Posted October 27, 2014
HijacK
One man army
HijacK Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2012
From Romania
dedoporno
A bloody pirate!
dedoporno Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2012
From Bulgaria
Posted October 27, 2014
HijacK: Maybe not a mistake, but I am fairly certain flub said something about a wife, at least in this game, and fairly soon in Day 1.
He did, he actually voted for her :D But I have to say I hear where trentonlf is coming from on this specific matter. Last game flub's cheerleader role-play actually led me to believe for a while that mrkgnao is female :)
trentonlf
Easily amused
trentonlf Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2014
From United States
Posted October 27, 2014
He did mention a wife, but in todays world that does not mean man and woman. Flub made quite a few comments in that game that lead me to belive he was a woman. Guess he played his role too well LOL
mrkgnao
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HCZVCTO
mrkgnao Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2009
From United States
Posted October 27, 2014
I you get accepted to Berkeley and move to California, you might want to avoid jumping to the conclusion that just because one has a wife, one is male. If I'm not mistaken there are already 32 states where you might want to avoid this conclusion.
yogsloth
GRAAAAAAH!!!!!
yogsloth Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2013
From United States
Posted October 27, 2014
HijacK: Maybe not a mistake, but I am fairly certain flub said something about a wife, at least in this game, and fairly soon in Day 1.
mrkgnao: I you get accepted to Berkeley and move to California, you might want to avoid jumping to the conclusion that just because one has a wife, one is male. If I'm not mistaken there are already 32 states where you might want to avoid this conclusion. DarkoD13
No Strings On Me
DarkoD13 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2013
From Greece
Posted October 27, 2014
mrkgnao: I you get accepted to Berkeley and move to California, you might want to avoid jumping to the conclusion that just because one has a wife, one is male. If I'm not mistaken there are already 32 states where you might want to avoid this conclusion.
You made Scalia sad. :D Very interesting posts today, I'll finish my thoughts post tonight. I do agree with a lot of the points made by yogsloth, but I interpret some observations about a couple of people differently.
mrkgnao
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HCZVCTO
mrkgnao Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2009
From United States
Posted October 27, 2014
mrkgnao: I you get accepted to Berkeley and move to California, you might want to avoid jumping to the conclusion that just because one has a wife, one is male. If I'm not mistaken there are already 32 states where you might want to avoid this conclusion.
DarkoD13: You made Scalia sad. :D Very interesting posts today, I'll finish my thoughts post tonight. I do agree with a lot of the points made by yogsloth, but I interpret some observations about a couple of people differently.
yogsloth
GRAAAAAAH!!!!!
yogsloth Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2013
From United States
Posted October 27, 2014
Lots of little loose ends to wrap up from my large post last night. Just wanted to respond to HijacK first:
Really.
HijacK: While I get that you weren't obvious in your accusation, did you really think I'm stupid not to notice? I read carefully, and thoroughly. That's why I was able to catch adalia.
Except that you didn't. You posted that you firmly believed he was town. Remember that bit? You “believed” he was town, and didn’t vote for him. HijacK: Yeah, you're entirely wrong about the whole thing as far as my "implication" with adalia is concerned. If I was scum, I'd play it smarter than bussing one of my team on Day 1 when nothing is concrete. Wasn't that obvious? Or are you trying to call me stupid?
No, not at all. If anything I'm annoyed you're the only guy to catch certain things. Scum bussing each other on Day 1 isn't inherently smart or stupid... it's a strategic play. Risky, perhaps, but not stupid by itself. In fact, didn't you say something exactly to this effect previously in game #23 or the aftermath, about allowing yourself to be bussed if you were scum so your scum buddies could get their names on your wagon? Somebody help me out and find that post. Why was that legitimate strategy earlier, but now when you’re accused of doing it, it’s “stupid”? HijacK: While I acknowledge trent's playstyle is entirely different from games #22 and #23, using something of a mystique like tone in his posts, something that he has never done before, that doesn't mean I'll jump on him. He made questionable decisions with his words, but guess what? As far as I'm concerned, almost everyone who's here alive in Day 2 has done a questionable thing, or more. Should I jump on everyone I think did a questionable thing?
