I do apologise for not posting in three days, I didn't think that it had been all that long.

Firstly, Unvote: JoeSapphire. Contrary to his assertion in post 643, I did not vote for him due to the possible vig or what ever we may have( although I do suspect him of having some sort of role), but rather because he had not posted since the start of this game-day.

Secondly, from to address something I should have awhile ago( this being prompted by Joe's mention of it in post 631): The second bit of flavour seemed insignificant to me, as I am still very much in the mentality of our last game. I thought it was just an odd bit of flavour I'd received, perhaps something we'd all gotten.

Also, as and aside, the possibility of a poisoner does not make sense with the flavour give for either of last night's deaths. One of our players( Darko, I would assume), was thrown overboard, as he seems to simply have vanished. The other death( Vitek), resulted from what seems to be a brutal beating and a slit throat.

Continuing this aside, I had forgotten how violent the flavour for night one's kill was. I had been operating under the assumption that the disappearances over the side were the doing of the mafia, and that the violent deaths had been caused by a vigilante or serial killer. So I'm rather at a loss about whom I suspect of being a vig or serial killer.

Moving on: Amok gets some town points, at least in my book, for making a valid attempt to communicate with us using song lyrics. I would, however, like to ask him to answer the first question Joe posed him in post 631.

Furthermore, Robbeasy has been acting suspect of late. In fact, starting with yesterday's hammer, he's been sketchy for quite some time. I do, however, find his," The mafia could have quicklynched Joe, so why haven't they?" logic to be, for the most part, convincing. I would, however, first like to have more conversation before we lynch someone.

Lastly, does anyone think that a mass claim would be of any benefit at this point?