Posted July 11, 2015
Telika: Framing it like this (while we still have to see what concessions, symbolic or not, if any, will be made to syriza - on the debt relief front, for instance) has two functions : 1° Reminding all countries that rebelling leads to even worse punishment. 2° Informing the anti-austerity voters that Syriza is "even worse" than ND.
As said earlier, several observers speculated that the EU demands were purposefully harsh in order to have syriza break down either by failing the negociations or by strongly betraying their promises. As things seem to take this second direction, it's the narrative that is now being capitalized on.
There are reasons to be anxous about the outcome of this strategy. People won't necessarily turn to ND or Potami...
You must have missed the think-tank report (circulated around the time the Greece problem started) that a Greece under military dictatorship would be better for EU financial interests... since you'd have someone in power who could enforce reforms ;) If that is really the agenda behind this then Greece has already lost. Syriza plans on cutting defense spending... and remember that Greece has the 5th largest military in europe. by accident? or was this machined for this very purpose? As said earlier, several observers speculated that the EU demands were purposefully harsh in order to have syriza break down either by failing the negociations or by strongly betraying their promises. As things seem to take this second direction, it's the narrative that is now being capitalized on.
There are reasons to be anxous about the outcome of this strategy. People won't necessarily turn to ND or Potami...
I still believe the EU will give zero concessions to Syriza, by walking out and doing that referendum Syriza probably planned on losing that via yes vote and give control to some new interim government without losing face, I don't think Syriza ever actually planned for winning the "no" vote. And I firmly believe the EU did plan for them to win the No vote, in fact I think the engagement for a YES was specifically so that the Greek people believe that is what the EU wanted. Remember, EU has their own think tanks and agendas, they can do geo political shenanigans like anyone else. But then that's just baseless conspiracy theory on my part... that EU politicians tried to influence the Referendum was a clear sign something was amiss. Usually that is absolutely taboo for EU politicians to engage in ANY national democratic actions. If *That* was the real agenda behind everything that happened since Syriza won, including canning varoufakis and this new offer, then I must say the EU is way more powerful and... cynically evil than I ever gave it credit for. I always thought of EU as a mentally unstable Alzheimer patient... but maybe these things are not mutually exclusive...
Just watched an interesting docu (partially) about the refugee situation at some Greek Islands, where refugees are basically marauding over the island, plundering and destroying stuff with no police or military help (they are looking for food!), the Greek people there are left to fend for themselves. For the record, what I saw definitely puts Greece on the same level as Albania or Serbia in terms of "absence of state control". To even contemplate extending this suffering with further debt.. is beyond absurd. Greece needs to gain proper control over it's islands, feed it's people
Greek people need hope and a vision for the future, they need to be able to feed themselves at the very least, to have access to medicine and water, electricity and gas/oil in the winter. And let's face it, whether in 50 years or now, the debt is lost. Let's face that head-on instead of prolonging it and raising the losses into the infinite.. but it doesn't seem that EU consensus goes in that direction. ;/
I didn't think the situation is THAT bad there. But that docu I saw basically showed a nation on the brink of total collapse. Pays off to watch obscure German TV channels at midnight I guess..
Post edited July 11, 2015 by eRe4s3r