Licurg: That's the problem - it's painless(or at least, that's what they say). In Vlad Tepes' time, someone like this filth would've been impaled in such a way as to avoid the internal organs, so the scum would die slowly over the course of hours or, as some scholars write, up to 2 days. That's what this vermin would've deserved, that's what he would've got in a normal society.
lukaszthegreat: in vlad's times those people would not be punished for those crimes.
unless he killed nobles.
if he was rich he would be able to kill rape without any consequences (lesser class of people of course)
You obviously don't know much about history. In Vlad Tepes' time,
all crime, regardless of who the victim was, was punishable by impalement. You could leave a bag of gold in the middle of any town for days, come back, and it would still be there. Don't confuse the east with the west, things here were very different in that time.
Licurg: That's the problem - it's painless(or at least, that's what they say). In Vlad Tepes' time, someone like this filth would've been impaled in such a way as to avoid the internal organs, so the scum would die slowly over the course of hours or, as some scholars write, up to 2 days. That's what this vermin would've deserved, that's what he would've got in a normal society.
wizardtypething: What does suffering accomplish if it's memory and experience is obliterated upon death?
Removing dangerous elements from society seems to be entirely more useful than some metaphysical concept of 'justice'.
Making the scum suffer would deter at least some of the people who might consider doing things like this, and would be a comfort for the families of the victims, knowing they got as much pain as their loved ones.
