NotFrenchYet: You call this slow?!

NotFrenchYet: Yes, but "snip" =/= "blah blah". Just a friendly warning that "blah blah" is far more open to negative interpretation (and therefore antagonism and/or confusion) than "snip" or "[...]"


NotFrenchYet: ??? "Take as you will" is effectively throwing wine in our faces...

NotFrenchYet: I'm getting itchy to launch my vote... First Vitek and now Rod have made cases against you which you have dealt with rather strangely... To Vitek you basically just said "Yep, that's all true." With Rod you exploded, and there are pages and pages of knots and tangles...

The deadline is next Thursday by the way, so you've still got time :)

muttly13: Rod began with misquotes and interpretations of those. Since both were incorrect, I am forced to respond to not allow falsehoods to mysteriously become fact. Rod also chooses specific words or phrases and take them completely out of context to fit his accusation, another thing i must defend for the same reason. And finally, he dodges counter theories with "hes scum" or outright ignoring them. The latest being how his own line of thinking is exactly like mine (in his written word at least) on Orry yet he remains lily white.

I thought it was the 20th? Ahh, okay then. Well, I will still be gone this weekend if anyone is wondering!

muttly13: There are entire posts were you paraphrase incorrectly and then build your "case" on your incorrect transpositions. I have pointed out each one as you have made them. At least the ones I caught.

muttly13: Anyone who has read my responses has seen them. I refuse to get into a hunt and peck competition with you because of your attempt to shift the responsibility on me. But, for sake of you somehow warping that into an anti-town stance, most of this town cop debate was started with you originally mis-paraphrasing me. Even when you were "quoting"... 734 or so I believe that particular event started.

muttly13: Nothing all day and night and then just the three of us with zero yesterday? Yeah, I was tempted to go with slow :).

Rodzaju: So you won't prove me wrong...
Or is that can't?

muttly13: Let me break it down, Rod Style!!! (Heavy D, anyone, anyone, Buehler?)

1 - Bogus challenge he can prove himself in 30 seconds.
2 - Shifts responsibility of making an actual argument to me.
3 - When i respond with and example, it is ignored.
4 - Declare further suspision due to not responding to baiting.

I mean, if you guys cant see this for what it is nothing I say will change anything.

muttly13: I cant be the only one confused by this can I? Anyway, on to my point...

Vitek: I support muttly on this one. There are 3 palyers with no post in last 2 days. I wouldn't call this fast game progress. Yes, there are outburst of activity, mostly when Rod and NFY are active but otherwise it's crawling. This way we can already vote nolynch (it is not vote, it's part of sentence! It would be bolded if I voted. :-P) and do the same as soon as next day starts because it's only possible outcome we can get.
I don't want to wait this out until inevitable end.

littlerabbit: I didn't use it night one.
This was because the likelihood of me finding anything useful with 12 people to choose from and absolutely no data was very low. I did consider examining Pazzer due to the baker thing, but figured if I just got an oven glove or something I would have wasted my ability.
It seemed to me like it was more of a one-shot role, because of the restrictions, and because frankly I didn't expect to survive until D4! In this situation it would have been prudent of me to hold my ability until it had maximum impact.
On N1 (with no lynch) the chances of me stealing from Mafia were 3/11 (assuming there are three mafia; and not including myself because there would be little to gain from investigating myself, and I'm not mafia- but you can believe what you will about that). I would then have had to have waited until N4 to investigate again, my chances of dying before N4 were 1/12 +1/9 + 1/10 + 1/8 = 0.4(ish) which is almost a half! i.e. I had 50% chance of living to use my ability again; and I would have gained useful information with a probablility of only 3/11; i.e. mafia steal. OR i would have stolen from someone who later died or was lynched before i could investigate again. i.e. 1/9 + 1/12... which is 0.4 again

On N2 with a lynch and more data, the chances were 3/10 of stealing mafia, I saw this as a heftier possibility, when accounting for the probability of me being NKed the next night (1/7). If I survived this the chances of my target being alive the next day were also 1/7 if he were town and 1 if he were mafia (assuming we have no serial killer or vig). This seemed to me like a better risk, plus if i didn't claim I may have still had the chance of another investigation, whereas if I'd waited until N3 this likelihood plummets.

littlerabbit: yeah where did Xyem go anyway?