Thanks, I will double check the statements you highlighted.
Edit: expanding the statements::
Claim: "Firefox will include an AI censorship system, which will decide for you what you will be shown."
Your claim: "none of the links you posted supports that statement"
Proof:
Source "Product ... Mozilla’s Open Innovation team will ...
develop technology that combats misinformation."
"Coral is a Mozilla project that builds open-source tools to make digital journalism more inclusive and more engaging" >>
"The Coral Project is ... the Mozilla Foundation, The New York Times, and The Washington Post, <span class="bold">funded by a grant from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.</span>" >> [url=http://Source]Source Source.
The "Technology" is an automated censoring mechanism, AI, which development is linked to funds from Soros.
Claim: "Some big news, unless you already know them."
Your claim: "throwing lots of buzzwords and empty PR phrase"
Proof: it is big enough that they dedicate whole clearly structured article, to outline their vector of actions, involving Mozilla Foundation and Soros funds. These are serious organizations. Per definition, it is not empty or buzz because software projects mentioned on that page are already developed.
Claim: "a whole lot of nothing for the normal user who simply uses firefox as a browser."
Proof: The automatic censorship is important enough to be mentioned. I am using firefox as a browser since around 2005.
Yes, please stay away from this thread, as such destructive and disrespectful input is not welcome. Thank you.