It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Siannah: Last but not least: a lot of the "regulars" posting on codex have rather.... strange.... views on what's right and what not. Mostly they're just hilarious.

That's putting it lightly.
Pirates,pirates never change.
Post edited March 18, 2010 by lackoo1111
avatar
Sielle: Aren't these the same guys that got pissed because abandonware sites removed games (specifically the M&M collection) from their sites after GOG started selling them? GOG didn't contact the sites at all, they made the decision on their own (and the correct one IMO).

Yes and yes. Same guys, right decision. It's really just a bunch of crybabies who gotten mad because they no longer could get it for free, ignoring the point what the difference between an Abandonware- and a warez-site is.
avatar
lackoo1111: "Only morons give money to GOG"
How nice.
*angry*

Nothing new here.
RPGCodex R TEH COOLEST GUYZ!!1
I still don't get why GOG actually set up affiliation with them. GOG really should set higher standards for themselves.
NO, NO !! IT WAS ME WHAT DID IT . . . I HAVE PROOF GOG USED MY WORK !!
I WANT CREDIT AND I WANT IT NOW !!!
Attachments:
itwasme.jpg (383 Kb)
avatar
chautemoc: Heh heh Ubisoft...

LOL yeah.
avatar
Stuff: NO, NO !! IT WAS ME WHAT DID IT . . . I HAVE PROOF GOG USED MY WORK !!
I WANT CREDIT AND I WANT IT NOW !!!

That was in the code? That would certainly explain a few things... :P
Post edited March 18, 2010 by Navagon
avatar
Navagon: That was in the code? That would certainly explain a few things... :P

It is vewy vewy hard to remove DRM, I recognize my work any where . . .=P
Remember guys, in most cases the cracks are perfectly legal. Especially if a game has invasive DRM, since, at least in North America you are allowed to modify software enough to make it usable, and sometimes that requires removing CD checks.
Distribution of said software not so legal though.
Can someone tell me why this matters? I ask this every time some publisher uses a warez crack to remove the DRM from the game, but no one has given me a good reason.
avatar
PoSSeSSeDCoW: Can someone tell me why this matters? I ask this every time some publisher uses a warez crack to remove the DRM from the game, but no one has given me a good reason.

Because they don't give attribution to the crackers. Might be an authorship infringement by the publishers but I surely don't know about the paranoid U.S. law. They just should keep their ACTA at home if they need it at all.
avatar
PoSSeSSeDCoW: Can someone tell me why this matters? I ask this every time some publisher uses a warez crack to remove the DRM from the game, but no one has given me a good reason.
avatar
Protoss: Because they don't give attribution to the crackers. Might be an authorship infringement by the publishers but I surely don't know about the paranoid U.S. law. They just should keep their ACTA at home if they need it at all.

IIRC, you can't sue in defense of something or claim ownership upon that violates the law. These cracks violate the DMCA by removing the DRM without the consent of the publisher. Furthermore, you also can't claim ownership, unless it's in the public domain, on something that you modify without the owner's consent. If I took the first Harry Potter book, changed every instance of the word "the" to the word "frog" and tried to enforce copyright if the publisher took my work, I would get laughed out of court, with good reason.
avatar
Protoss: Because they don't give attribution to the crackers. Might be an authorship infringement by the publishers but I surely don't know about the paranoid U.S. law. They just should keep their ACTA at home if they need it at all.

So basically it's martens complaining about eggthieves? Yeah, that's understandable. Oh wait...
avatar
PoSSeSSeDCoW: If I took the first Harry Potter book, changed every instance of the word "the" to the word "frog" and tried to enforce copyright if the publisher took my work, I would get laughed out of court, with good reason.

Change every instance of the word "wand" to the word "wang" and they'll have an even better reason. ^^
Yeah. This is a non-issue. [See my response on codex thread].
On the other discussion: As much as I disagree - politically - with codex (and I always have, despite donating to the page way back when it was a little more focused on quality content), I do think it does have a purpose. Less now than it used to, maybe, but there is, among all the drivel, valuable discussion.