It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussion (archive)gog Forum Mafia #8!(1144 posts)(1144 posts)
(1144 posts)
Pages:
1
3
4
5
6
7
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
77
This is my favourite topic
Posted October 11, 2011
avatar
xyem: I'm glad it is obvious to you, because I have no idea where I did that :\
I think he means post 56.
Posted October 11, 2011
avatar
TwilightBard: The closest I am to pointing anything more then jovial 'HA! This is both entertaining and silly' are the two nolynch votes. These are bad ideas as the town should NEVER give up it's chance to get a mafia member eliminated,
avatar
xyem: On the flip side, mafia would never give up the chance to try to coax town to hit one of their own with a mislynch when the odds of mislynch is higher...
But a no lynch is basically giving the mafia a chance to pick one of us off, and doesn't give us anything to go on, no claims, no reactions to claims, and it hurts us during the next day.

We need the vote counts from each day in a way that they're useful (by something getting done, and for us to see where our mob hunt is going). A Mafia that keeps pushing for mislynches is going to find themselves a target because everyone's going to be able to go back and realize 'Hey, this guy kept pushing for these, let's see how he handles the pressure!'
Posted October 11, 2011
unvote NotFrenchYet, vote TwilightBard

Because bards are just too...bardy....
Posted October 11, 2011
avatar
Orryyrro: I think he means post 56.
Which was far less 'waving towniness' as the post I was replying to, which came out of nowhere and was far more strongly worded than mine.

I noted how bazilisek didn't even argue against my point or voice his own opinion on mine or TwilightBard's comment, just voted for me while ignoring TwilightBard.

So why am I being targetted? Did I start arguing with your accomplice there bazilisek?

Unvote NotFrenchYet.
Vote bazilisek.
Posted October 11, 2011
Ahh nothing like sitting down after a hard day's work with some food, deciding whether I should change my lynch vote...
Posted October 11, 2011
Reposting to meet Joe's random post restrictions..

xclip -o | perl -pe 's/(?<=b)a/aa/gi' | xclip -i

avatar
Orryyrro: I think he means post 56.
Which was far less 'waving towniness' as the post I was replying to, which came out of nowhere and was far more strongly worded than mine.

I noted how baazilisek didn't even argue against my point or voice his own opinion on mine or TwilightBaard's comment, just voted for me while ignoring TwilightBaard.

So why am I being targetted? Did I start arguing with your accomplice there baazilisek?

Unvote NotFrenchYet.
Vote baazilisek.
Posted October 11, 2011
Let's see now... Xyem, Vitam and TwilightBard are all protesting against the deadline. Hmm. Primal tried to sidetrack us by pointing attention at littlerabbit... TwilightBard's repeated use of "we" is interesting...

Unvote : Orryyrro
Vote : pazzar
Posted October 11, 2011
avatar
xyem: Isn't controlling the length of day, despite plenty of positive activity, really unfair on town?

I can understand if there is no/little activity but a deadline during any other situation is just being anti-town by cutting the discussion short :/
I meant this, actually.
Posted October 11, 2011
avatar
bazilisek: I meant this, actually.
So you are voting for me for arguing against something you suggested which is anti-town in nature?

I think I can leave my vote there on that point alone.
Posted October 11, 2011
avatar
xyem: So you are voting for me for arguing against something you suggested which is anti-town in nature?
Time limits are not inherently anti-town; only if they are too short. And they are definitely pro-game, which is why I suggested them, remembering the fate of M7 and particularly M6. And I sent that suggestion to Joe, by the way, well before the game even started, and I couldn't have known what role I was going to get.
Posted October 11, 2011
avatar
NotFrenchYet: Let's see now... Xyem, Vitam and TwilightBard are all protesting against the deadline.
It's Vítek, not Vitam. ;-) (and pazzer not pazzar)
Posted October 11, 2011
avatar
bazilisek: Time limits are not inherently anti-town; only if they are too short. And they are definitely pro-game, which is why I suggested them, remembering the fate of M7 and particularly M6. And I sent that suggestion to Joe, by the way, well before the game even started, and I couldn't have known what role I was going to get.
I didn't say time limits were anti-town. I said time limits 'despite plenty of positive activity' were anti-town.
Posted October 11, 2011
For giving Joe the stupid idea of fixed deadlines at the start of each day unvote no lynch, vote Bazilisek
Posted October 11, 2011
avatar
pazzer: For giving Joe the stupid idea of fixed deadlines at the start of each day unvote no lynch, vote Bazilisek
For stealing my faultless logic, unvote basilisek and revote Pazzer
Posted October 11, 2011
OMGUS unvote Bazilisek, vote SirPrimalform
Pages:
1
3
4
5
6
7
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
77
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussion (archive)gog Forum Mafia #8!(1144 posts)(1144 posts)
(1144 posts)