It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
cjrgreen: Given the tremendous frequency of fraudulent attempts to charge phished credit or debit cards, I'm not surprised at all. If the transaction turns out to be fraudulent, the bank must make good the money fraudulently taken from your account and has not a snowball's chance in Hell of recovering from the fraudster.

Middlemen really hate losing money on transactions, and if they see that a certain type of transaction is frequently the subject of an attempted or successful fraud, they will refuse to handle that kind of transaction. Thinking that sort of thing would be illegal is at best naive.
avatar
GameRager: I would boycott such behavior then, and get another bank asap. If not illegal that kind of behavior seems at the very least like utter bullshite.
If you have cash money in your pocket, it is your money, and you are free to use it as you please.

Put that money in a bank or buy a payment card with it, and the rules change. It's not just your money, it's a liability that the bank is responsible for. They have to take that responsibility seriously, and that includes making sure it does not get paid out under conditions where they are not certain it is being paid out under your valid order.

Because they have approximately a trillion times the experience that you or I do with recognizing what is or isn't an attempt to defraud them, arguing with them will get you nowhere. Your recourse is just what you said it is: take your business elsewhere, preferably to an issuer whose rules are compatible with the transactions you intend to make.
Post edited December 20, 2011 by cjrgreen
avatar
GameRager: I would boycott such behavior then, and get another bank asap. If not illegal that kind of behavior seems at the very least like utter bullshite.
avatar
cjrgreen: If you have cash money in your pocket, it is your money, and you are free to use it as you please.

Put that money in a bank or buy a payment card with it, and the rules change. It's not just your money, it's a liability that the bank is responsible for. They have to take that responsibility seriously, and that includes making sure it does not get paid out under conditions where they are not certain it is being paid out under your valid order.

Because they have approximately a trillion times the experience that you or I do with recognizing what is or isn't an attempt to defraud them, arguing with them will get you nowhere.
Yes but if you then tell them you ok the money going out and they are notified it isn't fraud and they still don't do it then it's not them covering their asses anymore.
avatar
cjrgreen: If you have cash money in your pocket, it is your money, and you are free to use it as you please.

Put that money in a bank or buy a payment card with it, and the rules change. It's not just your money, it's a liability that the bank is responsible for. They have to take that responsibility seriously, and that includes making sure it does not get paid out under conditions where they are not certain it is being paid out under your valid order.

Because they have approximately a trillion times the experience that you or I do with recognizing what is or isn't an attempt to defraud them, arguing with them will get you nowhere.
avatar
GameRager: Yes but if you then tell them you ok the money going out and they are notified it isn't fraud and they still don't do it then it's not them covering their asses anymore.
When it's an Internet transaction in a country where payment card fraud is common, how the Hell do they know it's you?
avatar
GameRager: Yes but if you then tell them you ok the money going out and they are notified it isn't fraud and they still don't do it then it's not them covering their asses anymore.
avatar
cjrgreen: When it's an Internet transaction in a country where payment card fraud is common, how the Hell do they know it's you?
Um, because you told them the exact time frame/amount/etc beforehand so they know it's you making it?
avatar
cjrgreen: When it's an Internet transaction in a country where payment card fraud is common, how the Hell do they know it's you?
avatar
GameRager: Um, because you told them the exact time frame/amount/etc beforehand so they know it's you making it?
You get into an infinite regress this way. How do they know it was you who told them?Fraudsters are really good at knowing enough about you to impersonate you well enough to authorize a transaction.

Your recourse is still what you said it was: take the kind of business you want to do to a card issuer who does that kind of business. The ones who don't, well, it's their loss.
Post edited December 20, 2011 by cjrgreen
avatar
GameRager: Um, because you told them the exact time frame/amount/etc beforehand so they know it's you making it?
avatar
cjrgreen: You get into an infinite regress this way. How do they know it was you who told them?Fraudsters are really good at knowing enough about you to impersonate you well enough to authorize a transaction.
Banks can be careful to a point, then it becomes paranoia. Most banks a-ok a transaction based on you identifying yourself properly(SS number, security questions, etc) and this should be enough, when combined with the transaction info you want pre-approved to go through, for such to pass through without incident.. If it isn't i'd just change banks to one that isn't such a dick to it's customers.
avatar
GameRager: I find it hard to believe that such preferential blocking of legitimate sales(especially if you're using a debit card linked to your own money) can be legal.
That's exactly how I feel about Steam.
avatar
GameRager: I find it hard to believe that such preferential blocking of legitimate sales(especially if you're using a debit card linked to your own money) can be legal.
avatar
MonstaMunch: That's exactly how I feel about Steam.
It seems big corps will always find loopholes to exploit to be able to discriminate in who they do business with or how, even if it's with your own money.
avatar
cjrgreen: You can disagree all you like. Won't do anything to get Visa to allow you to use your CC under conditions where the issuer has decided they will not do business because of the risk of fraud. Whether this makes a lie of their advertising is of little concern to them and probably affords you no way to seek redress.

Pretty much all Visa card issuers now have country block lists. Each one has its own. Some of these are really damn extreme; I'm looking at one that reads "Mexico, Turkey, Thailand, Croatia, Nigeria, Bangladesh, South Africa, Honduras, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Pakistan, Ukraine, Singapore, Hong Kong, Spain, Taiwan, Russian Federation, Romania, Italy, Australia." (Frontier Community Credit Union, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas) Lists like this usually mean that the issuer will automatically decline any transaction from a merchant located in these countries. Not just require additional verification. Decline, period, no recourse other than changing card issuers. Worst case, they can freeze your card for an attempted transaction that crosses their fraud threshold.

Credit unions are the worst for this. Prepaid Visa issuers are right behind. Commercial banks, which are more used to international transactions, are generally less restrictive. But, sad to say, none of them violate Visa policy. Indeed, I expect Visa policy and their contracts with these issuers require them to maintain fraud prevention programs.
Doesn't matter what the contract says, fraud is illegal and they can't claim that Visa or Mastercard logo cards are accepted everywhere that the logo is shown if they allow such vast lists of places to be barred, but yet have legitimate use of the logo.

Yes, they do have to have fraud prevention programs, but allowing the CC companies to decide with whom I do business is really bad for companies that claim otherwise.

We've already seen massive abuse, if there were a viable alternative I'd be using it as quite frankly it's disgusting the way that they cut off WIkileaks from legitimate donations as soon as it sounded like they were going to be targeted.
avatar
GameRager: Yes but if you then tell them you ok the money going out and they are notified it isn't fraud and they still don't do it then it's not them covering their asses anymore.
avatar
cjrgreen: When it's an Internet transaction in a country where payment card fraud is common, how the Hell do they know it's you?
The same way that they do under other circumstances. I get that your pro-corporate, but at some point it gets absurd. If the CC can't keep the authentication details under wraps enough to be able to make that call, then they sure as hell aren't going to ever be able to verify a transaction as legitimate regardless of whom the money is going to.
Post edited December 20, 2011 by hedwards