It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
GameRager: By "lewd" I meant anything uncensored.....we had Duke Nukem 3D/etc with such when the site started, but lately they have been dialing it back(with the exception of VNs, albeit also a bit censored in some cases).
I don't see this. Duke was removed due to license reasons. And if censorship is an argument - even the old Interplay versions of Fallout were censored (missing the children).

avatar
GameRager: Also do they really require age verification yet don't approve ANY such methods that sites use? If so then what's the point? Banning some games through stupid catch-22 laws I assume?
The point is that the left hand isn't knowing what the right hand is doing. For stuff like pr0n (or indexed games) a working age verification system is legally required, but none of the existing passed the test (the requirements are absurd), because it was in some way possible to bypass. That doesn't revoke the legal requirement though. Germany is weird in this regard, Kafka would be proud.

avatar
GameRager: I don't have solid proof onhand, but from what ive seen and know: Most of those games dropped years back before the staff started the "boutique storefront" stuff and the team was hired to accept/reject games, and while hatred might be boring/made for controversy some might want it regardless & they should be allowed to buy it. Also isn't Postal 2 a bit controversial and edgy for the sake of being edgy?
The boutique approach started when they stopped being "Good Old Games", to not end up like that Steam-dump. Keep in mind that GOG not only sells these games, they also offer (pretty good) support for them. From all I heard support on Steam is notoriously bad when a game makes trouble. They simply don't (and can't with those masses) care.
Postal 2 is IMO a brilliant satire/parody of the "American Dream" or "American Way of Life". The first part might have been a bit "for controversial's sake" (with solid gameplay though), but it's a cult-classic nowadays, which Hatred is simply not and never will be. I would probably buy it out of curiosity, but I don't feel GOG has to sell this game or "censorship!!".
low rated
avatar
dgnfly: Seeing how single-minded people here are you'd get little support from them seeing people being more selfish and making excuses why certain games shouldn't be here instead of just saying I'll support what you want to play cause having Choice is better than having none at all. The whole complaining about VN is just another SJW crying point cause it's not even X-rated but people still wanna control the narrative cause they wanna enforce their will on others and have a superiority complex when it comes to which games should or shouldn't be allowed.
Some are very open minded and want to allow such, though, so not everyone is like that here. Also(again) it's not just S*Ws doing such.....but some of your points about people complaining about games they dislike is valid.

avatar
dgnfly: Wizardy being a ''Niche'' title seems to some a big enough excuse to not release the title and people who cry that are those who don't care about another person's choice anyway.
Perhaps

avatar
dgnfly: Don't think people will be your allie simply cause you rtalk nice or logical some people run on irrasional behavoir and will simply go with the masses cause they can't think on their own.
I still try to set a good example, regardless, like others stick to their guns even if it only brings them some inner comfort and peace of mind and not much else in some cases.

(Also sigh the trolls hit the thread here as well....but will staff punish them? Nope, because apparently it's ok for others to abuse our reps every single day here)
low rated
avatar
toxicTom: I don't see this. Duke was removed due to license reasons. And if censorship is an argument - even the old Interplay versions of Fallout were censored (missing the children).
That is fine if you want to believe such, but if you cannot or choose not to see how the site has changed as to games accepted(more VNs and indies, and less lewd/un pc games) then I don't know what I can say that might convince you short of actual physical evidence.

Fact is, many games have been rejected over the years since around 4 or so years ago(give or take a bit of time) & that usually includes anything lewd/filled with un-pc elements or made by controversial(their held beliefs) devs......and more VNs/simulators/indie titles have been accepted in their place, and I don't believe the "niche" excuse fits every single rejected game or is the real reason behind such. Something stinks, for lack of a better phrase....there's too many "coincidences" and things not adding up in the official narrative.

avatar
toxicTom: The point is that the left hand isn't knowing what the right hand is doing. For stuff like pr0n (or indexed games) a working age verification system is legally required, but none of the existing passed the test (the requirements are absurd), because it was in some way possible to bypass. That doesn't revoke the legal requirement though. Germany is weird in this regard, Kafka would be proud.
If the legal requirement cannot be met they should change said requirements or they have basically put into effect a de facto ban on certain materials that cannot be lifted due to said requirements.

