It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussion (archive)GOG Mafia #19 - A slalom Mafia(2133 posts)(2133 posts)
(2133 posts)
Pages:
1
25
44
45
46
47
48
75
100
125
143
This is my favourite topic
Posted January 28, 2014
avatar
Red_Baron: No freaking clue:
P1na (Crazy - gives both a good and a bad feeling)
You know me so well... could this be love?

And BTW, I just decided to leave my suicidal tendecies aside for the time being, I'm leaving the faked death thing as a plan B.
Posted January 28, 2014
A bit confused by two points :

avatar
Red_Baron: Perhaps not scum due to liking Prudence
You assume that scum like scum, or scum and town like different people, or ?...

I really don't get this direct like/dislike-based scumhunting (as if these would straightforward map affiliations), and I've even mentionned it as part of my reasons to vote nmillar (serious scumpointing based on "roleplay" ?).

I wouldn't be surprised to be nightkilled by someone I "like", or even someone who "likes" me, not to mention someone who claims to. Likewise, given the flavor, I don't expect my "dislike" to be scum.

(Okay, I hope this is whithin the undefined lines of authorised discussions, as not close to saying who my likes and dislikes are. :-/ The "close to discuss clues!" -me!?- freaked me out a bit.)

avatar
Red_Baron: Telika (Who however always fools me)
I don't really remember having fooled someone (or even having tried to) in my mafia career. Where does this "always" come from ?
Posted January 28, 2014
avatar
Telika: A bit confused by two points :

avatar
Red_Baron: Perhaps not scum due to liking Prudence
avatar
Telika: You assume that scum like scum, or scum and town like different people, or ?...

I really don't get this direct like/dislike-based scumhunting (as if these would straightforward map affiliations), and I've even mentionned it as part of my reasons to vote nmillar (serious scumpointing based on "roleplay" ?).

I wouldn't be surprised to be nightkilled by someone I "like", or even someone who "likes" me, not to mention someone who claims to. Likewise, given the flavor, I don't expect my "dislike" to be scum.

(Okay, I hope this is whithin the undefined lines of authorised discussions, as not close to saying who my likes and dislikes are. :-/ The "close to discuss clues!" -me!?- freaked me out a bit.)
I never thought those-which-will-not-be-named would have anything to do with allegiance, but as a way of figuring out who is who after knowing the-other-things-which-will-not-be-named.
Posted January 28, 2014
avatar
Red_Baron: Perhaps not scum due to liking Prudence
no no no!

avatar
Telika: You assume that scum like scum, or scum and town like different people, or ?...
[...]
no no no no no no!!

avatar
amok: I never thought those-which-will-not-be-named would have anything to do with allegiance, but as a way of figuring out who is who after knowing the-other-things-which-will-not-be-named.
no no no no no no no no no!!!
Post edited January 28, 2014 by JoeSapphire
Posted January 28, 2014
avatar
amok: I never thought those-which-will-not-be-named would have anything to do with allegiance, but as a way of figuring out who is who after knowing the-other-things-which-will-not-be-named.
avatar
JoeSapphire: no no no no no no no no no!!!
umm... I am off course talking about Lord Moldevort and the deatheaters...
Posted January 28, 2014
avatar
JoeSapphire: no no no!

no no no no no no!!

no no no no no no no no no!!!
mmmm.... it's kinda annoying that we can't talk about that at all. I thought the rules implied not to give extra info after day 1, not that we couldn't bring up the already public ones.
Posted January 28, 2014
avatar
P1na: mmmm.... it's kinda annoying that we can't talk about that at all. I thought the rules implied not to give extra info after day 1, not that we couldn't bring up the already public ones.
I apologise for the ambiguity but no you must not mention clues/likes/dislikes for the rest of the game
Posted January 28, 2014
avatar
P1na: mmmm.... it's kinda annoying that we can't talk about that at all. I thought the rules implied not to give extra info after day 1, not that we couldn't bring up the already public ones.
I find it quite clear: ;-)

" You may freely discuss your LIKES, HATES and CLUES throughout the first voting stage (Day One), but after that LIKES, HATES and CLUES, whether they're real or falsified, whether they've been discussed in the past or not, MUST NOT BE MENTIONED. "

Hope this doesn't count. :-)

Gah, I need to check something in older games and I can imagine how the forum will work now with sale.
Posted January 28, 2014
avatar
Vitek: I find it quite clear: ;-)

" You may freely discuss your LIKES, HATES and CLUES throughout the first voting stage (Day One), but after that LIKES, HATES and CLUES, whether they're real or falsified, whether they've been discussed in the past or not, MUST NOT BE MENTIONED. "

