toxicTom: A free copy of Jack Keane?
If that were the prize, I'd expect the site to work flawlessly.
toxicTom: It's my suspicion that they published a "work in progress" site update. Rushed out, to somehow contain the spam problem. And now they're trying to fix the problems and bugs with this update.
If they meant to address the spam problem, it's clearly not working if the affected game fora are anything to go by.
And trying to fix? It feels more like they're trying to create additional problems. It'd appear that they just went back to an old data base,as people are getting old avatars, and all of them are inferior scaled down versions.
adaliabooks: It doesn't exactly make sense, but this is a GoG site update we're talking about.. so what would you expect?
I wonder if there's a bigger package of changes and they're just turning them on one at a time?
It would be nice if they told us what the hell was going on. The way Judas was talking in the avatar thread makes it sound likes it all some bug, but it's clearly not...
Yes, because assigning MS Metro style avatars to users that haven't chosen one for themselves is so bloody important.
I'm willing to bet that the new avatars - which btw are atrociously ugly - are introduced because of the Galaxy client, and them appearing on the forum is a side-effect, as in the forum gets them too because they're tied to our accounts. Things get screwed up on the forum? Who cares? It's not like it's drowning in spam for a full work-week now, let's just add another hiccup, the community is very tolerant, after all.
GOG leaves a lot to be desired both about the way they implement updates and the way they (don't) communicate changes.
What else is new?