It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
avatar
Dracomut1990: I agree there are plenty of old games that do what they did better than new games that tried to copy them, I just want respect for the new games that do unquestionably manage to trump the classics that came before them.
avatar
rjbuffchix: Okay...but I think it is far from "unquestionable" that the newer games are better and yes that includes all the games you listed in this topic. How do you go about proving "unquestionable"? One would think based on objective facts about the game and what it does/doesn't do. But when I tried to work with something objective like this, amount of freedom in the game, you went on to talk about how some people prefer less of it, shifting discussion to subjective.

avatar
Dracomut1990: Also what do you mean by "the game plays you" games? You mean like games that mess with the player like Undertale?
avatar
rjbuffchix: No, sorry. I mean really linear ones with next to no flexibility. It was just an expression.

avatar
Dracomut1990: I'm not too convinced. If they actually wanted to make limited access to their older content, they would try to shut down trading stores.

Many gamers both old and young have found a preference in physical media that digital media, for all its strengths, cannot provide... Now to be fair both Microsoft and Sony did try to do that, but they have since abandoned this.
avatar
rjbuffchix: So in other words, they did want to make limited access to their older content already. Maybe you have a more optimistic view of how these companies have seen the light and are now all about the consumer. I do not share such a view :)

avatar
Dracomut1990: Mainly because I don't want these posts to become freaking novels. I made this post as a joke, not to be a debate section... Which it has become much to my annoyance. Though rest assured I have taken these stats into account and weighed them.
avatar
rjbuffchix: You posted a 100 point list, but proving your claim would result in the post becoming a "novel"? Sorry, I don't buy that. You're the one making the claim, dude. It's not unreasonable to expect substantiation. I don't think the conversation would've dovetailed so much if it weren't for posting your "bad games list" out of nowhere. Just my opinion on that though.

avatar
Dracomut1990: One thing I do wish to propose to you though are taking into account "quality of life" improvements. This is where freedom has often be sacrificed, but generally to great success. As an example: Skyrim does not have anywhere near as much flexibility as Oblivion or especially Morrowind, but has ultimately become the most played gamed in the whole franchise thanks to the creators finding the right balance between giving the players freedom and simplifying things. Personally I think Oblivion is the better game thanks to it's larger amount of control, but I would lying if I said I enjoyed it more than the much more streamlined Skyrim. This is similar I'd say between Witcher 2 and 3... Though in that case I do think 3 is just plain better.
avatar
rjbuffchix: While that's a fair point, remember that one person's quality of life improvement is another person's detriment to the experience. There are many Elder Scrolls players who will tell you how the creators did not "find the right balance" with Skyrim, or even with Oblivion (compared to the earlier entries), for that matter. Also many quality of life improvements are quite different from the old ways, different enough that usually people will prefer one version strongly over the other.

Also, I'd like to thank you for the discussion. I am not trying to annoy you. I am just trying to show why these various factors would be relevant to consumers/readers.
I always find the reactions of fans a good indication, if someone who doesn't care for Breath of the Wild happily admits it is still amazing that is a good sign. Also comparing faults is another good one, for there are flaws in games that are objectively bad and universally despised.

Ahh thank you for clarifying. Again though linearity has a beauty all its own.

Not really optimistic, more realistic: the reason Sony and Microsoft stopped is because of the backlash that happened when they tried to limit trading. This is an indication that they are at least savvy to know when to listen to their fans.

No, I mean even LONGER than that one. Plus that list was so easy to make, more than half were bad games I listed just off the top of my head. Though I honestly wasn’t expecting people to actually be offended by it... Who in their right mind thinks some of the games I have on it are even remotely defendable? I know people have different tastes, but garbage is garbage no matter how you slice it.

You are very welcome.
Post edited September 11, 2019 by Dracomut1990
avatar
Dracomut1990: Oh wait no, you are just being ignorant. You can dislike new games all you want, but saying that modern gaming is nothing trash is just dumb.
That's hilarious considering I never said I disliked new games. You just made that up. I like plenty of new games. If you need to invent stuff to argue against, you already soundly lost. I also clearly never said that modern gaming is nothing but trash, you just made that up too. So I accept your implicit admission that you have no valid arguments.
Also no you can’t make s game in a day, that is especially ignorant. Do your research in game development before trying to talk about it.
Um, yeah, I've actually made games (and made money off them), I know far more about it than you. You really don't know anything about game jams? You make a game in a day, or at most a weekend. Talk about ignorance!
I am fully aware of all the copy-paste trash that is released, but again: problem with gaming since day one.
You're weren't aware of the extent until I told you, but like I said you'd do earlier, you're just trying to hand-wave it away and say that it doesn't count. The amount of it objectively and measurably worse now.
90% of everything is trash.
So, you admit that modern gaming isn't better.
low rated
avatar
Dracomut1990: Oh wait no, you are just being ignorant. You can dislike new games all you want, but saying that modern gaming is nothing trash is just dumb.
avatar
eric5h5: That's hilarious considering I never said I disliked new games. You just made that up. I like plenty of new games. If you need to invent stuff to argue against, you already soundly lost. I also clearly never said that modern gaming is nothing but trash, you just made that up too. So I accept your implicit admission that you have no valid arguments.

