I was kind of hoping that HijacK would defend himself better against your accusations and would come up with more substantial readings.
Well, I guess I might as well try to explain why I tend to believe he is town (though by no means certain).
It's primarily because I think he is very intelligent, yet thinks that most of us are pretty stupid.

If he were scum, I'd expect him not to do grossly suspicious intentional moves, because I don't believe he would trust us to see these as anything but suspicious moves.
1) At the same time he began hunting adalia (around post #210) he also posted his recipe for "bussing yourself" (posts #207 + #215). If he were scum and was actually beginning a bus on adalia, juxtaposing the two would be a very risky move. Too risky to trust us with.
2) Similarly, when he posted his pre-lynch prediction of adalia's innocence, if he were scum, he'd know that in mere minutes or hours he would be proven wrong. Again I believe it is too suspicious a move for him to trust us with. That post reads like a genuine setup for a "told you so" post on the morning of day #2.

As for my scum list, nothing much has changed since my posts #706 and #765. It's still Robbeasy, Vitek, trentonlf.

Robbeasy: When I posted my Robbeasy post, I was hoping it would lead to other people raising other points about him (in either direction). This hasn't really happened, with the exception of CSPVG's vote, but I believe CSPVG had doubts about Robbeasy even before my post. Some people found my points interesting, some didn't, but nothing much was added to the discussion (not the least because Robbeasy didn't post a whole lot, but he's hardly an exception).
While on the Robbeasy question, I would like to draw his attention to the "promise" he made us 4 days ago (#697) to "get started on the group not voting yesterday" (presumably voting for each one in turn to "put pressure on them"). He voted Vitek (without any real explanation, I believe) and since then the vote has stayed there. What exactly are the criteria for you to move to the next one, Robbeasy?

Vitek: dedoporno has made his case against him. Overall, I can't say that the Vitek-dedoporno stand-off has moved me much from my original stance, which was that Vitek seems intent on stifling certain forms of what I consider legitimate town discussion, which makes me suspicious.
I don't know whether the fact that Robbeasy has a vote on him for no convincing reason is suspicious or not. After all, Robbeasy has for now a perfect track record for placing an early vote on scum for no convincing reason. But I would be very much surprised if he'd try to pull the same stunt twice (assuming he did on adalia).

trentonlf: I think a townie would have admitted by now that revealing his ship model and his being vanilla, regardless of his original reasons or excuses, was a mistake, as it helps the scum. In game #23 he didn't strike me as someone who is unwilling to admit his mistakes. For a while I sincerely thought that he was trying to get himself intentionally lynched and even had a "crazy" theory about it, but now he seems back to defending himself, so I probably got it wrong.

That said, I don't feel confident enough to put my vote on any of them yet (I do not vote to put pressure on people).