It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

What the hell is up with the downvotes? This isn't a political thread, is it? I'm concerned, especially since my last post was essentially "here's some facts about Humble" and nothing more, yet it was downvoted. Also, even if you disagree with him, I have a hard time buying that RWarehall is leading these mass downvotes? This sounds more the doing of some faceless, no-name troll than anything.
low rated
avatar
RWarehall: You don't see the forest through the trees. Puzzle games from Zachtronics ARE outselling old-school turn-based RPGs like Grimoire, Fall of the Dungeon Guardians and all the other "niche" titles you keep touting as bestsellers.

Proof is in the pudding with data from the largest online video game retailer in the world.
Prove it then.....show Gog sales estimates of best zachtronics games vs. Grimoire within the same period or proof of such.

avatar
RWarehall: You have literally stated you want every game here except asset flips...that's pretty much every game.
You know what kind of "asset flip games" I meant(the ones steam gets flooded with that many here complain the most about).

avatar
RWarehall: I've also gone into the costs GoG incurs to bring titles here and have explained in detail why GoG loses money on poorly selling titles.
Costs mean little if a game sells well and the devs do some of the work(as they should). Also this game has a much higher potential user base to pull from then some such puzzle games and others, so there is/would be more chance of profit.

avatar
RWarehall: You keep acting as if you know better than GoG about their own business and what it takes to make money.
I never said I did...I just have common sense and can read trends and know what people seem to want more of.

Also you should talk...you seem to think Gog can do no wrong on such matters and it's wrong of people to criticize such. Gog is a big boy/girl....let it defend itself if need be.

avatar
RWarehall: It's painfully obvious that you don't.
One could say the same for the times you've been wrong....I still await you to admit you were wrong on Grimoire(sales potential/etc).

(Also please answer the questions from my prior post if you could, instead of essentially saying "you're wrong and i; right: the post" each time)
Post edited January 05, 2020 by GameRager
avatar
Chacranajxy: Humble has some DRM-free stuff. This game is one of those titles. You need an account to buy stuff, obviously, but after you buy it, you just download the installer and can do whatever you want with it.
As far as I understand, you do not need an account to buy stuff from Humble. When you make a purchase, you get emailed a link to a page with all the game details- keys to redeem if the game is not DRM free, or game downloads if it is DRM free (along with any music or other extras).

If you have an account, or make one later, you can CLAIM THIS PAGE to your account, but if you don't, you have to be careful not to lose the email with the link.

So if Wizardry: Labyrinth of Lost Souls does not come to gog, and the publishers are ok with it being DRM free, people should have no issue.

90° turn dungeon crawlers are nowhere near my favourite genre (I like the Grimrock games, but that's about it), even back when they weren't a nostalgia gimmick , so being neither the target audience for it, nor knowledgeable about it in in the least, I'm not specifically speaking of this game and its like, or the quality of this title, but since it has been brought up in this thread...

I'm very happy that gog's curation policy is not "If the game works as a game and isn't an asset flip, let it in".

I'm very happy that gog personally investigates each game (through whatever methodology) and decides whether it should be on the store, rather than charging an up-front $100 and letting in whatever shovelware anyone wants to make- could their methodology be improved? Probably, everything can be improved. Should the curation be removed? Absolutely not.

I'm sad for the legitimate fans of this game if they cannot buy it from here, but happy for them that they have the option to get it DRM-free from the Humble store. I wish the ghouls who have no interest in the game, but latch on to it to push forward their weird agenda against gog would "leave their politics out of gaming" (as they like to say so often).
Post edited January 05, 2020 by babark
low rated
avatar
PookaMustard: Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

What the hell is up with the downvotes? This isn't a political thread, is it? I'm concerned, especially since my last post was essentially "here's some facts about Humble" and nothing more, yet it was downvoted. Also, even if you disagree with him, I have a hard time buying that RWarehall is leading these mass downvotes? This sounds more the doing of some faceless, no-name troll than anything.
Fronzel's razor applies: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by mental illness.

