It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
amok: hmm.. good point. I have had Telika as one of my high candidates for scum, and I would also be happy to get behind a wagon on him...
You do? I don't recall you ever mentioned him.
avatar
DarkoD13: if you do believe that "every" is a mistake,
For me, it wouldn't need to be a "mistake". It could be a generality. It could be a description of past days. I have no idea of the degree of precision or prediction to expect from that term.

If anything this makes it harder to dissociate the tracks from your habits. You should agree on how "i go to the woods every night" and "tracks appear every night" seem related.

Imagine a setting where, for instance, a jailer would have to go fetch keys and bring them back to avoid raising suspicion. One player gets the hint "every night the keys disappear". Would he discard it because "ah, it's every night, so it wouldn't account for the nights where the jailer decides to not jail anyone" ?
avatar
Telika: -snip-
As for the reluctant relative thing, no, it's not that indeed. I would expect either Vitek, JMich or Red_Baron to respond then (or at least understand what it's about). So what I'm saying is that one of them has a high flavor-based probability to be town.
Well I have no mention of relatives, only the person I """" which we must not discuss - given the role I would assume the only reason to be there would be if convinced/brought along, but I can't say anything as to relatives, and only mention of other makes no mention of others with a similar name as my own.

Amok: I can only guarantee that on your current list you have at least one that is wrong :P

I don't get the Rodzaju strategy, am I missing something?
avatar
amok: hmm.. good point. I have had Telika as one of my high candidates for scum, and I would also be happy to get behind a wagon on him...
avatar
Vitek: You do? I don't recall you ever mentioned him.
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_19_a_slalom_mafia/post599

Rob turned out to be wrong. SPF I was correct about.
avatar
Red_Baron: I don't get the Rodzaju strategy, am I missing something?
The idea is that, as Rod provides an alibi to NMillar, his flip would clear or accuse NMillar. It would be an indirect way to flip Nmillar, without directly endangering a possible town power role.

What goes against that is that Rod is not scummy. And any impressions I had gathered are just stupid confusions. So it'd be a high leap of faith, possibly not worth it.

As for your story, could you mention maybe how related you are ?
avatar
Red_Baron: Amok: I can only guarantee that on your current list you have at least one that is wrong :P
Yeah, P1na is probably town :)
avatar
Telika: "i go to the woods every night" and "tracks appear every night" seem related
Tracks appear every morning.
And I completely disagree with what you're saying. It would still be a mistake in your example too as far as I'm concerned. All the ones we've seen so far were presented as absolute truths.
avatar
Telika: "i go to the woods every night" and "tracks appear every night" seem related
avatar
DarkoD13: Tracks appear every morning.
You think they are related to a daytime activity ?
avatar
amok: http://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_19_a_slalom_mafia/post599

Rob turned out to be wrong. SPF I was correct about.
Gah, that's older than I expected. I checked all current day and small bit of previous one and thought it would suffice.
While it isn't too much, I can't accuse you for completely pulling it out of your ass.
avatar
amok: Yeah, P1na is probably town :)
I agree to that. Gut feeling.
So,


avatar
Telika: -snip-
As for the reluctant relative thing, no, it's not that indeed. I would expect either Vitek, JMich or Red_Baron to respond then (or at least understand what it's about). So what I'm saying is that one of them has a high flavor-based probability to be town.
avatar
Red_Baron: Well I have no mention of relatives, only the person I """" which we must not discuss - given the role I would assume the only reason to be there would be if convinced/brought along, but I can't say anything as to relatives, and only mention of other makes no mention of others with a similar name as my own.
kinda could be that, though I'd expect family link to be mentionned. JMich and Vitek, do you have something that 'beats' this ?

If not (as I suppose day will end around midnight ?), I'll come back in half an hour to drop a character name. Would have preferred a player identification without it, though.
avatar
Telika: I kinda could be that, though I'd expect family link to be mentionned. JMich and Vitek, do you have something that 'beats' this ?
No relatives mentioned in my PM, living or otherwise.
Okay. Midnight here, so I won't take the chance to wait longer (if NMillar was town, I'd postpone the discussion to tomorrow as, if i remember well, he implied he'd re-jail me, but as I don't trust him much, better be safe than sorry).

I have flavor-based reasons to assume that Constance Drabble is townie. It's not a certitude, and I'd say it's a bit weaker weaker than NMillar's alibi (if Rod/Twilight didn't lie), but I'd still use it as a most probable work hypothesis.

That's all for today on my side. Let's see if Darko's weird superability is confirmed. Also, just in case, remember lavender.

I suppose that's all. Weird end of day.
Wait, the Day ends or what?

Are you kidding me?
Why have nobody told me?
Don't you know I don't follow such things?

And this is it?
Another awful day. 3rd in this game.
Why are we still playing?!
4 people don't even bother to vote. Some of them all Day I would guess.
avatar
Telika: Okay. Midnight here, so I won't take the chance to wait longer (if NMillar was town, I'd postpone the discussion to tomorrow as, if i remember well, he implied he'd re-jail me, but as I don't trust him much, better be safe than sorry).

I have flavor-based reasons to assume that Constance Drabble is townie. It's not a certitude, and I'd say it's a bit weaker weaker than NMillar's alibi (if Rod/Twilight didn't lie), but I'd still use it as a most probable work hypothesis.

That's all for today on my side. Let's see if Darko's weird superability is confirmed. Also, just in case, remember lavender.

I suppose that's all. Weird end of day.
Interesting.
Constance Drabble is the person I was talking about....