Posted January 28, 2014
P1na
Wandering fruit
P1na Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2012
From Spain
Telika
Registered: Apr 2012
From Switzerland
amok
FREEEEDOOOM!!!!
amok Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From United Kingdom
Posted January 28, 2014
Telika: A bit confused by two points :
Telika: You assume that scum like scum, or scum and town like different people, or ?...
I really don't get this direct like/dislike-based scumhunting (as if these would straightforward map affiliations), and I've even mentionned it as part of my reasons to vote nmillar (serious scumpointing based on "roleplay" ?).
I wouldn't be surprised to be nightkilled by someone I "like", or even someone who "likes" me, not to mention someone who claims to. Likewise, given the flavor, I don't expect my "dislike" to be scum.
(Okay, I hope this is whithin the undefined lines of authorised discussions, as not close to saying who my likes and dislikes are. :-/ The "close to discuss clues!" -me!?- freaked me out a bit.)
I never thought those-which-will-not-be-named would have anything to do with allegiance, but as a way of figuring out who is who after knowing the-other-things-which-will-not-be-named.Telika: You assume that scum like scum, or scum and town like different people, or ?...
I really don't get this direct like/dislike-based scumhunting (as if these would straightforward map affiliations), and I've even mentionned it as part of my reasons to vote nmillar (serious scumpointing based on "roleplay" ?).
I wouldn't be surprised to be nightkilled by someone I "like", or even someone who "likes" me, not to mention someone who claims to. Likewise, given the flavor, I don't expect my "dislike" to be scum.
(Okay, I hope this is whithin the undefined lines of authorised discussions, as not close to saying who my likes and dislikes are. :-/ The "close to discuss clues!" -me!?- freaked me out a bit.)
JoeSapphire
Consultant Liar
JoeSapphire Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jun 2011
From United Kingdom
Posted January 28, 2014
no no no!
no no no no no no!!
no no no no no no no no no!!!
no no no no no no!!
no no no no no no no no no!!!
Post edited January 28, 2014 by JoeSapphire
amok
FREEEEDOOOM!!!!
amok Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From United Kingdom
Posted January 28, 2014
umm... I am off course talking about Lord Moldevort and the deatheaters...
P1na
Wandering fruit
P1na Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2012
From Spain
JoeSapphire
Consultant Liar
JoeSapphire Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jun 2011
From United Kingdom
Posted January 28, 2014
Vitek
Master of Karate and friendship for everyone
Vitek Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2009
From British Indian Ocean Territory
Posted January 28, 2014
P1na: mmmm.... it's kinda annoying that we can't talk about that at all. I thought the rules implied not to give extra info after day 1, not that we couldn't bring up the already public ones.
I find it quite clear: ;-) " You may freely discuss your LIKES, HATES and CLUES throughout the first voting stage (Day One), but after that LIKES, HATES and CLUES, whether they're real or falsified, whether they've been discussed in the past or not, MUST NOT BE MENTIONED. "
Hope this doesn't count. :-)
Gah, I need to check something in older games and I can imagine how the forum will work now with sale.
P1na
Wandering fruit
P1na Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2012
From Spain
Posted January 28, 2014
Vitek: I find it quite clear: ;-)
" You may freely discuss your LIKES, HATES and CLUES throughout the first voting stage (Day One), but after that LIKES, HATES and CLUES, whether they're real or falsified, whether they've been discussed in the past or not, MUST NOT BE MENTIONED. "
Hope this doesn't count. :-)
Gah, I need to check something in older games and I can imagine how the forum will work now with sale.
mmm... It's indeed clear over there. It was not so clear on the PM. No matter, we'll just not mention them from now on." You may freely discuss your LIKES, HATES and CLUES throughout the first voting stage (Day One), but after that LIKES, HATES and CLUES, whether they're real or falsified, whether they've been discussed in the past or not, MUST NOT BE MENTIONED. "
Hope this doesn't count. :-)
Gah, I need to check something in older games and I can imagine how the forum will work now with sale.
amok
FREEEEDOOOM!!!!
amok Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From United Kingdom
Posted January 28, 2014
Vitek: I find it quite clear: ;-)
" You may freely discuss your LIKES, HATES and CLUES throughout the first voting stage (Day One), but after that LIKES, HATES and CLUES, whether they're real or falsified, whether they've been discussed in the past or not, MUST NOT BE MENTIONED. "
Hope this doesn't count. :-)
Gah, I need to check something in older games and I can imagine how the forum will work now with sale.
P1na: mmm... It's indeed clear over there. It was not so clear on the PM. No matter, we'll just not mention them from now on. " You may freely discuss your LIKES, HATES and CLUES throughout the first voting stage (Day One), but after that LIKES, HATES and CLUES, whether they're real or falsified, whether they've been discussed in the past or not, MUST NOT BE MENTIONED. "
Hope this doesn't count. :-)
Gah, I need to check something in older games and I can imagine how the forum will work now with sale.
