ^_^
Ok.
____
Edit :
I stress this out.
<span class="bold">DO VOTE FOR WARBLADE</span>