This is the gog forum, after all...
low rated
avatar
babark: I'm very happy that gog's curation policy is not "If the game works as a game and isn't an asset flip, let it in".
If I may ask.....why does it matter what comes here as long a you can buy what you want and others can buy what they want? :)

avatar
babark: I'm very happy that gog personally investigates each game (through whatever methodology) and decides whether it should be on the store, rather than charging an up-front $100 and letting in whatever shovelware anyone wants to make- could their methodology be improved? Probably, everything can be improved. Should the curation be removed? Absolutely not.
I dunno about others, but I don't want it removed......I just want a clear set of guidelines for acceptance/rejection(i.e. not basing it on personal tastes of the team & what they think will be popular, and more selling games that figures and other models show will sell and be easy for Gog to package/sell/promote), and more games(but not all or even most) to be let on.

avatar
babark: I'm sad for the legitimate fans of this game if they cannot buy it from here, but happy for them that they have the option to get it DRM-free from the Humble store. I wish the ghouls who have no interest in the game, but latch on to it to push forward their weird agenda against gog would "leave their politics out of gaming" (as they like to say so often).
By calling those who have legitimate(or possibly legitimate) complaints and criticism of Gog curation you are also bringing politics of Gog into it to some degree.

They/we are not all ghouls & most of us want the game...if not for ourselves than because of others who might want it and to help Gog continue to grow. :)
==================================================
All the above said, you state your words well and are very civil about it for the most part, and you seem to want others to have access to some games and respect others rights to haves access to games they like.....+1 for all that.
Post edited January 05, 2020 by GameRager
low rated
avatar
RWarehall: You don't see the forest through the trees. Puzzle games from Zachtronics ARE outselling old-school turn-based RPGs like Grimoire, Fall of the Dungeon Guardians and all the other "niche" titles you keep touting as bestsellers.

Proof is in the pudding with data from the largest online video game retailer in the world.
Grimoire is out-selling Molek-Syntez here on this store, no? Btw, this is taking into account that (as you love to point out) Grimoire has been out for many years, also many people hate the developer (both points the opposite for Molek-Syntez). In addition, for months Grimoire had a version sold for the same price DRM-free on a non-Scheme store (itch). It stands to reason that Grimoire sales on GOG would be even bigger without these factors working against it.

Look, sales and reviews on the Scheme monopoly store are a form of data. That is not in argument. The argument is how to value different types of data, including and not limited to that Scheme sales/review data. Your approach seems to be to give it maximum weight, for reasons that still make no sense. What really baffles me though is now you seem to still favor the Scheme data, even once there is actual GOG data to look at instead!

avatar
RWarehall: You keep acting as if you know better than GoG about their own business and what it takes to make money. It's painfully obvious that you don't.
Look in the mirror...you were campaigning so hard against Grimoire being on this store and still won't admit you were wrong. For what it's worth though, my own position is different from GameRager in that I don't want all games here. And like he said t's not a zero sum game where GOG has to accept all or none.

You keep acting as though you hate dungeon-crawler RPGs. There is a proven audience here on this site for them. There may at this point be a proven audience on this site for puzzle games too. What's annoying is the form-letter style rejection of "too niche" when a dungeon crawler RPG is at least the same level of niche as a puzzle game.

In other words, the data for this store (you know, the relevant one, the one we're on) would seem to indicate GOG should accept both niche dungeon crawlers and niche puzzle games, since on this site, those games are not a "niche" in terms of sales.
After reading this thread I tried to get an idea of certain things mentioned here:

Steam sales according to Steamspy:
SpaceChem 1,000,000 - 2,000,000 Owners
Opus Magnum 200,000 - 500,000 Owners
SHENZHEN I/O 200,000 - 500,000 Owners
Infinifactory 200,000 - 500,000 Owners
TIS-100 200,000 - 500,000 Owners
Ironclad Tactics 50,000 - 100,000 Owners
EXAPUNKS 20,000 - 50,000 Owners
Eliza 0 - 20,000 Owners
MOLEK-SYNTEZ 0 - 20,000 Owners

Grimoire 0 - 20,000 Owners

GOG bestselling games without DLCs, demos, unreleased games and free games:

SpaceChem Nr. 412
TIS-100 Nr. 745
SHENZHEN I/O Nr. 991
Infinifactory Nr. 1258
Opus Magnum Nr. 1337
Ironclad Tactics Nr. 1369
EXAPUNKS Nr. 1820
Eliza Nr. 2166
MOLEK-SYNTEZ Nr. 2313

Grimoire Nr. 1885

Whatever the GOG ranking means the pattern looks similar to Steam. The most successful Zachtronics game is SpaceChem. It is followed by the group consisting of Opus Magnum, SHENZHEN I/O, Infinifactory, TIS-100, Ironclad Tactics. I am surprised by the success of TIS-100. "It's the assembly language programming game you never asked for!" (quoting Zachtronics here) I'd argue that this game is even more hardcore than MOLEK-SYNTEZ. The bottom three games are EXAPUNKS, Eliza and MOLEK-SYNTEZ. And the mentioned Grimoire seems to be as successful as this group on both platforms.

