You do? I don't recall you ever mentioned him.

For me, it wouldn't need to be a "mistake". It could be a generality. It could be a description of past days. I have no idea of the degree of precision or prediction to expect from that term.

If anything this makes it harder to dissociate the tracks from your habits. You should agree on how "i go to the woods every night" and "tracks appear every night" seem related.

Imagine a setting where, for instance, a jailer would have to go fetch keys and bring them back to avoid raising suspicion. One player gets the hint "every night the keys disappear". Would he discard it because "ah, it's every night, so it wouldn't account for the nights where the jailer decides to not jail anyone" ?

Well I have no mention of relatives, only the person I """" which we must not discuss - given the role I would assume the only reason to be there would be if convinced/brought along, but I can't say anything as to relatives, and only mention of other makes no mention of others with a similar name as my own.

Amok: I can only guarantee that on your current list you have at least one that is wrong :P

I don't get the Rodzaju strategy, am I missing something?

http://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_19_a_slalom_mafia/post599

Rob turned out to be wrong. SPF I was correct about.

The idea is that, as Rod provides an alibi to NMillar, his flip would clear or accuse NMillar. It would be an indirect way to flip Nmillar, without directly endangering a possible town power role.

What goes against that is that Rod is not scummy. And any impressions I had gathered are just stupid confusions. So it'd be a high leap of faith, possibly not worth it.

As for your story, could you mention maybe how related you are ?

Yeah, P1na is probably town :)

Tracks appear every morning.
And I completely disagree with what you're saying. It would still be a mistake in your example too as far as I'm concerned. All the ones we've seen so far were presented as absolute truths.

You think they are related to a daytime activity ?

Gah, that's older than I expected. I checked all current day and small bit of previous one and thought it would suffice.
While it isn't too much, I can't accuse you for completely pulling it out of your ass.

I agree to that. Gut feeling.

So,


kinda could be that, though I'd expect family link to be mentionned. JMich and Vitek, do you have something that 'beats' this ?

If not (as I suppose day will end around midnight ?), I'll come back in half an hour to drop a character name. Would have preferred a player identification without it, though.

No relatives mentioned in my PM, living or otherwise.

Okay. Midnight here, so I won't take the chance to wait longer (if NMillar was town, I'd postpone the discussion to tomorrow as, if i remember well, he implied he'd re-jail me, but as I don't trust him much, better be safe than sorry).

I have flavor-based reasons to assume that Constance Drabble is townie. It's not a certitude, and I'd say it's a bit weaker weaker than NMillar's alibi (if Rod/Twilight didn't lie), but I'd still use it as a most probable work hypothesis.

That's all for today on my side. Let's see if Darko's weird superability is confirmed. Also, just in case, remember lavender.

I suppose that's all. Weird end of day.

Interesting.
Constance Drabble is the person I was talking about....