Posted March 15, 2014
Matruchus: Ok I understand the reasoning behind this and this is good since it makes people safe. The only problem is that there is no way to really be sure if there is going to be more or less people then 50.000. The other guy should really not comment if he is not fluent enough that other people can understand him.
We have different regulation here. The demonstration needs to be registered at the police so they automatically protect the demonstrators. The organizators of the protest always have to provide private security forces to protect the demonstrators against other demonstrators. The organizaters of the demonstrations can be only fined if they don't registrate the demonstration with the police and the size of the demonstration is not important.
A demonstration as I see it is (supposed to be) a well-planned event when you more or less know who's going to participate beforehand. If, say, party A says it will bring 5,000 people, party B - 3,000 and party C - 1,800, you will hardly get over 10,000 people in total. But just to be safe you can declare there will be "no more than 25,000 people" and all's well. That gives the police the idea how many people to dispatch to ensure the safety of the demonstration. I'm not sure about private security forces, but most likely that's not one of the requirements.We have different regulation here. The demonstration needs to be registered at the police so they automatically protect the demonstrators. The organizators of the protest always have to provide private security forces to protect the demonstrators against other demonstrators. The organizaters of the demonstrations can be only fined if they don't registrate the demonstration with the police and the size of the demonstration is not important.
Post edited March 15, 2014 by Sanjuro