But what has this to do with Wizardry: Labyrinth of Lost Souls? It is released after having licensing issues this year. And GOG hasn't said anything to this new situation. And I think some news about Wizardry 1-5 would be interesting.
Post edited January 05, 2020 by toma85
avatar
toma85: Whatever the GOG ranking means the pattern looks similar to Steam. The most successful Zachtronics game is SpaceChem. It is followed by the group consisting of Opus Magnum, SHENZHEN I/O, Infinifactory, TIS-100, Ironclad Tactics. I am surprised by the success of TIS-100. "It's the assembly language programming game you never asked for!" (quoting Zachtronics here) I'd argue that this game is even more hardcore than MOLEK-SYNTEZ. The bottom three games are EXAPUNKS, Eliza and MOLEK-SYNTEZ. And the mentioned Grimoire seems to be as successful as this group on both platforms.

But what has this to do with Wizardry: Labyrinth of Lost Souls? It is released after having licensing issues this year. And GOG hasn't said anything to this new situation. And I think some news about Wizardry 1-5 would be interesting.
I'm not sure it is reasonable to group Grimoire with those other 3 games. It came out over 2 years ago (on Steam) and MOLEK-SYNTEZ came out 2 months ago. On gog they're more comparable, but you'd still want to wait a while to get more comparable data.

But yeah, dunno what that has to do with this Wizardry game, which has, by basic appearances, far better production quality.
avatar
toma85: But what has this to do with Wizardry: Labyrinth of Lost Souls? It is released after having licensing issues this year. And GOG hasn't said anything to this new situation. And I think some news about Wizardry 1-5 would be interesting.
I'd say you nailed it exactly...

We have the same handful of people complaining about GoG curation. If anyone has played this port, it's GoG. Why was it rejected? Was it rejected because it plays poorly and is just a glorified iOS port? Was it just licensing? It's not like this was a great game on the PS3.

The iOS Metacritic average is 62/100.
PS3 57/100.
GamePro 3.5/5 stars
GamesRadar+ 3/5 stars
and 5 other publications rated it from 4/10 to 7.5/10

And anyone who has ever looked at gaming review magazines, even uninspiring games seem to get 8 out of 10.

Maybe it got better...but I trust GoG who may have actually tested it, to tell me whether this game is an awful port over people who seem to like everything no matter how bad the reviews who HAVE NEVER PLAYED THE REMASTER.

I want GoG to bring it here...IF IT IS GOOD...
And to reject it if its a bad mobile port with HD graphics tacked on top or if it still plays like and uninspired console game.
We'll see what happens when it gets released.

This isn't some new game. It's a game from 2009 that wasn't all that good at the time.
avatar
CMOT70: Speaking of whom, where is he? Banned, presumed gone?
The only thing that i know about him that he changed his username .
low rated
avatar
toma85: MOLEK-SYNTEZ Nr. 2313

Grimoire Nr. 1885
So Gromoire is at 1885 and has been out a bit less time here than Molek-Syntez...plus we all know that better numbers ramp up copies sold at a semi-exponential increase as numbers decrease, meaning Grimoire likely did a good amount better than the other game in the sameish period of time.....yet Grimoire got rejected initially and Molek-Syntez did not.

avatar
toma85: But what has this to do with Wizardry: Labyrinth of Lost Souls? It is released after having licensing issues this year. And GOG hasn't said anything to this new situation.
It was more to showcase how games have been rejected that(when they are dropped here) seem to generally sell more than many new games added without rejections.

And also bearing in mind that the games usually rejected are in genres that more potential players like, which could potentially(and have shown to) sell more copies than other games with smaller potential fanbases/player bases.

avatar
toma85: And I think some news about Wizardry 1-5 would be interesting.
Agreed. Also thanks for all the numbers/data above.

=====================================

avatar
rjbuffchix: Your approach seems to be to give it maximum weight, for reasons that still make no sense. What really baffles me though is now you seem to still favor the Scheme data, even once there is actual GOG data to look at instead!
Because it doesn't support his argument, most likely.

avatar
rjbuffchix: For what it's worth though, my own position is different from GameRager in that I don't want all games here. And like he said t's not a zero sum game where GOG has to accept all or none.
Should there not be a "not that" in front of the word "different" above? I also have the same stance as you. :)

avatar
rjbuffchix: In other words, the data for this store (you know, the relevant one, the one we're on) would seem to indicate GOG should accept both niche dungeon crawlers and niche puzzle games, since on this site, those games are not a "niche" in terms of sales.
My bet: He might say it's a fluke or some such(the big sales for that one game, I mean)....but if he doesn't i'd be happy to be shown to be wrong. :)
=============================================

avatar
RWarehall: We have the same handful of people complaining about GoG curation.
More like complaining about it's mistakes here and there(at least in my case).

avatar
RWarehall: It's not like this was a great game on the PS3.

