It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
avatar
Breja: I've no idea what point you're trying to make.
Something about the basic elements of drama, and getting old. Remember when Punk was basically recycling rock n roll? Recycling is life.

Every older generation says that new things are just recycled old things, with a fresh layer of paint.
Post edited February 09, 2020 by teceem
avatar
Breja: I've no idea what point you're trying to make.
avatar
teceem: Something about the basic elements of drama, and getting old. Remember when Punk was basically recycling rock n roll? Recycling is life.

Every older generation says that new things are just recycled old things, with a fresh layer of paint.
I don't think you understood me at all. I wasn't complaining about reusing the plot. I was defending the show from accusations of doing something "true" Trek would never do, by pointing out something very, very similiar was already done in Trek years ago.
low rated
avatar
Breja: I don't think you understood me at all. I wasn't complaining about reusing the plot. I was defending the show from accusations of doing something "true" Trek would never do, by pointing out something very, very similiar was already done in Trek years ago.
I see! We're never too old to have a good old fashioned misunderstanding. ;-)
(Can I call it a sign of respect? Why were you getting into "Trekkie arguments? You know how pointless those can be. ;-) )

Anyway, at least we're not rambling about it for 45 minutes on Youtube, calling it a review. :-P
avatar
Breja: As a long time fan (I rewatched TNG for what must be at least a 4th time last year, and I'm rewatching DS9 for at least the 3rd time right now), I can already say that the timeline makes very little sense here. Apparently in 6 years we went from "no one, even Data, could succesfully recreate a Soong-type android" to mass producing them, just like that. Also apparently they were basically used as slave labor, exactly what the legendary episode Measure of a Man was supposed to prevent, yet never is it even discussed.
In Voyager it was established that they used the old EMH for slave labor. Which makes sense, if something goes wrong the most damage you get are some busted hologram emitters. But with Androids, you would never see a return of investment, if even one get's damaged while welding or carrying stuff.
low rated
avatar
Breja: As a long time fan (I rewatched TNG for what must be at least a 4th time last year, and I'm rewatching DS9 for at least the 3rd time right now), I can already say that the timeline makes very little sense here. Apparently in 6 years we went from "no one, even Data, could succesfully recreate a Soong-type android" to mass producing them, just like that. Also apparently they were basically used as slave labor, exactly what the legendary episode Measure of a Man was supposed to prevent, yet never is it even discussed.
avatar
Acriz: In Voyager it was established that they used the old EMH for slave labor. Which makes sense, if something goes wrong the most damage you get are some busted hologram emitters. But with Androids, you would never see a return of investment, if even one get's damaged while welding or carrying stuff.
Reply to both of you:
I've only seen 2 episodes, but didn't they say that they weren't even near at replicating a "Data". That the androids that attacked Mars were very functional but didn't contain any of Soong's "special sauce".

Return of investment? I've never seen a cost comparison between producing/installing holodeck emitters and the creation of a basic android.

I've seen a lot more inconsistencies in Enterprise and Discovery, but this show just started. Details...
low rated
avatar
teceem: I've only seen 2 episodes, but didn't they say that they weren't even near at replicating a "Data". That the androids that attacked Mars were very functional but didn't contain any of Soong's "special sauce".
Possibly, but it still seems to me like quite jump to go from no androids whatsoever to mass produced fully functional ones in just 6 years. I guess I just don't understand why not have those events happen a bit later, say 15 years after Nemesis, still leaving 5 years for Picard to spend in retirement (quite enough, I think).

But yeah, those are details, and if the show picks up the pace and doesn't piss me off with anything new, I won't be inclined to nitpick so much.

avatar
Acriz: In Voyager it was established that they used the old EMH for slave labor. Which makes sense, if something goes wrong the most damage you get are some busted hologram emitters. But with Androids, you would never see a return of investment, if even one get's damaged while welding or carrying stuff.
Well, unless they managed to duplicate the mobile emitter future-tech, holograms would have very limited use.
Post edited February 09, 2020 by Breja
low rated
avatar
babark: Surprised this thread hasn't started yet, the closest I could find (through gog's own forum search and the internet) is a thread about the trailer from 6 months ago that inevitably descended into political BS discussion.
If I'm mistaken, and there is a thread, sorry, please direct me to it!
Picard series was already discussed here:
avatar
Breja: Actually if anything the story in Picard is all to familiar. Remember Star Trek VI? That's basicaly the same set-up - catastrophe in the Klingon Empire, and a very strong push back against helping them from some of Starfleet's top bras. Right down to a conspiracy to murder the chancellor and torpedo the peace initiative.
Honestly, I don't remember that. I mean, I remember torpedo, but it were Klingons, not Humans.
Post edited February 10, 2020 by LootHunter
avatar
LootHunter: Honestly, I don't remember that. I mean, I remember torpedo, but it were Klingons, not Humans.
There was a conspiracy between Klingon and Starfleet hardliners who were both opposed to the peace initiative (that female Vulcan officer on the Enterprise was part of it). And background to the whole story was that Chernobyl-like moon near the Klingon home world blowing up.
Anyway, I liked TNG, but have zero interest in this Picard show, imo Star Trek is pretty much dead. imo it's a mistake that they're putting so heavy emphasis on over-arching storylines in all the new shows, this was already annoying in the Enterprise series (wow, that was already 20 years ago, how time flies), though I suppose the older more episodic format would feel outdated today.
Post edited February 10, 2020 by morolf
avatar
morolf: Anyway, I liked TNG, but have zero interest in this Picard show, imo Star Trek is pretty much dead.....
I had held out a tiny, smallest, of hopes that Patrick Stewart would make a difference, but it seems he is here for a payday (and why not, as he is getting on a bit) rather than try to steer Trek back on track.