Yes. Yes you should. Really.
HijacK: Let me teach you a mathematical algorithm I learned in mathematics and history. It's call Divide and Conquer. I'll monitor everyone's words and interactions with other people, and when someone has said something that I deem too scumy, that's when I'll strike. Not sooner, not later. Divide and Conquer. As simple as that.
OK then. I’ll wait patiently.mrkgnao
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HCZVCTO
mrkgnao Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2009
From United States
Posted October 27, 2014
yogsloth: In fact, didn't you say something exactly to this effect previously in game #23 or the aftermath, about allowing yourself to be bussed if you were scum so your scum buddies could get their names on your wagon? Somebody help me out and find that post.
It wasn't in game #23, it was in game #24, but I can't really blame you for thinking it was ages ago. It's in posts #207 + #215. I already pointed it out in my post #711.
yogsloth
GRAAAAAAH!!!!!
yogsloth Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2013
From United States
Posted October 27, 2014
mrkgnao: It wasn't in game #23, it was in game #24, but I can't really blame you for thinking it was ages ago.
It's in posts #207 + #215. I already pointed it out in my post #711.
Well, no wonder I couldn't find it, lol. So yes, Hijack, let's take a look at this: It's in posts #207 + #215. I already pointed it out in my post #711.
HijacK: There are many ways to play as scum and given the chance to be one I would've played the exact same way in such a manner to get lynched but have the other scum on my vote wagon to gain them credibility. Wouldn't those that haven't voted for me stand out, in spite of being town? Then it's all easy. Eradicate at night town that were on y vote wagon, and attempt to put the blame on those that look fishy. Fairly mediocre plan, but I am sure it would work here.
Contrasted to this: HijacK: Yeah, you're entirely wrong about the whole thing as far as my "implication" with adalia is concerned. If I was scum, I'd play it smarter than bussing one of my team on Day 1 when nothing is concrete. Wasn't that obvious? Or are you trying to call me stupid?
Note the bolded parts. I feel like it's getting warmer in here.
yogsloth
GRAAAAAAH!!!!!
yogsloth Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2013
From United States
Posted October 27, 2014
I also want to offer a quick apology to trent. After re-reading last night's post (which I was rushing by the time I got to his part at the end), it reads less "funny sarcasm" which I intended, and more "geez, what an a-hole".
Credit back to trent as well for picking up on the Kryspn vs. Sage style posts. Thanks mrkgnao for pointing that out.
My base points still stand, but I did a relatively poor job of constructing coherent argument.
Credit back to trent as well for picking up on the Kryspn vs. Sage style posts. Thanks mrkgnao for pointing that out.
My base points still stand, but I did a relatively poor job of constructing coherent argument.
Sage103082
Kitten Tamer: 8
Sage103082 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Mar 2014
From United States
Posted October 27, 2014
yogsloth: Leaning scum
This will be a tough one, so in ascending order of filthiness:
Sage – Her play style has always been one of the indecisive and overly-cautious wallflower. Game one, let’s give her a pass. Game two, it was grating on me so much I was convinced she was scum until the last day. Game three… I can’t take it much more. Although her contributions this weekend have softened my stance somewhat, I see her total contributions to the first 1½ days thus far largely being “Hi all, not much, shower, not much, don’t know, bath, think about it later, shower, good points, will post more, kthanksbai”. And around and around as to what’s not happening. Posting huge walls of copied textwith no comments? That’s both ridiculous and prima facie obfuscatory. Then when I tell her to stop, she drops it and runs away. No defending her actions – just a total retreat and never mentions it again. Game three and this skittish? It just feels like scum running for her life, not sure what to do next to avoid detection. (Do I lurk? Do I post? What do I post that says nothing and reveals nothing?) As I say, her posts just today are ten times better than what I’ve seen all game, so perhaps her confidence is finally increasing. Sorry Sage, I’m just not going to trust you until you get more aggressive. Do I have enough to start a wagon? It’s little more than a gut feeling, so no, not at all. I’m just keeping a very close eye on this one.
