I think he means post 56.

But a no lynch is basically giving the mafia a chance to pick one of us off, and doesn't give us anything to go on, no claims, no reactions to claims, and it hurts us during the next day.

We need the vote counts from each day in a way that they're useful (by something getting done, and for us to see where our mob hunt is going). A Mafia that keeps pushing for mislynches is going to find themselves a target because everyone's going to be able to go back and realize 'Hey, this guy kept pushing for these, let's see how he handles the pressure!'

unvote NotFrenchYet, vote TwilightBard

Because bards are just too...bardy....

Which was far less 'waving towniness' as the post I was replying to, which came out of nowhere and was far more strongly worded than mine.

I noted how bazilisek didn't even argue against my point or voice his own opinion on mine or TwilightBard's comment, just voted for me while ignoring TwilightBard.

So why am I being targetted? Did I start arguing with your accomplice there bazilisek?

Unvote NotFrenchYet.
Vote bazilisek.

Ahh nothing like sitting down after a hard day's work with some food, deciding whether I should change my lynch vote...

Reposting to meet Joe's random post restrictions..

xclip -o | perl -pe 's/(?<=b)a/aa/gi' | xclip -i

Let's see now... Xyem, Vitam and TwilightBard are all protesting against the deadline. Hmm. Primal tried to sidetrack us by pointing attention at littlerabbit... TwilightBard's repeated use of "we" is interesting...

Unvote : Orryyrro
Vote : pazzar

So you are voting for me for arguing against something you suggested which is anti-town in nature?

I think I can leave my vote there on that point alone.

Time limits are not inherently anti-town; only if they are too short. And they are definitely pro-game, which is why I suggested them, remembering the fate of M7 and particularly M6. And I sent that suggestion to Joe, by the way, well before the game even started, and I couldn't have known what role I was going to get.

It's Vítek, not Vitam. ;-) (and pazzer not pazzar)

I didn't say time limits were anti-town. I said time limits 'despite plenty of positive activity' were anti-town.

For giving Joe the stupid idea of fixed deadlines at the start of each day unvote no lynch, vote Bazilisek

For stealing my faultless logic, unvote basilisek and revote Pazzer

OMGUS unvote Bazilisek, vote SirPrimalform