Maxvorstadt: You maybe heard, that "Pony Island" was removed from GoG due to swiss animal rights activists. But this is only the peak of the Iceberg!
Miss Ponyklatscher, chairwoman of "Animals R Us", a swiss animal rights organisation, said: "We will force GoG to take all games, that include animals, from the store. We want to protect the rights of animals, no matter if they are real life animals or digital animals!".
While that quote do appear in the youtube video, it is delivered in an tongue-in-cheek way, a bit like that PC master race thing. The OP is taking an exagered, self-ironic parole totally out of context!
If you watch the video in its entirety, you will find that Miss Ponyklatscher make a pretty compelling case.
It may seem a bit much to talk about "prejudices towards animals". We really needed another term here, something a bit less loaded. But once you begin to be concious about how animals are presented in various media, including games, you can't help but notice that it is all pretty stereotypical and reactionary. Like, sharks are always presented as human-devouring baddies. Of course, this is a trope that have its merits - killer sharks are fun - but wouldn't it be nice if we sometimes could think a bit outside the box? A pure shark sim in the style of
Shelter? Or a diving game where sharks behaved realistically for once?
Regarding the removal of "Pony Island", I don't see why it is such a bad thing. "Animals R Us" wrote a letter to GoG. After reading the letter, GoG found that they agreed with its argument, and decided to remove the game from their store. I'm not sure I would have removed it myself, but GoG has always been picky about which games it chooses to sell, and I think they have the right to decide which games they want to sell.