avatar
toxicTom: The boutique approach started when they stopped being "Good Old Games", to not end up like that Steam-dump. Keep in mind that GOG not only sells these games, they also offer (pretty good) support for them. From all I heard support on Steam is notoriously bad when a game makes trouble. They simply don't (and can't with those masses) care.
Yet they made Galaxy 1 and now 2 to emulate that "dump". They should choose a side....either try to be like steam or be unique from steam.

Tbh I wouldn't mind more games here...not as many as steam but also not as many rejections either.....it would also mean more money for Gog. I am guessing they could handle a few extra games added to the catalog.

avatar
toxicTom: Postal 2 is IMO a brilliant satire/parody of the "American Dream" or "American Way of Life". The first part might have been a bit "for controversial's sake" (with solid gameplay though), but it's a cult-classic nowadays, which Hatred is simply not and never will be. I would probably buy it out of curiosity, but I don't feel GOG has to sell this game or "censorship!!".
It is still a game that tried to be edgy to sell units, same as hatred in some ways....it is just more liked by some. Also it was added before curations came about, whereas hatred was rejected AFTER. Yeah, that's anecdotal, but still......

As for whether it can be a classic, eh it depends on tastes....some things I dislike are classics or cult classics, and some things I like or not.....I still think the store should sell them and let the market/people decide.

And yes, it isn't full blown censorship, but it is denying people a product likely based on the whims of the curation team's likes and dislikes.....to me that is in a way at least soft pseudo censorship(for the DRM free people who will only buy on Gog/etc, at least).
Post edited November 05, 2019 by GameRager
low rated
avatar
Green_Hilltop: Elminage Gothic is available on GOG though, and ORIGINAL isn't even out yet.
I don't understand your sentence. Both Elminage GOTHIC and Elminage ORIGINAL are available on Steam. Only Elminage GOTHIC is on GOG. I doubt we will see Elminage ORIGINAL on GOG.

avatar
Green_Hilltop: They're both by different companies though (the PC ports), and I don't think I've heard of Infinited Adventures?
Please excuse me, I've misspelled the name of the game. The correct name is "Infinite Adventures®" by Stormseeker Games: https://store.steampowered.com/app/607820/Infinite_Adventures/

avatar
Green_Hilltop: I recommend checking out The Quest by Redshift if you don't have it yet!
Thank you for this recommendation! I will have a look at this game.
low rated
avatar
GameRager: Fact is, many games have been rejected over the years since around 4 or so years ago(give or take a bit of time) & that usually includes anything lewd/filled with un-pc elements or made by controversial(their held beliefs) devs
It's not "fact". I fail to see any proof for that. There's only three games that are mentioned all over:
Hatred - by all who played it, simply not a good game
Agony - the first version a buggy mess and a bad game, the Unrated version probably hard to sell (borders on pr0n)
Grimoire - probably a fine game, but a notoriously difficult developer who lashes out at people (including business partners) on Twitter...

I wouldn't mind seeing those here, but GOG had reasons for not selling them, and I don't think "censorship" was one of them. They also rejected lot of other games which weren't controversial in any way.

avatar
GameRager: Yet they made Galaxy 1 and now 2 to emulate that "dump". They should choose a side....either try to be like steam or be unique from steam.
They made Galaxy to provide less tech-savvy people with a more convenient way to install and update games. Esp. the Witcher 3 which came out and brought a lot of new customers who were used to this convenience from Steam. Those people would simply be overwhelmed by tracking, downloading and installing patches manually after release. They would never have come back to GOG again.

In their core - the catalogue - GOG is unique from Steam

avatar
GameRager: Tbh I wouldn't mind more games here...not as many as steam but also not as many rejections either.....it would also mean more money for Gog. I am guessing they could handle a few extra games added to the catalog.
Everybody wants more games here, not just ANY games (like Steam). For every game they choose to sell or reject it's a simple business decision for GOG. Sometimes they made bad decisions (both ways). And the standard-rejection "too niche" is, as we all know, in many cases just the polite version of "your game sucks and it'll sell here like soaked used underwear", or "your game is a buggy mess and we won't handle your support for you".