Also no you can’t make s game in a day, that is especially ignorant. Do your research in game development before trying to talk about it.
avatar
eric5h5: Um, yeah, I've actually made games (and made money off them), I know far more about it than you. You really don't know anything about game jams? You make a game in a day, or at most a weekend. Talk about ignorance!

I am fully aware of all the copy-paste trash that is released, but again: problem with gaming since day one.
avatar
eric5h5: You're weren't aware of the extent until I told you, but like I said you'd do earlier, you're just trying to hand-wave it away and say that it doesn't count. The amount of it objectively and measurably worse now.

90% of everything is trash.
avatar
eric5h5: So, you admit that modern gaming isn't better.
"And? There are 100 worse games released every day now. If you want to be objective, modern gaming is objectively worse. Totally insane amounts of churned-out asset flip shovelware released for mobile and Steam."
"Nope. It's absolutely worse now. Making anything at all, even garbage, used to take at least a little effort and ability, so it was relatively limited compared to today."
Do you have short-term memory loss or something?

Considering I have a degree in game design I doubt it. Could you actually post links to your games to prove to us you aren't lying?

No, it is it miles better than it is in the old days. Today the shovelware is mainly just on PC, whereas there used to be ample shovelware on all platforms.

It is, that doesn't meant there still isn't a lot of crap.
avatar
Dracomut1990: "And? There are 100 worse games released every day now. If you want to be objective, modern gaming is objectively worse. Totally insane amounts of churned-out asset flip shovelware released for mobile and Steam."
"Nope. It's absolutely worse now. Making anything at all, even garbage, used to take at least a little effort and ability, so it was relatively limited compared to today."
Do you have short-term memory loss or something?
No. Can you argue without resorting to insults? And what does my quote have to do with anything? It doesn't say anything you claimed I said, and indeed proves to everyone you just make stuff up.
Considering I have a degree in game design I doubt it. Could you actually post links to your games to prove to us you aren't lying?
Can you post a photo of your degree in game design to prove you're not lying? Note that so-called "degrees in game design" are almost always worthless and are basically a joke in the industry. Primarily scams designed to part kids dreaming about being video game creators from their money. Get a CS degree if you actually want something useful that means anything.

If I posted links you'd just say I was lying about making the games, because you can't accept being wrong. How about this...a neutral party will announce a simple game idea at a pre-determined date and time, then each of us makes a game using that idea, and must post a link to a downloadable version of the game within 24 hours. Deal?
No, it is it miles better than it is in the old days.
It's far, far worse. Literally hundreds of trash games are churned out every week, if not thousands. It used to take at least a year to get that many.
low rated
avatar
Dracomut1990: "And? There are 100 worse games released every day now. If you want to be objective, modern gaming is objectively worse. Totally insane amounts of churned-out asset flip shovelware released for mobile and Steam."
"Nope. It's absolutely worse now. Making anything at all, even garbage, used to take at least a little effort and ability, so it was relatively limited compared to today."
Do you have short-term memory loss or something?
avatar
eric5h5: No. Can you argue without resorting to insults? And what does my quote have to do with anything? It doesn't say anything you claimed I said, and indeed proves to everyone you just make stuff up.

Considering I have a degree in game design I doubt it. Could you actually post links to your games to prove to us you aren't lying?
avatar
eric5h5: Can you post a photo of your degree in game design to prove you're not lying? Note that so-called "degrees in game design" are almost always worthless and are basically a joke in the industry. Primarily scams designed to part kids dreaming about being video game creators from their money. Get a CS degree if you actually want something useful that means anything.

If I posted links you'd just say I was lying about making the games, because you can't accept being wrong. How about this...a neutral party will announce a simple game idea at a pre-determined date and time, then each of us makes a game using that idea, and must post a link to a downloadable version of the game within 24 hours. Deal?

No, it is it miles better than it is in the old days.
avatar
eric5h5: It's far, far worse. Literally hundreds of trash games are churned out every week, if not thousands. It used to take at least a year to get that many.
Practice what you preach, you have made it clear you don't have any respect for anyone so I see no reason for any decorum at this point. Those were quotes literally from your old posts, proving you indeed dislike and think many new games are trash. If that was not your intention, you did a very bad job at communicating it. If you actually have a brain, use it already.

I already have that too, I make sure to cover all bases in case game design is not profitable. If you aren't confident enough to post links to your own games, I see no reason to trust you with a picture of my degrees. Call me cowardly all you want, but you were who refused first after very brazenly announcing you can make a functional game people would pay for in a day. Thank you for further making yourself look like a disgusting and sad person though.

Why on earth would I make a deal with someone who demonstrated to have the both the emotional capacity and honesty of a 4 year old? Pass.

You are confusing this generation with the lates 90's to all of the 00's. Either that or that or you need to work on your math.
Post edited September 11, 2019 by Dracomut1990
Ahhhh, yes, it's good to be back!

I missed the place! :P
low rated
avatar
tinyE: Ahhhh, yes, it's good to be back!