Abrams has succesfully destroyed two of my all time favourite sci-fi franchises, Trek and Star Wars. It's almost like he hated the original sources before getting involved in them? Or at the very least totally not 'getting' them and what made them classics in the sci-fi genre (well developed stories and characters)?
avatar
teceem: I've only seen 2 episodes, but didn't they say that they weren't even near at replicating a "Data". That the androids that attacked Mars were very functional but didn't contain any of Soong's "special sauce".
avatar
Breja: Possibly, but it still seems to me like quite jump to go from no androids whatsoever to mass produced fully functional ones in just 6 years. I guess I just don't understand why not have those events happen a bit later, say 15 years after Nemesis, still leaving 5 years for Picard to spend in retirement (quite enough, I think).

But yeah, those are details, and if the show picks up the pace and doesn't piss me off with anything new, I won't be inclined to nitpick so much.

avatar
Acriz: In Voyager it was established that they used the old EMH for slave labor. Which makes sense, if something goes wrong the most damage you get are some busted hologram emitters. But with Androids, you would never see a return of investment, if even one get's damaged while welding or carrying stuff.
avatar
Breja: Well, unless they managed to duplicate the mobile emitter future-tech, holograms would have very limited use.
Rather than boldly go into the depths of space, Picard is far more interested in exploring the depths of its famous leader. In doing so, the series more than justifies its existence in today's nostalgia-driven era.

Smart, well-crafted, layered - verging on over-layered.

Picard is Trek through and through, full of thorny ethical quandaries, social allegories, sinister admirals, and an undercurrent of optimism in spite of it all.
burger king customer survey
Post edited February 11, 2020 by Jay_den
low rated
avatar
Breja: Actually if anything the story in Picard is all to familiar. Remember Star Trek VI? That's basicaly the same set-up - catastrophe in the Klingon Empire, and a very strong push back against helping them from some of Starfleet's top bras. Right down to a conspiracy to murder the chancellor and torpedo the peace initiative.
avatar
LootHunter: Honestly, I don't remember that. I mean, I remember torpedo, but it were Klingons, not Humans.
I think you need to rewatch the film. Or at least read a wiki entry about a certain admiral.
low rated
avatar
ThorChild: Abrams has succesfully destroyed two of my all time favourite sci-fi franchises, Trek and Star Wars.
He did that all by himself? Wow!
Anyway, Abrams had no involvement in ST: Picard, or in any of the other Star Trek tv series.
low rated
avatar
ThorChild: Abrams has succesfully destroyed two of my all time favourite sci-fi franchises, Trek and Star Wars.
avatar
teceem: He did that all by himself? Wow!
Anyway, Abrams had no involvement in ST: Picard, or in any of the other Star Trek tv series.
Sshh. Histerically rage-whining about Abrams is apparently the fashionable thing to do now. No point trying to reason with people doing it.
low rated
avatar
LootHunter: Honestly, I don't remember that. I mean, I remember torpedo, but it were Klingons, not Humans.
avatar
Breja: I think you need to rewatch the film. Or at least read a wiki entry about a certain admiral.
Thanks, now I recall it - how Humans, Vulcans, Klingons and Romulans joined together in conspiracy to prevent Humans and Klingons from joining together.
avatar
ThorChild: Abrams has succesfully destroyed two of my all time favourite sci-fi franchises, Trek and Star Wars.
When talking about Star Wars you really shouldn't forget about Kennedy. She is a woman and in this day and age women should be properly credited for their contributions.
Post edited February 10, 2020 by LootHunter
low rated
avatar
teceem: He did that all by himself? Wow!
Anyway, Abrams had no involvement in ST: Picard, or in any of the other Star Trek tv series.
avatar
Breja: Sshh. Histerically rage-whining about Abrams is apparently the fashionable thing to do now. No point trying to reason with people doing it.
Yeah, like the peeps who rage-whine about Trump. I feel ya, bruh. lol