Shadowstalker16: They already are treated as businesses; seeing how they're a a tech company that pays taxes. There aren't laws that cover remedies for wronged youtubers or twitch streamers and any that are made would be instantly made obsolete by the usual practices used by giant corporations like ''they're contractors'' or ''they're not full timers'' or ''they're not employees''.
Focusing on insignificant things like this to get outrage clicks just hides the real problems because any attempt at trying to fix the real problems will be met with a million outraging internet apes rioting over what they were led to believe is a real problem.
§pec†re: I saw this recently and it reminded me of twitches scummy behaviour.
https://twitter.com/dpakman/status/1457753174735998979
As a result of hate-reporting of my @Twitch
stream, I have been banned for 30 days because a gory image was presented as evidence in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. Meanwhile, gory and sexual content in video games continues to be poured into the platform nonstop
§pec†re: FYI it wasn't that gory and you would see worse in a supermarket.
I'm not sure what your point is but it looks like your saying people using twitch are self employed thus have no rights but that doesn't remove twitches crimes by breaking or abusing their contracts or terms.
Most people are using twitch to play games or for fun instead of using it to turn a profit so the argument of self employed loopholes wouldn't apply anyway.
There are different laws for different countries so their actions will fall foul of some if not all of them.
No, I'm saying that even if twitch was properly treated as a business as you said, they'll resort to the usual set of excuses to continue wronging their creators. I'm not saying the creators are not deserving of rights but that twitch will easily walk over anyone because it isn't reliant on any one creator and no one would hold them to account for their end of the contract legally.
Rule enforcement is nepotistic on twitch and it has been for a long time but no one dares to take it up legally. People have been banned for technicalities while other who pushed the rules to their limits intentionally have walked free with no consequences. There is a whole soft camwhore section on twitch but the rules only apply to creators who made unintentional mistakes and get punished for it by pure technicality.
I used to have faith in the legal system and a belief that giant companies can be taken to task by the little guy. I realized that that's just not possible, at least vs tech giants like twitch or youtube.
Crosmando: I consider streaming to be one of the greatest threats to gaming. It encourages a passive mentality that says people are not to play video games but to watch other people playing them. You ever wonder why so many people own thousands of unplayed games on Steam, with it being likely they'll never play them all in their lifetime?
Twitch streamers especially are more personality than game. Youtube LPers may be used a substitute by some people who can't play a game but in re twitch streamers, the people are there for the streamer and not the game. And most of them play multiplayer games in the first place, and most of the games they play are games like fortnite or apex or MMO RPGs, which don't have a low player problem.