I'm not sure it is going to hit me.... so I guess am not a gamer?

*speaking word to the power*

is that abuse? well i better call the cops because i get abused on a daily basis.

You bet you do. You are abused on a daily basis. And the way things are going you can excpect more. Aside from everything not to do with gaming - denigration of gamers is just part of it. What we're witnessing is just the start. They are coming for your games, they're taking your right to chose what you play and how you play it. If you let them.

@amok - the expression is "Speak truth to power"

EDIT @amok (again) - "Speaking truth to power". I think you understand what it means.;-)

DOUBLE EDIT @amok
LOL. Good luck in that solopsistic nightmare world! :-)

TRIPLE EDIT@amok
That's alright. There's no need to feel compelled to impress me.

makes the presumption that you think that there is 'a truth'...

So you believe in multiple universes? Or only multiple perceptions? Or you just trolled me :)

@noncompliantgame, reply to PM:

Indeed I will presume what I will, same as with anyone else. And that is partly the crust ( :) ) of the problem.

But, all you can speak (or in case of the forum - type) are words, not truths. There are no truths, only different perspectives. So you can not speak any truth, or the truth you speak is only true to yourself. Add in the problem of communication and meanings.... and it is a mess. So I will speak words to the power (this time you :)), and all I can hope for is that some of those words will have some impact.
answered above, I think

but I may not agree with it, and therefor not use it. I do not think is is possible to speak any 'truth' to anything, as 'the truth' do not exist. I can only speak words...

Argh, radical constructivism... damn Watzlawick and his colleagues...

no, that's taking it to the extreme. There are shared understandings and patterns, but it is not the same as 'a truth'. At best you can hope for is shared 'truths', but it do not mean that your shared 'truths' are more valid than mine.

Ah so that's it; he committed the unfathomable crime of calling Anita a "charlatan" so that's what made him a "hate monger"... and not just any hate monger, but an opportunistic one at that (the worst kind). Thinking about it; "supporting" GG, even indirectly or accidentally, usually cause a hate mob to jump on your throat, I fail to see what part of that is "opportunistic". (Well at least you didn't call him a right wing nut-job, so I guess you are making progress).

But seriously are you really so bigoted that you cannot even consider the fact that peoples might have a different opinion that yours without being "hate mongers", "opportunistic", whatever, that they might have this opinion because well... you know... it's actually what they believe in ?

That's the problem with several members of your "side", you included, you are so indulged in your own self righteousness that you cannot even tolerate any dissident/different opinion, anybody who dare to have one becomes immediately a hater, extremist, hate campaign supporter, or are even proclaimed honorific GG leader, regardless of how they express said opinion or the arguments they might give. Never thought that maybe it's because of all this hate and intolerance that some peoples have a low opinion of "SJW" ?

Him too ? wasn't it John Bain that was supposed to get his ass bitten too ? Damn, not being on the anti-GG side seems more dangerous for your derrière than being in prison :)

And yet, wasn't it Brianna Wu that had to grovel to be back in AGG's good graces & not brad Wardell with GG over them sharing a drink?

Are you not the one who went around chastising people for breaking up bundles? Or is bundle piracy (as you called it) one of those "truths" that's somehow more valid than those held by others?

Not that it's relevant to the discussion or anything, nor do I necessarily disagree. Just seems like you aren't in any position to be throwing those particular stones given that bit of sanctimony.

One plus one equals two.
*speaking truth to the power*

:D

Ok then, thanks for the living example of my argument around objectivity. You believe in multiple perceptions, to the point you presume objective existence is only surreal; no actual reality.

Alas for postmodernism subjectivity's reign... may it be short.