DarkoD13: On a side note, I would also be interested to know why you changed your mind about lynching anyone just before the deadline. I was under the impression that you were against it due to your "personal convictions" and, well, the odds.
I changed my mind :)
Reason - odds and game theory. The odds are in favor of getting a scum in a random lynch over a no lynch (0.27 against 0), so if there has to be a night, game theory there fore states that it is best to take the path where the odds are highest for success. In this case it means that to play the game smart, it is better to lynch someone randomly than not at all.
Reason - speed up the game. Removing 2 players instead of 1 would speed up the game, and it have been going a little bit slow, I feel? not sure if it is just me. It also helps with the odds at the next night if there need to be a new random lynch (0.33 vs 0.3 respectively), so there is just a greater chance to 'hit' a scum. There is also less townies they can hide behind. Flip-side is off course that they are 1 person closer to winning, but in the beginning I do think the odds are very much in towns favor to do so.
Reason - information. Kind of related to game theory. Having just the night kill might have left us with very little information (and indeed it did...). Having another killing (the lynch) on top of this may give us something more to work with, be the dead person town or scum. More information is good at this point, so as a worst case scenario it would have been a sacrifice of one townie to get that extra bit of info at the beginning.
The personal conviction is that it just feel bad to accuse someone and kill them for no other good reason than that it will most likely bring the game forward, so they are silly personal reasons (connected to the same reasons why I do not do PvP in games much...). So, yeah, I choose the game over personal reasons in the end.