Ash360: The thing about justifying is that it implies to me the thing you’re doing would usually be considered bad but this is why it’s right to do it in this instance. You’re essentially trying to convince me this action is the lesser of two evils.
And of course the choice of these three breads is the most horrendous of evils. They offer me a choice where there is none; I only like one of the three. Of course they aren’t to know that but still they get my hopes up by offering me a choice where there is none. At least there isn’t if I want to enjoy the bread but who would chose bread they don’t like? Other people might like more than one of the breads but there certainly isn't consider the feelings of those who may only like one of them or worse none, they are to suffer the let down when they are presented with these other “choices”. I feel especially sorry for those who like none of the breads as they get their hopes raised and then crushed three times and at the end of it are left with nothing for their troubles.
At least if there was one bread some only suffer the let down once. Frankly I find it quite disturbing that most don't even consider peoples feelings or the damage they may be causing.
So GameRager, what do you see as justifying it?
I see it as better to have the illusion of choice and more to "choose" from than none at all.
Also be quiet and enjoy your bread or no dessert for anyone. ;)