The iOS Metacritic average is 62/100.
PS3 57/100.
GamePro 3.5/5 stars
GamesRadar+ 3/5 stars
and 5 other publications rated it from 4/10 to 7.5/10
Who cares as long as it would sell well and make Gog money and allow people to buy it here and play it?

As I keep asking(and you keep ignoring): What is more important to Gog? Reviews and scores or profit from copies sold? Does Gog pay it's bills and staff with reviews now?

avatar
RWarehall: Maybe it got better...but I trust GoG who may have actually tested it, to tell me whether this game is an awful port over people who seem to like everything no matter how bad the reviews who HAVE NEVER PLAYED THE REMASTER.
Your trust in Gog(or seeming trust...could be a ruse) is not a wise move.....it's akin to anyone who trusts those "pro" reviews in mags and on some sites.

Also why not let people buy what they want to buy....it's not like Gog would force you to buy them(some games they rejected) if they let them come here.

avatar
RWarehall: I want GoG to bring it here...IF IT IS GOOD...
And to reject it if its a bad mobile port with HD graphics tacked on top or if it still plays like and uninspired console game.
That is a selfish view, I think....why does it matter if it's here if you don't have to buy it or play it? I don't like some games much but I still want people to be able to play them if they want.

avatar
RWarehall: This isn't some new game. It's a game from 2009 that wasn't all that good at the time.
Who cares if it's a game you or I consider good or is not our thing? They should be sold here if they will sell well, as Gog is a business not a high end shop for rich snobby people who turn their noses up at the "refuse" of "common folk".
Post edited January 06, 2020 by GameRager
avatar
GameRager: snip
You are comparing a game that went on sale to a release which never had a sale...
MOLEK-SYNTEZ is one of the 15% of titles that were NOT on sale during the Winter Sale and you are bragging about how great Grimoire supposedly did because it did better. When one was on sale and the other not.

As to Steam data...wake up!
Steam sales parallel GoG sales. I've provided plenty of data showing that. But instead we are supposed to believe you, who has no knowledge or experience or research, that this game or that game is mainstream and in-demand while you call Zachtronics games "niche". When all the data says Zachtronics games generally sell better than the games you propose.

Yes, it's about game sales. So tell me, how many people would buy a bad port of a mediocre game that plays as if it were developed for mobile? If the game sucks, people won't buy it. And since neither you nor I have tested this upcoming port/remaster, it makes sense to me to trust the judgment of those who have tried it out aka GoG curation. Just because something is an RPG doesn't mean it sells the same as every RPG. A ton of people will be buying BG3 and Cyberpunk 2077. Not so many will be buying that RPG clone that is a poor man's imitation of a classic from some little known programmer. The genre doesn't sell a game, it's quality does.

It doesn't help that the original game wasn't considered very good in its own time. You can put a new coat of paint on a 1995 Ford Escort, that doesn't make it sell like its a Corvette...
low rated
avatar
rjbuffchix: For what it's worth though, my own position is different from GameRager in that I don't want all games here. And like he said t's not a zero sum game where GOG has to accept all or none.
avatar
GameRager: Should there not be a "not that" in front of the word "different" above? I also have the same stance as you. :)
I am in favor of curation but think RPGs are particularly popular among GOG's audience, especially old-school minded users, so they should not be getting rejected unless we are talking RPG Maker asset flips. When you (not "you" personally) think about it, the love of RPGs on this store makes a lot of sense. Gamers who like dedicated single player experiences will often gravitate to RPGs, since they're usually designed that way and have a massive amount of content (thus a deeper experience compared to shorter games).

avatar
RWarehall: So tell me, how many people would buy a bad port of a mediocre game that plays as if it were developed for mobile? If the game sucks, people won't buy it. And since neither you nor I have tested this upcoming port/remaster, it makes sense to me to trust the judgment of those who have tried it out aka GoG curation.
GOG curation have already approved multiple mediocre-looking games with mobile design. That weakens trust and the problem is compounded when the consumer also sees desirable non-mobile-type games getting rejected by curation.

avatar
RWarehall: Just because something is an RPG doesn't mean it sells the same as every RPG. A ton of people will be buying BG3 and Cyberpunk 2077. Not so many will be buying that RPG clone that is a poor man's imitation of a classic from some little known programmer. The genre doesn't sell a game, it's quality does.
Isn't that stacking the deck quite a bit? Of course the biggest names in RPGs will sell more than lesser known ones. That said, your last sentence is incorrect. I know I personally am willing to buy RPGs without having played them, but not other genres.
low rated
avatar
RWarehall: You are comparing a game that went on sale to a release which never had a sale...

