As opposed to no one deserved to be listen at all unless it fit a certain social justice criteria?

I know the system is not perfect, but I think no censorship unless it break the law / doxx / death mail is better then that.

Deserved to be listen is not same as deserved to be followed. People can say whatever they want as their right, but its up to the criticism of others. If the majority humanity intelligence is worth something, statements that is illogical will not be followed, or when hitting a brick wall by following the statement, the majority of humanity will learn to turn back.

Puritans, Dragon Crown has arts similar to great comic artists and exaggerated almost fat women, if for puritans like most part of these SJW were existed before some of the better movies, stories, even books or music were will never been released, or fiercely criticized.

Is a SICK generation, impregnated by a new conservative values, mixed with "leftist" ideals, as I said is so twisted that can accept misogyny in religions, and get crazy about cartoons.

That may be the case, it can be handled like get him to apologize regardless he is right or not..
Like what GoG did, when one employee dared state his / her personal views before processing refunds on Pillars of Eternity.

These days PR people have no rights to their personal views when they sign up for the job, without risking their job......

Yeah I keep mixing those 2 games up, I meant dragon's crown

<looks at attachment>
I'm not seeing how she is "loli" at all "tall" "leggy" "busty" "woman" does not equal child to me.

Excellent! Followed by an interview with the always enlightening legendary Graham Hancock!

Sound only Hancock interview.

Also, the youtube versions are slightly shorter and you can actually see them talking! Amazing!

Rusty_Gunn
That's funny because Alexander is doing pretty well for herself, working for boingboing and all.

RWarehall
So I'm stupid for listening to academics, sociologists, and others who go through the peer review process? I'm sorry, but I don't think that makes me stupid. And pointing out a lack of diversity isn't a lie, and neither is pointing out misogyny. It's all a matter of perspective, and opinion.

You are stupid for not thinking for yourself and not listening to others. You are just a troll. We pointed out how the 77% statistic is misleading...where's your response? (chirp chirp chirp)
We've shown that in the attempt to answer the question whether women are making the same as men FOR THE SAME WORK, they essentially are within a number of cents on a dollar. But you have your head stuck so far up your own ass to realize it.

Please, show us the "misogyny". Do you even know what the word means? I think not...
And the fact you feel there is no issue in exaggerating and distorting the truth makes you a complete and total asshole. Opinion is not an excuse for being an idiot...

Alexander is not doing well working for boingboing. First of all her page has much less reach than where she was before, not only that, nobody except for people with the same political agenda visits it. And BoingBoing might face legal issues soon.

RWarehall

Yes, I heard what you had to say about the statics, and you've never given an aqueduct explanation for why they are misleading. Other than misplaced distrust in authority, you got nothing. So please, enlighten me.

Seriously? Unless you're a millionaire with a conservative portfolio, you're not secure. You might be comfortable right now, but god help you if you ever lose your job and can't find another one, because we don't as a society provide any meaningful support to white men that are down on their luck.

This is the same basic rhetoric that the rich use to rationalize why they have things they didn't earn and it's equally specious here. You've been fortunate enough not to get cancer or have a brain injury, there's absolutely no reason why it couldn't happen to you. And if it does, I'm sure you'll still be fighting for women's rights even as you notice that there's no place in any of the homeless shelters for men and that the money that's been placed on encouraging women to displace men in various sectors of the economy could more reasonably have been used for non-sexist purposes. Like finding homes for all of the homeless.

For better or for worse, society values women and considers men to be cannon fodder and mostly deserving of whatever they get. I think it's bullshit.

Statistics and those who present them aren't authority. The main statistic used for the gender pay gap conspiracy is arrived at by counting all the men and counting all the women and then dividing the total salary money spent between them. So if there are more men than women, it will lead to men having higher ''pay'' in this ''study'', if women are lesser and earn more than men, the salary of individual women may be higher but males may win out due to numbers.

Using that study as some kind proof is seriously delusional. Milo conducted a similar ''study'' with con vs lib journos. He divided journos into lib and con and collected a total salary paid statistic by adding up salaries from all the journo outlets. Then he divided the number among among the number of lib and con journos. Lib journos earn more. Because there are more of them. Con journos earn less but there are only a few of them. So if your an equity person and believe in the ''gender pay gap''; you gotta believe in this too.

So what is socjus's plan to breach the con-lib pay divide?

I'm just going to leave this here: http://blog.dilbert.com/post/133406477506/global-gender-war .

Oh sweet i didnt know there was a gamergate thread here, good to know the discussion is going all over the place.

So is Ryan like a troll or sometihng?