All this crying about censorship sounds to me pretty unfounded. Hell, CDPR got a lot of flak from the eternally offended for The Witcher (sexist, racist, homophobic...).
low rated
avatar
RWarehall: Why are you people still going on about a game that hasn't been released yet?
Because I want to buy this game (and other blobbers) on GOG, and NOT on Steam. I want to avoid Steam as much as possible. The only alternative to Steam is ... GOG! That whole curation thing is intransparent and annoys me. In the end, GOG doesn't get my money. Or was GOG converted to a welfare centre with no obligation to earn money? I don't know. Tell me.
avatar
RWarehall: Why are you people still going on about a game that hasn't been released yet?
avatar
Jan.Teubel: Because I want to buy this game (and other blobbers) on GOG, and NOT on Steam. I want to avoid Steam as much as possible. The only alternative to Steam is ... GOG! That whole curation thing is intransparent and annoys me. In the end, GOG doesn't get my money. Or was GOG converted to a welfare centre with no obligation to earn money? I don't know. Tell me.
Said game *has not been released yet*.
low rated
Why all the "downvotes"? Some bitter member using a script?
low rated
avatar
GameRager: Fair enough, but you don't get people on your side and to listen if you disrespect others while saying such.

It used to be more applicable but now it isn't anymore, but let people have their hope if they want....it harms no one majorly for them to have such.
avatar
dgnfly: Seeing how single-minded people here are you'd get little support from them seeing people being more selfish and making excuses why certain games shouldn't be here instead of just saying I'll support what you want to play cause having Choice is better than having none at all. The whole complaining about VN is just another SJW crying point cause it's not even X-rated but people still wanna control the narrative cause they wanna enforce their will on others and have a superiority complex when it comes to which games should or shouldn't be allowed.

Wizardy being a ''Niche'' title seems to some a big enough excuse to not release the title and people who cry that are those who don't care about another person's choice anyway.

Don't think people will be your allie simply cause you rtalk nice or logical some people run on irrasional behavoir and will simply go with the masses cause they can't think on their own.
it would be kinda hilarious if a game being niche was grounds to rejection, considering that following this train of thought a whole lot of older titles they sell could be considered as a niche market to which they cater to regardless.
avatar
toxicTom: "Lewd" can't be the problem here. We have HuniePop, LSL:MCM and some VN with rather raunchy content. Not to mention the Witcher games by GOG's sister company CDPR. Explicit "pr0n" is not possible I guess (that's why the VN games are censored) because that would lead to legal trouble. For instance for Germany they would have to add an age verification. While I would actually applaud this (because they could unblock some games for "verified age" Germans this way), the trouble is - there is no age verification system on the market that is actually accepted by German authorities... Kafka is quietly laughing...
avatar
GameRager: By "lewd" I meant anything uncensored.....we had Duke Nukem 3D/etc with such when the site started, but lately they have been dialing it back(with the exception of VNs, albeit also a bit censored in some cases).

Also do they really require age verification yet don't approve ANY such methods that sites use? If so then what's the point? Banning some games through stupid catch-22 laws I assume?

avatar
toxicTom: About Un-PC... citation needed. It's wasn't GOG's choice for instance that Duke Nukem had to leave here, and I'm sure they'd gladly sell DN4ever too. Shadow Warrior, LSL, Postal are not "PC". AFAIK Hatred is just a boring game for the sake of controversy, Agony also has very mixed reviews and was said to be extremely buggy on release.
avatar
GameRager: I don't have solid proof onhand, but from what ive seen and know: Most of those games dropped years back before the staff started the "boutique storefront" stuff and the team was hired to accept/reject games, and while hatred might be boring/made for controversy some might want it regardless & they should be allowed to buy it. Also isn't Postal 2 a bit controversial and edgy for the sake of being edgy?
Postal 2 is really being its own thing, its one of those games that isnt meant to be taken seriously and its also holding a mirror in front of society as a whole pointing out and making fun of a lot of hypocritical stuff people do ie people who protest against violent video games start to storm down the ingame RWS office building armed to the teeth and so on and so forth.

