Fixin' to go have "maritals" with wifey so don't think I have boundaries...

Please, tell me what people are those. I would help me a lot.

He does, doesn't he? It's almost like he's way too timid. Is this just D1 lack of information speaking or is it something else?

Not caring about a complete game play change.

Not going to go into why someone would think more than 3 scum.

As stated above. Not going to even consider its a way to throw off the other players.

The old its just Flub no biggie

Nothing apparently, since he has you listed as null. I should lurk more.



Yo mama finds me engaging though. And I respect her opinion.



I was going to say that that's kind of what he does in all the games after burying the argumentative hatchet with JMich and he's not lying, but then again the antithesis that you point out in him not caring about the new HijacK is interesting indeed. Unless we consider HijacK a very unique case due to the previous game and what people supposedly advised him in that observatory thread (I haven't read that myself).

To be fair to Hijack last game I pushed him into arguing on purpose. I was wanting to have the attention focused on someone and he was the easiest one to point at. Adaliabooks actually picked up on that but never really pushed me on it. As for how he is acting this game the "I know more than you" demeanor is still there except he is being more calm about it.

@yogsloth - thanks for that, a good post methinks.

vote adaliabooks

painting yogsloths post as saying nothing is an unwarranted attack i think, and smacks of someone coming under pressure and not particularly liking it.

I explained this before. It was change for good and it wouldn't make sense he changed his play so obviously only because he is mafia.
Does it mean he can't be mafia? Hell no. But it is neutral tell so yeah, I am not concerned by it.

Yes I wanted end of discussion about number of mafia. It helps in no way with catching scum, it can be used to talk about non-issues. Plus mrkgnao was able to come with dozen of "crazy" setup ideas last game (I commented on it in observer chat) I wouldn't want him to continue here. :-)
Why would it mean I am convinced of someone being town? Because I don't want to talk about number of mafia makes someone town in my eyes? o_O

I never try to talk about possible breadcrumbs in any game. I tend to ignore them and am never happy when people try to bring them to limelight when it's too soon. I also played many times with flub and it is just fact, he tends to use themed avatar for every game and often they were not representation of his role but sometimes they were.
What way do you think I decided his alignment here? Am I ignoring him because I think he is town? Shouldn't I then support his claim which was town if I belive him town?

So what does it tell me when he does it every time even when he is town (I think he wasn't scum yet)? How do you think I should discuss this if I saw it 5 or so times already?
Once again, it in no way means he is town for me. It's only that this particular thing tells me nothing. It doesn't make him no more or less town nor mafia. But it also doesn't force me to discuss it.

It sounds to me like you are hurt that I was questioning you. But that's how I play. when I observe something I find not right, I question it. I may decide to drop it later or not. Things I am not interested in I just don't comment on but it doesn't mean
I also rarely decided someone is scum based on 1 post. It would have to be exceptionally bad. That I question someone doesn't mean I already decided they are scum.

Thank you for your answers and "hurt" would not be the right word. Annoyed maybe because I felt you were looking at me only and no one else.

Yes. I did catch on to that subtle hint from you.
You will note that since then I have been very, very good and have in no way attempted to imply that there might be any number of scum other than three (despite having at least one opportunity). Can I have a cookie now?

Here is indisputable proof that three is the number: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOrgLj9lOwk&t=89

But seriously, I did read the observer thread of game #23 and I did take some of the comments there to heart and am therefore attempting to improve (or at least amend) my game accordingly.

To Marlon Brando (Godfather) I think in G14 where he was scum, to Norman Bates in G15 where he was roleblcoker (for good guys), to child in G16 where he had role of the Innocent Child, to some weird alien creepy thing in G17 where he was Tony Hill town cop to some blonde young woman and later to mean looking nun in G19 where he play town lyncher (man), to king in guaads mafia where he was guard, to some weird red thing (hand perhaps?) in G21 where he was with-dead-speaking town and then finally cheerleader in last game where he played cheerleader. So yeah, somtimes it was connected to his role but more often it was not (or it had well hidden meaning) so I don't think you can't take anything from it.

Check your sources again. In game #22 SilentWolf, or whatever his name is, was lynched because of his comment on how he wanted to at least make it to Day 2, like that was more important to him than finding scum.

Some people questioned his intentions. The fact he may be scum trying to get a townie lynched faster came up in conversations of some around here.

And what if someone is indeed looking at you like that? This is a game where everything you say is analyzed, so if you trip, it's your fault. Holding grudges is cool and all, but don't go on a revenge like post just because you were questioned. This only makes you look as scum.