mrkgnao: Like Darko, I too cannot understand the logic behind the argument that we will learn something by lynching a random target and analysing his readings. We didn't learn much anything of value from either adalia's or flub's readings. What's different now?
Robbeasy: 1) I'm not advocating a random target, please stop putting words into my mouth that I haven't once said. massive scum points for doing so.
You are right. My use of the word "random" was poorly chosen. A better phrase would have read "I too cannot understand the logic behind the argument that we will learn something by lynching
a specific target that does not necessarily look scummy or scummiest".
Robbeasy: 2) Analysing lynches, going back and rereading posts after learning the alignment, looking at bandwagon patterns - ITS ALL WE'VE GOT!! Apologies for shouting, but everybody appears to be missing the point here - yes, there is ALWAYS a certain amount of WIFOM with any analysis and any theories, but you HAVE to base them on some sort of fact, otherwise its nothing but complete subjective bullshit.
This applies equally well to every one of us. Why did you pick HijacK? If I am not mistaken, at the moment you are the only one who has him as scum. Most others have him as neutral or town (I can't be sure of that because not everyone has posted their exact thoughts after HijacK's claim). So basically you are recommending to lynch HijacK, whom you find scummy, not by making a case about his scumminess (beyond the vague "Not completely happy with the claim, role cop is the weakest of roles"), but by pointing out that lynching him specifically would somehow reveal the most information, yet failing, as far as I can see, to explain why you believe it is so.
BTW, HijacK did not claim "role cop". He claimed "flavour cop" (or as some people would have it, "flavor cop", for reasons that are beyond me. Perhaps they dislike "u". I do not.). Do you have any reason to assume he is a role cop?
Robbeasy: Mrkgnao - I've tried to ignore the blatant chasing of me, but I can't any longer. You're going to have some fast talking to do when I flip town.
If I am not mistaken your only argument so far for listing me as scum is that I have been chasing you. Is that correct? Could you please point me to other arguments you have made in the past? Do you think that chasing players one believes may well be scum is an attribute one would neceassarily associate with scum?
Robbeasy: 4) And I haven't ignored anything from mrk - my last few posts have adequately explained my stance, my view on everyone, and my reasons for doing it.
I may well have missed your replies, for which I apologise. Could you please direct me to your answers to the questions (or implied questions) I have posed [note: I do not think that post #1605 is an adequate answer, I see it as merely a restatement of #1597]:
1) #1598: "In post #1451, you offered a gradient list of the five non-adalia-voters (scum to town). You listed HijacK fourth, second only to trentonlf (your towniest). Your summary ends: "So a bit of good and bad from Hijack, neutral". At that point HijacK already had three votes. You did not vote for him, so presumably you did not suspect him that much back then. Since you now suspect him, I presume you do so as a result of his claim. As this seems to be the opposite trajectory that most others (including myself) have taken, perhaps you should explain. You did jot some thoughts in #1517, but not enough for me to figure it out."
2) #1598: " Additionally, could you please elaborate roughly what kind of information you expect to be revealed if he flips town and if he flips scum."
3) #1612: " Yet you do not vote for the only claimed vanilla at this point. You list him as your towniest and vote instead on someone who has a role."
If you deem me unworthy of an answer (for which I can only blame myself and for which I apologise if I have been too brutal in my scum hunting), I believe dedo, yogsloth, HijacK, and Sage have asked you rather similar questions.
While waiting for Robbeasy's reply, my reasons for voting for him are:
(a) The "Can you see why I'm doing this?" argument.
(b) What I see as his attempt to masquerade his wish to lynch HijacK (for whatever reason) as if it's the best choice for the town even if one does not believe HijacK is the scummiest, and failing to offer further explanation (beyond what I consider alarmist tactics).
(c) My inability to find adequate answers from him to questions raised by HijacK, dedoporno, yogsloth, Sage, and myself (I admit this might be a deficiency of mine, which I hope he (or others) will rectify).
(d) His town vanilla claim, which means that if I am wrong, at least we "only" lost a vanilla (this is of course only a significant reason because, as he himself correctly pointed out, the clock is a-ticking).