MOLEK-SYNTEZ is one of the 15% of titles that were NOT on sale during the Winter Sale and you are bragging about how great Grimoire supposedly did because it did better. When one was on sale and the other not.
What was the discount again? Around 20% or so it seems.....yet you try to act/frame it like it was on sale for a buck or two.

(Also Molek-Syntez was just an off the top of my head example, which is why I used it, though I could likely find better ones with effort.)

That said, the game has been here several weeks longer than Grimoire YET is behind Grimoire by several hundred places on the sales charts.....if you are trying to claim all or most of that is due to people saving 2-3 bucks on the game then fine, but I have a hard time believing that.

(I agree some of it is likely due to the sale, but not most or all...ALSO it is still selling seemingly decently even now AFTER the sale ended.)

avatar
RWarehall: As to Steam data...wake up!
Steam sales parallel GoG sales. I've provided plenty of data showing that. But instead we are supposed to believe you, who has no knowledge or experience or research, that this game or that game is mainstream and in-demand while you call Zachtronics games "niche".
They don't always....also I don't think people should just believe anyone without proof or research, whereas you throw out steam data and go "trust me on this".

Also yes, their games ARE n*che compared to big AAA titles in the big genres like RPGs/FPS/etc.

avatar
RWarehall: When all the data says Zachtronics games generally sell better than the games you propose.
SOME have sold better OVERALL, but some of them have been here much longer than Grimoire......I don't know if I will be proven right but I am willing to BET the numbers do decently well by the time the same amount of time(that those Zachtronics games have been here so far) has passed....and if not the game(Grimoire) has still sold many more copies then you seemed to have claimed it would, making GOG a nice tidy sum.

avatar
RWarehall: Yes, it's about game sales. So tell me, how many people would buy a bad port of a mediocre game that plays as if it were developed for mobile?
Your tastes and mine differ, but I would buy it on sale(not because of quality but due to being poorer than most)....though i'd still buy it as it looks good....and i'm near certain others would do the same(Both due to content/genre/series and also to have it DRM free on Gog for some people). Also some might buy it just to see if it's as bad as some like you claim it is....so even more sales.

avatar
RWarehall: If the game sucks, people won't buy it. And since neither you nor I have tested this upcoming port/remaster, it makes sense to me to trust the judgment of those who have tried it out aka GoG curation.
I don't put faith in them much anymore, but to be fair I don't trust many reviewers/curators.

avatar
RWarehall: Just because something is an RPG doesn't mean it sells the same as every RPG. A ton of people will be buying BG3 and Cyberpunk 2077. Not so many will be buying that RPG clone that is a poor man's imitation of a classic from some little known programmer.
This is your speculation and guesswork(the starting parts), and it IS canon and an official Wizardry game(afaik).

avatar
RWarehall: The genre doesn't sell a game, it's quality does.
And tastes are subjective and what one thinks may or may not happen might not always be the case(even I could be wrong on this, and I can at least admit that)

avatar
RWarehall: It doesn't help that the original game wasn't considered very good in its own time. You can put a new coat of paint on a 1995 Ford Escort, that doesn't make it sell like its a Corvette...
You dislike it but others might not.....why not let people play what they want and be the judge of what they like and want to buy(or not)? :)
low rated
avatar
GameRager: [...]
Also yeah...Gog apparently thinks stuff like this isn't appealing to a wide enough audience YET they seem to think that that Molek-Syntez game IS.
[...]
avatar
amok: as said before: context -
https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2018/02/01/opus-magnum-overcomes-rejection-to-launch-on-gog/
https://www.polygon.com/2018/1/6/16858740/opus-magnum-gog-rejected
https://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2018-01-08-confusion-surrounds-gogs-rejection-of-opus-magnum
https://www.pcgamer.com/uk/why-exquisite-puzzler-opus-magnum-was-barred-from-gog/

anyway - Zachtronics games are very, very good puzzles games that sell quite well and have a large fan base, so I am not sure why you use it as an example
I think the point is, Zachtronics games have a much more narrow fanbase than RPGs.