I missed the place! :P
I can certainly see why. We got a good mixture of actually decent people to talk with and really angry failures to annoyed with.
Post edited September 11, 2019 by Dracomut1990
avatar
tinyE: Ahhhh, yes, it's good to be back!

I missed the place! :P
avatar
Dracomut1990: I can certainly see why. We got a good mixture of actually decent people to talk with and really angry failures to laugh at.
Don't worry. I'm sure I'll be banned again by the end of the night. :P
low rated
Hooboy, I did not expect this post to become so controversial so quickly. I know the nostalgic people on this site can get emotional but dang... Say old games aren't perfect and that there is some good in modern games, suddenly some of them are out for blood.
If you are triggered by this list then I apologize for the offense, though I do ask to keep your response civil. Whilst it does contain what I think are legit problems with reviews on GOG, in the end this is just meant to be a good-natured joke. If you disagree with gag commandments then I would be happy to hear what you think would work better. Angry comments will be ignored, someone having a difference of opinion as you is no reason to get riled up and bitter.
avatar
Dracomut1990: Hooboy, I did not expect this post to become so controversial so quickly. I know the nostalgic people on this site can get emotional but dang... Say old games aren't perfect and that there is some good in modern games, suddenly some of them are out for blood.
If you are triggered by this list then I apologize for the offense, though I do ask to keep your response civil. Whilst it does contain what I think are legit problems with reviews on GOG, in the end this is just meant to be a good-natured joke. If you disagree with gag commandments then I would be happy to hear what you think would work better. Angry comments will be ignored, someone having a difference of opinion as you is no reason to get riled up and bitter.
It's a stab in the dark but I think post 9 put a few off.
low rated
avatar
Dracomut1990: Hooboy, I did not expect this post to become so controversial so quickly. I know the nostalgic people on this site can get emotional but dang... Say old games aren't perfect and that there is some good in modern games, suddenly some of them are out for blood.
If you are triggered by this list then I apologize for the offense, though I do ask to keep your response civil. Whilst it does contain what I think are legit problems with reviews on GOG, in the end this is just meant to be a good-natured joke. If you disagree with gag commandments then I would be happy to hear what you think would work better. Angry comments will be ignored, someone having a difference of opinion as you is no reason to get riled up and bitter.
avatar
Tauto: It's a stab in the dark but I think post 9 put a few off.
Probably, I have a bad habit of coming across much gruffer and more aggressive than I really intend
avatar
Dracomut1990: Those were quotes literally from your old posts, proving you indeed dislike and think many new games are trash.
Point out the part, exactly, that says I dislike new games. Yes, I did indeed say many (indeed most) new games are trash. That was kind of the whole point.
Why on earth would I make a deal with someone who demonstrated to have the both the emotional capacity and honesty of a 4 year old? Pass.
OK, so you're all talk with nothing to back it up. Thought so. I will totally make a 24-hour game if you agree to the terms above. I'm right here on public record. But I guess this is your way of admitting you don't know anything about making games.

By the way, here's a link to a game jam calendar, since you were unaware that it's possible to make games in 24 hours. In fact you can see one group has a 1-hour game jam. And now I see a 30-minute jam! That's a new one on me...24 hours is one thing, but half an hour does seem a tad brief.
avatar
Tauto: It's a stab in the dark but I think post 9 put a few off.
avatar
Dracomut1990: Probably, I have a bad habit of coming across much gruffer and more aggressive than I really intend
You're a kitten.
low rated
avatar
Dracomut1990: Probably, I have a bad habit of coming across much gruffer and more aggressive than I really intend
avatar
Tauto: You're a kitten.
Thank you very much :)
Post edited September 11, 2019 by Dracomut1990
low rated
avatar
Dracomut1990: Those were quotes literally from your old posts, proving you indeed dislike and think many new games are trash.
avatar
eric5h5: Point out the part, exactly, that says I dislike new games. Yes, I did indeed say many (indeed most) new games are trash. That was kind of the whole point.

Why on earth would I make a deal with someone who demonstrated to have the both the emotional capacity and honesty of a 4 year old? Pass.
avatar
eric5h5: OK, so you're all talk with nothing to back it up. Thought so. I will totally make a 24-hour game if you agree to the terms above. I'm right here on public record. But I guess this is your way of admitting you don't know anything about making games.

By the way, here's a link to a game jam calendar, since you were unaware that it's possible to make games in 24 hours. In fact you can see one group has a 1-hour game jam. And now I see a 30-minute jam! That's a new one on me...24 hours is one thing, but half an hour does seem a tad brief.
So you denied your own argument earlier because...?

Dude, you have literally been nothing but talk. You make claims to have made games, but refuse to post links to them or even describe them and you make assumptions to cover up your tracks. Why would I partake in a deal with a dishonest wimp like that? If you actually do work with games I'd hate to be on your team or be forced to consult with you... You have not demonstrated a very stable or polite personality.

I know a game can be made in 24 hours, just not something substantial. Nor anything that is sold commercially like you implied.
Post edited September 11, 2019 by Dracomut1990