Its really less about being edgy á la Hatred and more of making the game over-the-top nonsensical.
avatar
RWarehall: Why are you people still going on about a game that hasn't been released yet?
avatar
Jan.Teubel: Because I want to buy this game (and other blobbers) on GOG, and NOT on Steam. I want to avoid Steam as much as possible. The only alternative to Steam is ... GOG! That whole curation thing is intransparent and annoys me. In the end, GOG doesn't get my money. Or was GOG converted to a welfare centre with no obligation to earn money? I don't know. Tell me.
then convince gog to approve this game to be sold here
Post edited November 05, 2019 by Zetikla
low rated
avatar
dgnfly: Seeing how single-minded people here are you'd get little support from them seeing people being more selfish and making excuses why certain games shouldn't be here instead of just saying I'll support what you want to play cause having Choice is better than having none at all. The whole complaining about VN is just another SJW crying point cause it's not even X-rated but people still wanna control the narrative cause they wanna enforce their will on others and have a superiority complex when it comes to which games should or shouldn't be allowed.

Wizardy being a ''Niche'' title seems to some a big enough excuse to not release the title and people who cry that are those who don't care about another person's choice anyway.

Don't think people will be your allie simply cause you rtalk nice or logical some people run on irrasional behavoir and will simply go with the masses cause they can't think on their own.
avatar
Zetikla: it would be kinda hilarious if a game being niche was grounds to rejection, considering that following this train of thought a whole lot of older titles they sell could be considered as a niche market to which they cater to regardless.
avatar
GameRager: By "lewd" I meant anything uncensored.....we had Duke Nukem 3D/etc with such when the site started, but lately they have been dialing it back(with the exception of VNs, albeit also a bit censored in some cases).

Also do they really require age verification yet don't approve ANY such methods that sites use? If so then what's the point? Banning some games through stupid catch-22 laws I assume?

I don't have solid proof onhand, but from what ive seen and know: Most of those games dropped years back before the staff started the "boutique storefront" stuff and the team was hired to accept/reject games, and while hatred might be boring/made for controversy some might want it regardless & they should be allowed to buy it. Also isn't Postal 2 a bit controversial and edgy for the sake of being edgy?
avatar
Zetikla: Postal 2 is really being its own thing, its one of those games that isnt meant to be taken seriously and its also holding a mirror in front of society as a whole pointing out and making fun of a lot of hypocritical stuff people do ie people who protest against violent video games start to storm down the ingame RWS office building armed to the teeth and so on and so forth.

Its really less about being edgy á la Hatred and more of making the game over-the-top nonsensical.
avatar
Jan.Teubel: Because I want to buy this game (and other blobbers) on GOG, and NOT on Steam. I want to avoid Steam as much as possible. The only alternative to Steam is ... GOG! That whole curation thing is intransparent and annoys me. In the end, GOG doesn't get my money. Or was GOG converted to a welfare centre with no obligation to earn money? I don't know. Tell me.
avatar
Zetikla: then convince gog to approve this game to be sold here
In case you didn't know the game was rejected on the grounds of being ''Too Niche'' this is a common excuse GOG uses to reject games. even if the wishlist count is high they would still release lower rated Indie games before hardcore dungeon crawler RPG.
low rated
avatar
Zetikla: it would be kinda hilarious if a game being niche was grounds to rejection, considering that following this train of thought a whole lot of older titles they sell could be considered as a niche market to which they cater to regardless.

Postal 2 is really being its own thing, its one of those games that isnt meant to be taken seriously and its also holding a mirror in front of society as a whole pointing out and making fun of a lot of hypocritical stuff people do ie people who protest against violent video games start to storm down the ingame RWS office building armed to the teeth and so on and so forth.