Not to keen on words being put into my mouth to make it look like im a 12 year old girl but whatever. Seems I was not the only one posting about RL. I guess since I dont have a wife and kids my trying to let others know Im still here and reading doesn't count. Ill keep that in mind. This will be a tough one, so in ascending order of filthiness:
Sage – Her play style has always been one of the indecisive and overly-cautious wallflower. Game one, let’s give her a pass. Game two, it was grating on me so much I was convinced she was scum until the last day. Game three… I can’t take it much more. Although her contributions this weekend have softened my stance somewhat, I see her total contributions to the first 1½ days thus far largely being “Hi all, not much, shower, not much, don’t know, bath, think about it later, shower, good points, will post more, kthanksbai”. And around and around as to what’s not happening. Posting huge walls of copied textwith no comments? That’s both ridiculous and prima facie obfuscatory. Then when I tell her to stop, she drops it and runs away. No defending her actions – just a total retreat and never mentions it again. Game three and this skittish? It just feels like scum running for her life, not sure what to do next to avoid detection. (Do I lurk? Do I post? What do I post that says nothing and reveals nothing?) As I say, her posts just today are ten times better than what I’ve seen all game, so perhaps her confidence is finally increasing. Sorry Sage, I’m just not going to trust you until you get more aggressive. Do I have enough to start a wagon? It’s little more than a gut feeling, so no, not at all. I’m just keeping a very close eye on this one.
For my post on books quotes from day one. I thought it would be good to have them all in one place. You jumped right on it with a stop. No one else said it would be a good thing either so I stopped. Simple as that. Because I did not get my thongs in a bunch and try to fight over it there must be something off me with.. Little far fetched and contradicting. I am trying to find the scum not help them so I have no problem listen to others when it is needed.
As for lurking you might want to look at some other people as well. As I have not had the chance to post as much as I have wanted I try to always keep up on reading. I am not one to say I have not read this or that ill do it later. I will state I will post my thoughts in a bit when I have more time to gather them and put them into a post.
You seem to be calling me out about my staying on the side lines for a while and just recently I have been posting better.... scum tend to sink and town tend to get their footing as scum post more and more nonsense.
yogsloth
GRAAAAAAH!!!!!
yogsloth Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2013
From United States
Posted October 27, 2014
@trent:
Sorry, it’s also overdue I carefully respond to your post, so you don’t feel so ignored. : ) I’m not going to multi-quote here, but will refer to post #s. This is in response to your post 809, and I will address each point.
1) How could you get back on the wagon? Let’s revisit post #491. You jump off the wagon, looking for more info from adalia. Fair enough. Shortly after, he role-claims. Discussion ensues. Post 513 I give my decision matrix on why I think the lynch should proceed. Immediately afterward, post 514, you say “Excellent post, thank you for that”. Dedo unvotes to also think things through. Vitek unvotes. More discussion. Post 531, you say that you think one of myself or adalia are scum, but you’re not sure which. Dedo re-votes. More discussion. Several players chime in in favor of a lynch. You are right there the whole time, adalia needs one more to hammer, nearly everyone is on the record… you have every chance to re-vote, but never take it, because apparently your opinion is wholly subservient to every single other person in the game going first. That makes no sense to me. Multiple posters already on the wagon re-confirm why they’re there… but not you, who seem to try and drag things out as long as possible.
2) It’s bogus you making the “no role” claim at 11:59 of the first day. Why throw that kind of spanner into the works moments before nightfall? You just get everyone wondering what the heck you were doing, with no chance to question you for several real-life days. And sorry, I don’t think anybody caught you were role-claiming earlier in the day. For ship models, you shouldn’t be muddying the waters at all. Neither should CSPVG for sure – but throwing your two cents in didn’t help anybody. It was more distraction.
