N0x0ss: It's obvious that laying "traps" for mafia is part of the game..
When a Townie for instance proposes a no-lynch at day 1, it may be he's gauging players reactions ... and he never really wanted a no-lynch majority.
Actually, laying traps for mafia isn't part of the game, especially not in Day 1. To properly lay a trap you need to have information, which usually means either a track result or a cop result. You can't judge reactions easily, you can judge actions and posts. So for example if I say "Hm, why would Vitek turn up dead after you visited him last night?" and you answer "I wasn't. I don't have a night action", by revealing myself as a tracker and saying that I did track you last night and you did visit Vitek, you are automatically moved up to the scum list as next to lynch (alongside me of course). If I do the same thing without any evidence to support it, it's your word that you didn't visit against mine that you did visit. If I had acted as suspiciously as you have so far, I wouldn't be able to convince anyone that you are the killer.
Also
N0x0ss: It's not the information... It's the impact it would've done.
The way you deliver a message is "I believe" as strong as its content.
The above strikes me quite badly as another attempt to manipulate the town. And you've already claimed in
post 70 that you think townies should manipulate other townies.
Basic concept for townies is to never lie. Scum will lie, and if town also lies, town will get lynched. TwilightBard posted the same thing back in
post 87.
Also, add to it the fact that you still haven't answered CSPVG's question of
post 297, even though he asked you again.
Still waiting for more insight by Quadralien before deciding if I'll have to switch vote.