Sogi-Ya: if you actually read the Joysiq & RPS reviews the only thing they complain about as far as the sexism stuff is that it is badly delivered and outdated to the point that most people wouldn't even get them.
and that constitutes all of 1-3 lines in those reviews, the rest of the reviews is about how shitty the game plays, it's technical issues, the retarded enemies, the worthless mini-games, the "ego" shield ... and so on. the only thing that I didn't expect was that Joystiq compared the game to bulletstorm instead of Serious Sam.
The Joystiq review definitely contained a lot more than just 1-3 lines of bad mouthing the Duke for sexism. If you actually read the article, most of what's in there is based upon the reviewers tastes and very little of it actually relates in any obvious way to the game play.
Contrast that with the review in PC Gamer which focused a lot more on the actual game rather than the asinine views of the reviewer. The reviewer at Joystiq might ultimately be right, but it's dishonest to suggest that the "review" was a review as it was more of an editorial slamming the game without really basing it on anything which the reader can measure it against.
I'm not saying that the game is necessarily good, but let's be honest about the fact that the Joystiq article was written as an editorial and not as an actual review.