We geeks might get wound up about the portrayal of technology in these shows, but really that aspect is no different from the numerous other plot devices and contrivances. Are major city streets ever as empty as they are on CSI when a car chase scene is required? Are standard law enforcers really able to shoot people in the head with one shot at 300 metres using a pistol? Do people really just get more angry when they are shot rather than, say, bleed to death?

I have to say that the only tech fallacy that actually annoys me is the "closeup shot of fingers typing o keyboard". Watching someone typing 75 words per minute in order to input a 7-letter password using only the middle nine keyboard letters is pretty infuriating. :)

And it's a piss poor story teller who keeps going back to them. And it's a sign that a series has either run its course, or, since it's been that way since day one of any of the modern police procedurals (reality TV, dramas, etc.), a sign that they're after easy cash and don't give a damn about the audience. In which case, why the audience gives a damn about the show is mind boggling.

If there was only a single side to writing a script, to making a show, to make money from advertisers and investors, then you could say they were doing a good job, since they made it on the air. But since by means of getting that money they have to appeal to an audience, they've fucked up their jobs by not even trying. And people are failing their damn intelligence tests by watching, no matter if the shit they put up is nonsense tech, nonsense plot, nonsense characters.

Calling people who watch not for realism but for entertainment dumb? Nice.

Did I say a damn thing about realism?

Sounds like it to me.......

These really aren't things I would watch normally but I think the point the guy made is valid that it would take a 5 min Google for the writer to know just how stupid he is.

NCIS did used to try back in the first few series. At least, they used real names for handhelds and the like, but somewhere along the line the lawyers must have gotten edgy as they suddenly started making up names for well known handhelds.

And that is probably most of the problem here. Not the writers, but the suits and lawyers too afraid of being sued if they put out accurate information (IP holder might sue them if they're implying their stuff is used to commit crimes, etc.)

Myfaces and Pearpods and Mapple, OH MY!

I would hazard that very few people are cerebral about everything they do, all the time. I mean I love to be intellectually challenged whether it's by playing chess, doing crosswords, having philosophical discussions or making something with my hands. That does not mean, however, that every form of entertainment or stimulation I seek must operate at a constantly enlightened level. I mean, I'm also a gamer after all. ;)

Two shows that I watch at the moment (of many) are NCIS and The Mentalist. Both of these shows are crime dramas that operate at a pure entertainment level, although not every episode is equally satisfying of course. The Mentalist even works by convincing the average viewer that they are as smart as the main character, despite the fact that you only ever see what the makers intend you to and so are carefully guided towards certain conclusions. Do I feel dirty after I've watched it because of this? No, I just enjoy the characterisations and storytelling if they have appealed to me.

On the other hand, there are many shows that try to take the high road and convey themselves as being more intelligent than, in fact, they are. The most recent Battlestar Galactica is an example of this for me, a show that in my opinion was so far up its own arse that it could gargle its eyeballs. I know many people enjoyed the show for various reasons, but after watching the full series I just felt annoyed more than anything else.

This is why I watch Law and Order :P. Especially the early series, as they were a different era from the CSI crap.

Hear ye! My thoughts exactly on both counts. And I usually get fed up when any holyer than thou crap/religion messes up a perfectly nice show or book for that matter.

My thoughts exactly.

As an expert in the field, Dexter has it all wrong.

Actually you could safely stick a brick of C4 into your PC. You do realize that it actually requires a detonator to set off Composition C explosives? Random electrical activity from a PC wouldn't do it.