Typhoon45: I have to agree, the fact that Zchinque hasn't even trotted out a "random voting" excuse is kind of suspicious. Care to elaborate, Z?
Robbeasy: Although Zchinque hasn't come out with any explanation yet, it is just a random vote at the moment, so not worthy of a vote methinks. I'd still like Bazilisek to explain his contradictions better.
@It isn't a random vote, though. He clearly said so with #21,
Zchinque: Screw the random vote stage.
Who's up for a mass claim?
and then #23,
Zchinque: Vote Al1.
First scum identified.
But I think I do see his aim and the point of his vote. Course it doesn't necessarily clear him as town.
Typhoon45: I'm going to call shenanigans on this one. It's just as likely the everyone who has voted so far is mafia as they are innocent, and that the Mafia is just egging everyone on by pointing the FoS at each other.
So screw rational discussion! I'm going
vote nolynch until further notice.
@Typhoon, you are right in that currently it's nearly impossible to tell the chaff from the wheat yet. But voting no-lynch isn't the way to go, as that's a firm declaration you're willing to go into night 1 with no lynch, which is the town's most powerful, and possibly only killing, tool. It goes far above and beyond saying "It's too unclear to vote right now." Why are you against rational discussion? If somehow that vote passed right now, it would be very advantageous for Mafia (killing off a free townie) but what would town gain from it since there has been nearly no discussion? We'd be back to square 1 with 1 less person and no meaningful evidence.