QC: Why do atheist have morals? Because humans long ago decided that hurting other humans is a dickish way to go about things. Oh, but religious worlds far back, for the past thousands of years have waged wars against other nations, other cultures, other religions for all of Humanity. They killed to serve their country. They killed to serve their gods and bring glory to their gods. The reason why we don't have that today is the world is more inter-reliant and we've come to accept cultural differences, including religious difference. A tribe does not destroy itself when it is surviving reasonably. That's regardless of religion or society.
ThoRn: Bullshit! You got you moral values from the same source I did. Your parents who were probably religious or their parents were before them and the morals were passed on from parent to child. Ever seen the movie Greystoke about the boy who was shipwrecked on an island with a bunch of chimps? The chimps raised him and years later when he was found as a grown man, he acted like a chimp. They brought him back to his families estate in the UK but he couldn't adapt to civilized society after lots of efforts to educate him and change him. But he still acted out on his chimpish ways from time to time until it was decided he needed to go back to the island and be set free with the chimps that raised him. If you had grown up with no moral religious teachings you'd adapt to the world on your own or by whoever or whatever decided to raise you, be it apes or chimps, or whatever. It's easy for you to claim that the world would have been so perfect without religion and that religion is the root of all evil when that's not true. It's the very thing that's brought people together under a set of values and customs.
Probably the first time you've actually replied to me. Guess what, humans don't need laws set upon them to act. Fucking babies will act to aid a person and act in a moral way, and anything you to say to them sounds like the same babble they speak. Can you honestly say that from day one you're teaching an infant that it's good to help a person, that it's bad to stab someone?
Since you're looking at chimps, let's look at chimps: Chimps form tribes. Chimps kill one another from different tribes. They form societies that involve a monetary system involving food, grooming and sex and have an understanding of injustice and inequality. They don't have religion. So while we can't say chimps obey all your biblical laws they obviously act in a way to benefit their group as a whole, instead of murdering, raping, pillaging from every single other monkey around them. So, that's another against that argument.
Next up, let's look at humans, since that's the whole concept after all: What came first, religion or the tribe? It would have to be the tribe. If you have a religion of one, it will never last very long. Okay, then what's the point of a tribe? They act in a way to support the whole. Hunting, foraging, beer brewing, what have you, that comes from the need to survive. Imagine if Cain and Abel were not with farm or animal, they were forced to forage, to hunt. They are two, two people able to hunt, to gather. Why do they both live? Because they act in interest of the whole. If you kill one, the other is much less likely to survive. The same thing extends to a full tribe. Farmers, hunters, foragers, more people to support, but more that can work, more that can hunt, and farm, and gather, enough that you can dedicate people to do things other than hunt, and farm, and gather, such as cooking, crafting, early medicine. Religion doesn't have to tell you all of that.