It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
langurmonkey: I should of posted this here.
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/the_bitch_about_life_in_general_thread

Sorry guys.
Don't worry about it.
If you had, I would probably never have found it & would have missed the opportunity to poke fun at Dischord!

;-}
the newest thing I can run is TRA. I win the sad sad sad machine contest unless one of you is working off of a Speak N'Spell.
Hey, it's always good to be #1 at something!
avatar
tinyE: the newest thing I can run is TRA. I win the sad sad sad machine contest unless one of you is working off of a Speak N'Spell.
Hey, it's always good to be #1 at something!
TRA?
avatar
tinyE: the newest thing I can run is TRA. I win the sad sad sad machine contest unless one of you is working off of a Speak N'Spell.
Hey, it's always good to be #1 at something!
avatar
Rodzaju: TRA?
Tomb Raider Anniversary
You aren't missing a damn thing.
avatar
langurmonkey: I should of posted this here.
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/the_bitch_about_life_in_general_thread

Sorry guys.
avatar
Rodzaju: Don't worry about it.
If you had, I would probably never have found it & would have missed the opportunity to poke fun at Dischord!

;-}
Caught me with my pants down, but hey, we're countrymen of sorts... You don't really have to give me the big one; please, consider the season :-)
avatar
langurmonkey: COD World At War is poorly optimized compared to the COD games made by IW. I also have a laptop with an Intel HD 400.
Hmmm, it ran pretty fine on my not so powerful PC back there.

With my old Athlon X2 3800, 2GB RAM and a 8800GTS i could max it out easily with smooth framerates. And that wasn't a too powerful PC, even at that time.
Runs well at 1600x900, medium/high settings on my Core 2 Duo E4500, 2GB Ram and 9600GT.

Whats your PC's specs? Try turning down anti-aliasing etc. see if it helps.
avatar
sloganvirst: Runs well at 1600x900, medium/high settings on my Core 2 Duo E4500, 2GB Ram and 9600GT.

Whats your PC's specs? Try turning down anti-aliasing etc. see if it helps.
Inspiron 15r something
i5 3210M processor
8GB Memory
Intel HD 4000 - can run Skyrim at decent fps.

OS is Windows 7 64 bit. On the lowest settings, World At War runs like shit. My machine should be able to handle the game so it seems the game just hates my machine.
Post edited December 23, 2012 by langurmonkey
avatar
sloganvirst: Runs well at 1600x900, medium/high settings on my Core 2 Duo E4500, 2GB Ram and 9600GT.

Whats your PC's specs? Try turning down anti-aliasing etc. see if it helps.
avatar
langurmonkey: Inspiron 15r something
i5 3210M processor
8GB Memory
Intel HD 4000 - can run Skyrim at decent fps.

OS is Windows 7 64 bit. On the lowest settings, World At War runs like shit. My machine should be able to handle the game so it seems the game just hates my machine.
INtel HD 4000 can run Skyrim? What the black magic fuckery is this?
avatar
langurmonkey: Inspiron 15r something
i5 3210M processor
8GB Memory
Intel HD 4000 - can run Skyrim at decent fps.

OS is Windows 7 64 bit. On the lowest settings, World At War runs like shit. My machine should be able to handle the game so it seems the game just hates my machine.
avatar
Rohan15: INtel HD 4000 can run Skyrim? What the black magic fuckery is this?
Monkey magic.


Yes, if you lower all the settings, you can play Skyrim at around 30 fps with the Intel HD 4000. The Intel HD 4000 isn't bad.
Post edited December 24, 2012 by langurmonkey
avatar
Rohan15: INtel HD 4000 can run Skyrim? What the black magic fuckery is this?
avatar
langurmonkey: Monkey magic.


Yes, if you lower all the settings, you can play Skyrim at around 30 fps with the Intel HD 4000. The Intel HD 4000 isn't bad.
I'm still rather shocked.
avatar
langurmonkey: Monkey magic.


Yes, if you lower all the settings, you can play Skyrim at around 30 fps with the Intel HD 4000. The Intel HD 4000 isn't bad.
avatar
Rohan15: I'm still rather shocked.
Yes, a laptop that cost a little less than $700(in the USA) can run Skyrim at around 30 fps. :)
Post edited December 24, 2012 by langurmonkey
avatar
Rohan15: I'm still rather shocked.
avatar
langurmonkey: Yes, a laptop that cost a little less than $700(in the USA) can run Skyrim at around 30 fps. :) I was shocked too.
I know. 0_0
avatar
langurmonkey: Yes, a laptop that cost a little less than $700(in the USA) can run Skyrim at around 30 fps. :) I was shocked too.
avatar
Rohan15: I know. 0_0
I was shocked too. The Intel HD 4000 is not like the other integrated crap out there. I should be able to play World At War, aarrgggrhrgh!!!

This guy says he is getting around 45 fps with the Intel HD 4000.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIyOIL3NaZA
Post edited December 24, 2012 by langurmonkey