3) You want me to point it out? OK. Post 601 you are already on the defensive about your reveal, having been advised that some (like me) find it distractionary. But, fine, you keep going on about it. Post 610, 632, you’re talking about it, and then conversation on that topic largely dies. Then post 687 you’re back at it. And 708. And the topic dies again. And there you are in 777, bringing it up again, to counter Sage… who was trying to tell you to stop talking about it! I assume this is what you mean by “explaining it for the umpteenth time”. Well, it’s just a little too much for me. Is this point by itself enough to start shouting “SCUM!” No, it isn’t. It’s a cumulative effect of discomfort that connects to all the other points.
4) I forgot to add post 735, where you claim you don’t know why posts shouldn’t be edited. Give me a break with this – really? You really don’t know, three games in? Of course you do. So why pretend you don’t? More fluff and distraction.
5) Your post in question was just too wishy-washy and indecisive. Time to firm up.
6) Possibly. Do you see why I’m not the only one to be uncomfortable with your overall play direction in this game, however?
OK, I shut up for a while now. Too much yog in one day. Robb notes there's a lot more yappin', and not much votin', and he's right. Maybe I am just too much of a wuss, but I want to hear some more firm suspicions before trying to drive a wagon myself.
Sorry, it’s also overdue I carefully respond to your post, so you don’t feel so ignored. : ) I’m not going to multi-quote here, but will refer to post #s. This is in response to your post 809, and I will address each point.
1) How could you get back on the wagon? Let’s revisit post #491. You jump off the wagon, looking for more info from adalia. Fair enough. Shortly after, he role-claims. Discussion ensues. Post 513 I give my decision matrix on why I think the lynch should proceed. Immediately afterward, post 514, you say “Excellent post, thank you for that”. Dedo unvotes to also think things through. Vitek unvotes. More discussion. Post 531, you say that you think one of myself or adalia are scum, but you’re not sure which. Dedo re-votes. More discussion. Several players chime in in favor of a lynch. You are right there the whole time, adalia needs one more to hammer, nearly everyone is on the record… you have every chance to re-vote, but never take it, because apparently your opinion is wholly subservient to every single other person in the game going first. That makes no sense to me. Multiple posters already on the wagon re-confirm why they’re there… but not you, who seem to try and drag things out as long as possible.
2) It’s bogus you making the “no role” claim at 11:59 of the first day. Why throw that kind of spanner into the works moments before nightfall? You just get everyone wondering what the heck you were doing, with no chance to question you for several real-life days. And sorry, I don’t think anybody caught you were role-claiming earlier in the day. For ship models, you shouldn’t be muddying the waters at all. Neither should CSPVG for sure – but throwing your two cents in didn’t help anybody. It was more distraction.
3) You want me to point it out? OK. Post 601 you are already on the defensive about your reveal, having been advised that some (like me) find it distractionary. But, fine, you keep going on about it. Post 610, 632, you’re talking about it, and then conversation on that topic largely dies. Then post 687 you’re back at it. And 708. And the topic dies again. And there you are in 777, bringing it up again, to counter Sage… who was trying to tell you to stop talking about it! I assume this is what you mean by “explaining it for the umpteenth time”. Well, it’s just a little too much for me. Is this point by itself enough to start shouting “SCUM!” No, it isn’t. It’s a cumulative effect of discomfort that connects to all the other points.
4) I forgot to add post 735, where you claim you don’t know why posts shouldn’t be edited. Give me a break with this – really? You really don’t know, three games in? Of course you do. So why pretend you don’t? More fluff and distraction.
5) Your post in question was just too wishy-washy and indecisive. Time to firm up.
6) Possibly. Do you see why I’m not the only one to be uncomfortable with your overall play direction in this game, however?
OK, I shut up for a while now. Too much yog in one day. Robb notes there's a lot more yappin', and not much votin', and he's right. Maybe I am just too much of a wuss, but I want to hear some more firm suspicions before trying to drive a wagon myself.
DarkoD13
No Strings On Me
DarkoD13 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2013
From Greece
Telika
Registered: Apr 2012
From Switzerland