Posted October 13, 2011
NotFrenchYet: So bazilisek's reasoning is flawed because Xyem doesn't like things being unfair.
... Wait, what? Clear that up for us?
bazilisek: It's fairly simple. The post of xyem's that started all this silliness contained "Isn't controlling the length of day, despite plenty of positive activity, really unfair on town?" ... Wait, what? Clear that up for us?
Xyem simply says that this sentence is not softclaiming town, which is what my accusation was, but only insisting on the game being fair, regardless of his own role in it. Which would mean the accusation was based on a wrong interpretation, and therefore faulty.
(Did that make sense?)
I keep wondering, though, if there is any meaningful difference between a reaction to a vote and a reaction to an accusation, and I can't think of any.