Posted October 16, 2014
CSPVG: Shouldn't yog rather reiterate his reasons for suspecting books, rather than just shrugging and saying,"Well, let's see how this goes." Especially since books already had two votes to his name at this point. It seems as if yog was just trying to slide onto the vote wagon without much fuss.
This is a fair question, and deserves a straightforward response. My suspicion of adalia began back in post #208. This was long after I asked for peoples’ opinions on the nature of the current game. After I did that, a number of folks asked the question of what my motivation might have been for asking such a question. That’s good, and expected town behavior. Sometime later, however, Adalia says this about my original post:
That didn’t sit well with me, as my original post was so early in the game – with literally zero serious posting before that – that I couldn’t make this connection from a town perspective. Asking about my motivation? Yes, you should do that. Assuming a simple question so early in the game is so nefarious? To me, this is scum trying early to frame and deflect.
Still, I needed to ping these suspicions off of other players before I moved forward. I was not alone in poking Adalia a bit after that, and certainly not alone in dissatisfaction with his responses.
Admittedly, we are still in day #1, with comparably little to go on – but this is the best lead I feel I have. Once I saw two other votes on the table – and users like dedo and flub also moving scumwards in their assessment of adalia – I felt more secure in my own suspicions.
Note that I feel answering your question as I have done is also risky, as it could very well paint a nightkill target on my back. Such are the risks we take.
That’s where I’m at. How do you feel, CSPVG?