Hope this doesn't count. :-)

Gah, I need to check something in older games and I can imagine how the forum will work now with sale.
mmm... It's indeed clear over there. It was not so clear on the PM. No matter, we'll just not mention them from now on.
Posted January 28, 2014
avatar
Vitek: I find it quite clear: ;-)

" You may freely discuss your LIKES, HATES and CLUES throughout the first voting stage (Day One), but after that LIKES, HATES and CLUES, whether they're real or falsified, whether they've been discussed in the past or not, MUST NOT BE MENTIONED. "

Hope this doesn't count. :-)

Gah, I need to check something in older games and I can imagine how the forum will work now with sale.
avatar
P1na: mmm... It's indeed clear over there. It was not so clear on the PM. No matter, we'll just not mention them from now on.
mention what?
Posted January 28, 2014
avatar
amok: mention what?
that which must not be mentioned.
Posted January 28, 2014
p7 - red just blurting out info :(

p9 - like that amok trying to start discussion about that which can no longer be talked about

p20 - jmich after an early mass claim, just blurts out info without any discussion on the subject

genie well and truely out the bottle by p37 as amok making list, madness

p72 - nonsense from amok about game been a logic puzzle if that's actually the case then isn't a game of mafia

p76 - like fact darko trying to work stuff out

p77 - don't understand spf vote as to my mind Zchinque playing as usually does, plus can see valid reason for voting flub

p79 - makes me laugh as don't understand how Zchinque placing first vote on flub with no explanation will start a wagon, says Zchinque explanation makes sense but no unvote from spf looks to me like mafia trying to build case and get strong town player lynched

p83 - why is rob so worried that people know he has voted

p84 - just so stupid to lynch based on that

p89 - suddenly spf thinks Zchinque might be a jester, I must be reading a different game as that makes no sense

p107 - amok posting that he's town, good to know

p121 - not sure why amok would find claim disturbing, pos trying to draw attention to himself

p126 - telika fishing

p142 - darko misinformation about most people having shared likes/dislikes, what list by tek
Posted January 28, 2014
p687 - pazzer pazzes things

;B
Posted January 28, 2014
p168 - rob trying to force info reveal

p176 - CSPVG eager for info to be shared, seems it's already been decided that info should be posted only have to decide how, not in fact the case

p203 - strange singling amok out when in my view cspvg has also twisted things. possible spf and cspvg are mafia buddies

p214 - backtracking by cspvg, second person to suggest name claim

p216 - +town telika

p218 - red going to follow clues so doesn't have to take blame when end up lynching town

p249 - makes no sense as surely best case for mafia is town lynched and all info out there

p271 + town vitek

p278 - werid pro town neutral claim and dog as well, no real presure, looks like amok is trying to get lynched possible jester

p286 - find it interesting that red belives amoks claim without a second though

p289 - amok wrong about town wanting to stay alive only mafia want to stay alive, seems to be trying to make himself look suspecious

p290 - +town spf

p292 - why would you not copy/paste, makes no sense, had amok down as town until all this crazyness started.

p293, p297 - more crazyness from amok, is either really brave mafia or jester as just can't see town making these posts

p307 - +town vitek

p312 - red, what a load of rubbish about not focusing solely on scum hunting

p315 - curious as surely if think someones mafia it shouldn't matter how many votes they have +mafia darko

p317 - red denies having gone for jmich but he did vote for him

p335 - amok lists top 3 suspects but isn't voting for any of them

p391 - amok being helpful and appearing reasonable by listing currently known info, is doing my head in trying to work out what he's up too

p392 - the crazyness seems to be catching as Telika seems fixsated on if people can ski or not, surely is clearly answered in opening post

up to p421
Posted January 28, 2014
Telika, what I meant by fooling, is that I have a tendency to believe both you and robbeasy to be town, even when you are not (I am referring to earlier games of mafia). In regards to the affiliation I am just unsure how much value to assign, as it appear some should be given, due to the enforcement policy or it could be the reverse which would make them irrelevant. For now just believe in the headlines, and consider the parenthesized a comment for myself as to what I am currently considering.

Also sorry joe, I believe that was my first slip of the tongue - primarily due to not actually meaning it in the "must not be named" connection, but more in the; what must not be named that was talked about person".
Pages:
1
25
44
45
46
47
48
75
100
125
143
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussion (archive)GOG Mafia #19 - A slalom Mafia(2133 posts)(2133 posts)
(2133 posts)