P1na
Wandering fruit
P1na Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2012
From Spain
pazzer
Wildcard
pazzer Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2009
From United Kingdom
Posted January 28, 2014
p7 - red just blurting out info :(
p9 - like that amok trying to start discussion about that which can no longer be talked about
p20 - jmich after an early mass claim, just blurts out info without any discussion on the subject
genie well and truely out the bottle by p37 as amok making list, madness
p72 - nonsense from amok about game been a logic puzzle if that's actually the case then isn't a game of mafia
p76 - like fact darko trying to work stuff out
p77 - don't understand spf vote as to my mind Zchinque playing as usually does, plus can see valid reason for voting flub
p79 - makes me laugh as don't understand how Zchinque placing first vote on flub with no explanation will start a wagon, says Zchinque explanation makes sense but no unvote from spf looks to me like mafia trying to build case and get strong town player lynched
p83 - why is rob so worried that people know he has voted
p84 - just so stupid to lynch based on that
p89 - suddenly spf thinks Zchinque might be a jester, I must be reading a different game as that makes no sense
p107 - amok posting that he's town, good to know
p121 - not sure why amok would find claim disturbing, pos trying to draw attention to himself
p126 - telika fishing
p142 - darko misinformation about most people having shared likes/dislikes, what list by tek
p9 - like that amok trying to start discussion about that which can no longer be talked about
p20 - jmich after an early mass claim, just blurts out info without any discussion on the subject
genie well and truely out the bottle by p37 as amok making list, madness
p72 - nonsense from amok about game been a logic puzzle if that's actually the case then isn't a game of mafia
p76 - like fact darko trying to work stuff out
p77 - don't understand spf vote as to my mind Zchinque playing as usually does, plus can see valid reason for voting flub
p79 - makes me laugh as don't understand how Zchinque placing first vote on flub with no explanation will start a wagon, says Zchinque explanation makes sense but no unvote from spf looks to me like mafia trying to build case and get strong town player lynched
p83 - why is rob so worried that people know he has voted
p84 - just so stupid to lynch based on that
p89 - suddenly spf thinks Zchinque might be a jester, I must be reading a different game as that makes no sense
p107 - amok posting that he's town, good to know
p121 - not sure why amok would find claim disturbing, pos trying to draw attention to himself
p126 - telika fishing
p142 - darko misinformation about most people having shared likes/dislikes, what list by tek
my name is catte
i touch your foods
my name is catte Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Mar 2010
From United Kingdom
Posted January 28, 2014
p687 - pazzer pazzes things
;B
;B
pazzer
Wildcard
pazzer Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2009
From United Kingdom
Posted January 28, 2014
p168 - rob trying to force info reveal
p176 - CSPVG eager for info to be shared, seems it's already been decided that info should be posted only have to decide how, not in fact the case
p203 - strange singling amok out when in my view cspvg has also twisted things. possible spf and cspvg are mafia buddies
p214 - backtracking by cspvg, second person to suggest name claim
p216 - +town telika
p218 - red going to follow clues so doesn't have to take blame when end up lynching town
p249 - makes no sense as surely best case for mafia is town lynched and all info out there
p271 + town vitek
p278 - werid pro town neutral claim and dog as well, no real presure, looks like amok is trying to get lynched possible jester
p286 - find it interesting that red belives amoks claim without a second though
p289 - amok wrong about town wanting to stay alive only mafia want to stay alive, seems to be trying to make himself look suspecious
p290 - +town spf
p292 - why would you not copy/paste, makes no sense, had amok down as town until all this crazyness started.
p293, p297 - more crazyness from amok, is either really brave mafia or jester as just can't see town making these posts
p307 - +town vitek
p312 - red, what a load of rubbish about not focusing solely on scum hunting
p315 - curious as surely if think someones mafia it shouldn't matter how many votes they have +mafia darko
p317 - red denies having gone for jmich but he did vote for him
p335 - amok lists top 3 suspects but isn't voting for any of them
p391 - amok being helpful and appearing reasonable by listing currently known info, is doing my head in trying to work out what he's up too
p392 - the crazyness seems to be catching as Telika seems fixsated on if people can ski or not, surely is clearly answered in opening post
up to p421
p176 - CSPVG eager for info to be shared, seems it's already been decided that info should be posted only have to decide how, not in fact the case
p203 - strange singling amok out when in my view cspvg has also twisted things. possible spf and cspvg are mafia buddies
p214 - backtracking by cspvg, second person to suggest name claim
p216 - +town telika
p218 - red going to follow clues so doesn't have to take blame when end up lynching town
p249 - makes no sense as surely best case for mafia is town lynched and all info out there
p271 + town vitek
p278 - werid pro town neutral claim and dog as well, no real presure, looks like amok is trying to get lynched possible jester
p286 - find it interesting that red belives amoks claim without a second though
p289 - amok wrong about town wanting to stay alive only mafia want to stay alive, seems to be trying to make himself look suspecious
p290 - +town spf
p292 - why would you not copy/paste, makes no sense, had amok down as town until all this crazyness started.
p293, p297 - more crazyness from amok, is either really brave mafia or jester as just can't see town making these posts
p307 - +town vitek
p312 - red, what a load of rubbish about not focusing solely on scum hunting
p315 - curious as surely if think someones mafia it shouldn't matter how many votes they have +mafia darko
p317 - red denies having gone for jmich but he did vote for him
p335 - amok lists top 3 suspects but isn't voting for any of them
p391 - amok being helpful and appearing reasonable by listing currently known info, is doing my head in trying to work out what he's up too
p392 - the crazyness seems to be catching as Telika seems fixsated on if people can ski or not, surely is clearly answered in opening post
up to p421
Red_Baron
Best Rant Ever!
Red_Baron Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Nov 2009
From Denmark
Posted January 28, 2014
Telika, what I meant by fooling, is that I have a tendency to believe both you and robbeasy to be town, even when you are not (I am referring to earlier games of mafia). In regards to the affiliation I am just unsure how much value to assign, as it appear some should be given, due to the enforcement policy or it could be the reverse which would make them irrelevant. For now just believe in the headlines, and consider the parenthesized a comment for myself as to what I am currently considering.
Also sorry joe, I believe that was my first slip of the tongue - primarily due to not actually meaning it in the "must not be named" connection, but more in the; what must not be named that was talked about person".
Also sorry joe, I believe that was my first slip of the tongue - primarily due to not actually meaning it in the "must not be named" connection, but more in the; what must not be named that was talked about person".