bazilisek: Jess, you seem to be working with a strange idea that voting for someone is more suspicious than verbally attacking them. It's not. It's just another thing the players do, and carries as much weight. This is why some of us keep saying Ghost was attacking Damnation -- because she plainly was. The fact that she didn't vote for him as well is interesting, yes,
but not voting for him doesn't make her attacks any less noteworthy. There very clearly is "blood on her hands" even if she didn't vote for Damnation until the last minute. Voting patterns are not the be-all and end-all.
Well you seem to be misinterpreting my point there, with that summary. The closest compromise I can change your starting sentence there to match what I mean is that "verbally attacking them and not voting them" is indeed more scummy than "verbally attacking them and voting them," in this context. Hell, she called him an outright scum
here early on, but deigned to place her vote on him until after he had claimed scum, despite the size of Damnation's versus Orry's wagon as the day went on.
If you think X and Y are both scum and a bandwagon is forming on X, and no one's currently voting with you on Y, why wouldn't you switch and push X? She was actively posting after the Orry bandwagon fell apart and the Damnation one built, and yet was orchestrating it from afar, arguing her case on him without voting, safe on her 1-vote bandwagon until after he had shot himself with his claim. Doesn't strike me as a townie based on the interpretation of her actions.
I could go back and point out her D1 attack on Damnation really started with a
defensive argument and a veiled threat when
he attacked her for the exact same reason I am now, vote wagon analysis (by the way while she defended that argument there in #78 just fine, I am reusing it here in a totally different context). But I doubt anyone (including myself) wants to have another wall of quotes from me to rip apart Day 1 posts so I'll just ask people to read back with my viewpoint in mind. But to be clear, I'm not basing the attack on votes only, her actual votes by themselves are not at all scummy. I'm trying to show the wishy-washiness, and how she contradicts herself with her votes as opposed to her writing of things like her declaration of him being scum, and how that does not seem townie.
@Robb, there was absolutely no risk in voting or hammering after Damnation had claimed scum. Regardless of her alignment, it was more than a fair move and foregone conclusion by then. I don't find that inherently scummy at all, except the way she's using that to justify being on the Damnation bandwagon, when she damned well was not.
@Rest of the town that haven't chipped in. Any thoughts? You sure as hell don't have to agree with me either. Baz isn't but I think his posting style is fairly town so far for various reasons.
Anyway lunch. :)