It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Dischord: .
Roughly you're describing the NWO, what brave lionheart people worldwide are trying to prevent, and eagerly lie a lives for it.
avatar
DarzaR: Roughly you're describing the NWO, what brave lionheart people worldwide are trying to prevent, and eagerly lie a lives for it.
Want something that works vs what doesn't.

Edit to add: NWO is a political creation that I do not acknowledge.
Post edited August 11, 2014 by Dischord
avatar
Dischord: Want something that works vs what doesn't.
You would keep that decision, if somebody would plant a bomb at your car\house?
avatar
DarzaR: You would keep that decision, if somebody would plant a bomb at your car\house?
I would do as necessary, as I would support anyone else that did the same, but frankly I do not see the linkage here.

You may go to attribute a linkage between thought on a higher realm, in which we spoke, to this more personal realm, but I want the linkage first; I don't see it.

Edit <sp>
Post edited August 11, 2014 by Dischord
avatar
DarzaR: You would keep that decision, if somebody would plant a bomb at your car\house?
avatar
Dischord: I would do as necessary, as I would support anyone else that did the same, but frankly I do not see the linkage here.

You may go to attribute a linkage between thought on a higher realm, in which we soke, to this more personal realm, but I want the linkage first; I don't see it.
Oh, thats simple - i meant - do you will prefer a working bomb, or one what doesnt (dud, malfunctioned) in this case?
avatar
HijacK: Since when are Irak and Libya super powers? You confuse UN with the League of Nations. The League of Nations was (faultily) designed to maintain world peace. UN was designed to keep the world/super powers in balance in order to prevent a WW3.
avatar
apehater: no i looked it up again, i meant the united nations organization (uno).
I'm I'm telling you again. The United Nations' primary objective is to keep superpowers in balance, not to assure the freedom of unstable countries. If the latter was the case,the organization would have ceased to exist a long time ago due to so many countries African and Middle East countries who just enter conflicts like it's nobody's business. Oh wait. It really isn't.
avatar
DarzaR: Oh, thats simple - i meant - do you will prefer a working bomb, or one what doesnt (dud, malfunctioned) in this case?
In what case? I still don't understand.
avatar
apehater: no i looked it up again, i meant the united nations organization (uno).
avatar
HijacK: I'm I'm telling you again. The United Nations' primary objective is to keep superpowers in balance, not to assure the freedom of unstable countries. If the latter was the case,the organization would have ceased to exist a long time ago due to so many countries African and Middle East countries who just enter conflicts like it's nobody's business. Oh wait. It really isn't.
for now i only see one super power in the world when it comes to the military part, requiered to conquer.

its the usa, no other nations or union has so much mobile amphibious units and air vehicle.

i havent seen how the uno succeed at balancing the usa actions in lybia or irak.
avatar
HijacK: I'm I'm telling you again. The United Nations' primary objective is to keep superpowers in balance, not to assure the freedom of unstable countries. If the latter was the case,the organization would have ceased to exist a long time ago due to so many countries African and Middle East countries who just enter conflicts like it's nobody's business. Oh wait. It really isn't.
You are truly misguided. UN have nothing to do with keeping "superpowers" in balance. Moreother, the only time it dare to act, its in case of "African and Middle East" like countries who enter conflict. And you have to get a lucky roll, so they would do even that.

"Dischord: Want something that works vs what doesn't.
You would keep that decision, if somebody would plant a bomb at your car\house?"

As i got you meant what you want it in general. "Working better than non-working in any case". If i got you wrong, sorry, im not so good in English, and its could happen, proved.

avatar
apehater: i havent seen how the uno succeed at balancing the usa actions in lybia or irak.
How could UN should been balancing USA in Lybia, if it was UN own decision? What about Rwanda and Timor-Leste also (anyway UN suck, thats obviously)? And mysteriously enough, USA waste theyr conquer potential for quite some years, while seemingly incapable countries somehow still manage to do it sometimes.
Post edited August 11, 2014 by DarzaR
avatar
HijacK: I'm I'm telling you again. The United Nations' primary objective is to keep superpowers in balance, not to assure the freedom of unstable countries. If the latter was the case,the organization would have ceased to exist a long time ago due to so many countries African and Middle East countries who just enter conflicts like it's nobody's business. Oh wait. It really isn't.
avatar
DarzaR: You are truly misguided. UN have nothing to do with keeping "superpowers" in balance. Moreother, the only time it dare to act, its in case of "African and Middle East" like countries who enter conflict. And you have to get a lucky roll, so they would do even that.

"Dischord: Want something that works vs what doesn't.
You would keep that decision, if somebody would plant a bomb at your car\house?"

As i got you meant what you want it in general. "Working better than non-working in any case". If i got you wrong, sorry, im not so good in English, and its could happen, proved.

avatar
apehater: i havent seen how the uno succeed at balancing the usa actions in lybia or irak.
avatar
DarzaR: How could UN should been balancing USA in Lybia, if it was UN own decision? What about Rwanda and Timor-Leste also (anyway UN suck, thats obviously)?
as i remember the usa did more that the un resolution allowed in lybia
avatar
apehater: for now i only see one super power in the world when it comes to the military part, requiered to conquer.

its the usa, no other nations or union has so much mobile amphibious units and air vehicle.

i havent seen how the uno succeed at balancing the usa actions in lybia or irak.
There is no superpower.

If there was, everyone that thinks we are so bad, and we are not perfect, would not exist.

Most people here have trouble finding their car keys in the morning, we don't want troubles.

Every nation is a superpower unto itself, and that is how it should be.

I don't speak for america, but I know many here as I live here; the people, in general, don't hate anyone except terrorists.
avatar
apehater: as i remember the usa did more that the un resolution allowed in lybia
Question was "how should they did that". "Please stop, you outkilled by one already?" or what?
I just want to say thanks to everyone I've spoken to, and those I didn't.

Given that this is a gaming site, I feel it only appropriate to place a code for Sacred Gold.

Please understand that the code can belong to anyone, whether they agree or not, like me or not, or have had a bowel movement today, or not.

Have fun:

Edit to remove code
Post edited August 11, 2014 by Dischord
avatar
Dischord: I just want to say thanks to everyone I've spoken to, and those I didn't.

Given that this is a gaming site, I feel it only appropriate to place a code for Sacred Gold.

Please understand that the code can belong to anyone, whether they agree or not, like me or not, or have had a bowel movement today, or not.
thank you

you were very polite during the discussion and i appreciate this, i have seen here in some threads people get very impolite.

but somehow the discussion in this thread is driven away from ukraine to uno and i'm ashamed to have supported this.
Post edited August 11, 2014 by apehater
avatar
apehater: thank you
No problem, is a good hack and slash with plenty of hidden areas :-)