Its really less about being edgy á la Hatred and more of making the game over-the-top nonsensical.

then convince gog to approve this game to be sold here
avatar
dgnfly: In case you didn't know the game was rejected on the grounds of being ''Too Niche'' this is a common excuse GOG uses to reject games. even if the wishlist count is high they would still release lower rated Indie games before hardcore dungeon crawler RPG.
Wow, just...wow

whatever kool-aid they were drinking when deciding this, it must have been some strong stuff.


i wonder if its because of the anime graphic style
Post edited November 05, 2019 by Zetikla
low rated
avatar
dgnfly: In case you didn't know the game was rejected on the grounds of being ''Too Niche'' this is a common excuse GOG uses to reject games. even if the wishlist count is high they would still release lower rated Indie games before hardcore dungeon crawler RPG.
avatar
Zetikla: Wow, just...wow

whatever kool-aid they were drinking when deciding this, it must have been some strong stuff.

i wonder if its because of the anime graphic style
some are just very Japanese related so that kinda gives the impression what Cleve Blakemore suggests. just look up why he suggested his game was rejected by GOG it does seem to hold some truth when you see the games they rejected.

We can't be sure, but it seems more of an explanation than what GOG is giving us. They say they are ''curated store'' and don't want trash games while some here never get updated or are constantly missing content.
low rated
avatar
Zetikla: Wow, just...wow

whatever kool-aid they were drinking when deciding this, it must have been some strong stuff.

i wonder if its because of the anime graphic style
avatar
dgnfly: some are just very Japanese related so that kinda gives the impression what Cleve Blakemore suggests. just look up why he suggested his game was rejected by GOG it does seem to hold some truth when you see the games they rejected.

We can't be sure, but it seems more of an explanation than what GOG is giving us. They say they are ''curated store'' and don't want trash games while some here never get updated or are constantly missing content.
yep, so much about curated content and all that sweet PR talk of theirs

its so ironic
low rated
avatar
toxicTom: It's not "fact". I fail to see any proof for that. There's only three games that are mentioned all over:
Hatred - by all who played it, simply not a good game
Agony - the first version a buggy mess and a bad game, the Unrated version probably hard to sell (borders on pr0n)
Grimoire - probably a fine game, but a notoriously difficult developer who lashes out at people (including business partners) on Twitter...
My mistake, I worded it a bad wrong. It should say "Fact is, some decent games have been rejected...."

Also there are a good number who like hatred, Agony(don't know much about it) could be fixed and there are also likely some who like it/it could be sold censored like Huniepop. As for Grimoire....who cares if the dev is a bit hard to work with? It's still a source of income for Gog, and rejecting it is like them saying they don't like money to some degree.

Big note: There are many more rejected games...there is even a THREAD that is several pages long DEDICATED to all the games Gog has turned down and the blanket replies given over the years.....it is usually near page 2 or 3 most times.

avatar
toxicTom: I wouldn't mind seeing those here, but GOG had reasons for not selling them, and I don't think "censorship" was one of them. They also rejected lot of other games which weren't controversial in any way.
And I don't think the niche excuse flies either, fwiw. As for other rejections: They CAN reject for more than just that reason, you know.


avatar
toxicTom: They made Galaxy to provide less tech-savvy people with a more convenient way to install and update games. Esp. the Witcher 3 which came out and brought a lot of new customers who were used to this convenience from Steam. Those people would simply be overwhelmed by tracking, downloading and installing patches manually after release. They would never have come back to GOG again.

In their core - the catalogue - GOG is unique from Steam
And emulating steam to make sales is emulating steam to make sales and keep some customers.....so they still copied facets of that store to sell units.

I will give you the fact that Gog differs from steam in several ways, though...the site, that is, not galaxy(which is very similar to steam's client) for the most part.


avatar
toxicTom: Everybody wants more games here, not just ANY games (like Steam). For every game they choose to sell or reject it's a simple business decision for GOG. Sometimes they made bad decisions (both ways). And the standard-rejection "too niche" is, as we all know, in many cases just the polite version of "your game sucks and it'll sell here like soaked used underwear", or "your game is a buggy mess and we won't handle your support for you".
I think many more games should come here, and that the curation stuff harms business due to lost profit more than it helps, as those that want such have to go elsewhere.

Also c'mon....they have some games here that sell very few copies and their devs are allowed to release more games here, yet games like the one in the Op(but not that one specifically, per se) are rejected that many express an interest in buying. It's like Gog wants to lose money by doing so.

avatar
toxicTom: All this crying about censorship sounds to me pretty unfounded. Hell, CDPR got a lot of flak from the eternally offended for The Witcher (sexist, racist, homophobic...).
CDPR and Gog are run independently from one another...they don't answer to each other and have different goals(or so an insider told someone who told me...make of it what you will).

And yes, it might be unfounded, but i've seen too many things supporting that idea over the months since I returned and even in the recent past...as I said it just doesn't add up(the official story) and the censorship(as a partial reason for rejections) seems more plausible when you factor such in.

Could I be wrong? Possibly. What I DO know, though, is that Gog rejecting so many games to make itself unique from steam is losing them potential sales while they add more games that sell to only a "niche" market.

=============================

avatar
tfishell: Why all the "downvotes"? Some bitter member using a script?
Quite likely, or someone doing it manually. Me and many replies to me have been getting hit lately with downvotes in mass waves every day.

============================

avatar
Zetikla: Postal 2 is really being its own thing, its one of those games that isnt meant to be taken seriously and its also holding a mirror in front of society as a whole pointing out and making fun of a lot of hypocritical stuff people do ie people who protest against violent video games start to storm down the ingame RWS office building armed to the teeth and so on and so forth.

Its really less about being edgy á la Hatred and more of making the game over-the-top nonsensical.
To me it is still being edgy albeit a different kind of edge, and to sell copies...just like Hatred. To sell one and not the other stinks to high heaven & I don't trust the too niche excuse for a minute.

========================

avatar
Zetikla: Wow, just...wow

whatever kool-aid they were drinking when deciding this, it must have been some strong stuff.

i wonder if its because of the anime graphic style
He might be partially right.....look at the games released like cooking/burgler sims, pc building sims, Indie niche titles(the very niche ones I mean), and look at the games rejected.....classical RPGs/edgy games/games with too much lewd content/etc.
Post edited November 06, 2019 by GameRager
avatar
dgnfly: In case you didn't know the game was rejected on the grounds of being ''Too Niche'' this is a common excuse GOG uses to reject games. even if the wishlist count is high they would still release lower rated Indie games before hardcore dungeon crawler RPG.
Nowhere did XSEED say this game was rejected for being "too niche", but you keep spreading this misinformation about any number of games. The only thing said was "Wizardry did not meet store requirements". That's it. Instead you keep spreading this false narrative for any game which isn't here.

Later we discovered there were licensing issues and instead of being released May 29, 2019, it is now scheduled for January 2020.

We don't have any idea why it was rejected, but being a console port, maybe GoG wasn't fond of the wrapper/emulator they planned to use. They may have had issues with the title. For all we know contract requirements with the existing Wizardry games on GoG prevent another title from appearing here. Maybe GoG was aware of the game from the PS3 and felt it was not good enough to be here. It really wasn't rated for well when it came out on the PS3 either. Maybe they had a review copy and thought the emulation sucked.

But quit spreading this ridiculousness about everything being "too niche". The fact is the vast majority of rejections are pretty obvious. Grimoire has horrible user reviews and user review score on top of the creator being a drama queen who attacks his customers. Any number of other games have been given away in bundles for under $1 within a month of release which that developer does regularly. Others, no one ever heard of until they were rejected. Others are far overpriced for their lack of popularity/quality.

And the one thing you and so many others forget...it costs money to bring a new product here. It costs money to review and troubleshoot. It takes time and money to update wrappers and installers to keep up to date with OS changes. A game must sell enough copies to make a profit. If it doesn't, it would be foolish to bring the game here.