It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
darthspudius: I haven't tried that yet. Is it good?
avatar
Tauto: Excellant.
im guessing you need both games to install?
low rated
avatar
Tauto: Excellant.
avatar
darthspudius: im guessing you need both games to install?
Correct.
avatar
darthspudius: im guessing you need both games to install?
avatar
Tauto: Correct.
Neat, I have added it to my list of things to do haha.
avatar
Atlantico: If you patch it, which you can, there are no bugs to speak of. It was no more buggy than FO3 on release and now it's bug-free for all intents and purposes.
avatar
darthspudius: Well my experience on both, that is not true. Fallout 3 was buggy, New Vegas was crash crash crash. Walk through a door, Crash. Open up your inventory, crash. It was very bad for a good month.
Since I have a 8-core CPU, FO3 was freeze, freeze, freeze. Play 5 minutes, system freeze. See FO3 doesn't support any system with more than 2 core CPUs. That has never been fixed by Bethesda, though I managed to fix it with third party solutions. FO3 not only freezes the system, but demands GFWL, which again Bethesda never patched out, so again I had to turn to a third party solution. FO3 doesn't have official Windows 7 support, let alone Windows 8 or Windows 10, though it can be tweaked to run on those systems. It's a Vista game only as far as Bethesda is concerned.

FO:NV is at this moment very much playable, with only the Obsidian patches without any major bugs. With third party bugs, it's practically bug free and never crashes so that's perhaps something with your system. The game is fine, I don't particularly care how it was at release, I didn't play it then.

FO3 however is still a mess on modern systems and freezes constantly the way Bethesda left it, while FO:NV has some gameplay glitches the way Obsidian left it, but is very much playable on modern systems.

I know of your bizarre hatred for Obsidian, so I'll just leave it there. People can try these games for themselves and see, but for me it took far more effort to get FO3 to be even playable on a modern system than FO:NV, but in the end both can be made to be pretty much flawless (though graphic bugs in Point Lookout DLC of FO3 are quite atrocious even today, the graphics fall apart when going to a lookout point and gazing over the ocean, ironically)
avatar
Tauto: Correct.
avatar
darthspudius: Neat, I have added it to my list of things to do haha.
Also,pickup some great mods at Nexus but must be compatible with TTW.
https://taleoftwowastelands.com/forums/tale-two-wastelands-converted-mods
Post edited October 04, 2015 by Tauto
avatar
darthspudius: Well my experience on both, that is not true. Fallout 3 was buggy, New Vegas was crash crash crash. Walk through a door, Crash. Open up your inventory, crash. It was very bad for a good month.
avatar
Atlantico: Since I have a 8-core CPU, FO3 was freeze, freeze, freeze. Play 5 minutes, system freeze. See FO3 doesn't support any system with more than 2 core CPUs. That has never been fixed by Bethesda, though I managed to fix it with third party solutions. FO3 not only freezes the system, but demands GFWL, which again Bethesda never patched out, so again I had to turn to a third party solution. FO3 doesn't have official Windows 7 support, let alone Windows 8 or Windows 10, though it can be tweaked to run on those systems. It's a Vista game only as far as Bethesda is concerned.

FO:NV is at this moment very much playable, with only the Obsidian patches without any major bugs. With third party bugs, it's practically bug free and never crashes so that's perhaps something with your system. The game is fine, I don't particularly care how it was at release, I didn't play it then.

FO3 however is still a mess on modern systems and freezes constantly the way Bethesda left it, while FO:NV has some gameplay glitches the way Obsidian left it, but is very much playable on modern systems.

I know of your bizarre hatred for Obsidian, so I'll just leave it there. People can try these games for themselves and see, but for me it took far more effort to get FO3 to be even playable on a modern system than FO:NV, but in the end both can be made to be pretty much flawless (though graphic bugs in Point Lookout DLC of FO3 are quite atrocious even today, the graphics fall apart when going to a lookout point and gazing over the ocean, ironically)
ha I knew you'd write a super long irrelevant post. I don't have a bizarre hatred. I have had endless negative experiences as a buyer. All I do is voice my opinion. Just because fan boys don't like me dissing their precious, does not mean my opinion is bizarre. Also you never ever reference the times I have complimented their creativity, not once.

But I will bow to your superior intellect since you very clearly know all. Yes master.
avatar
darthspudius: Neat, I have added it to my list of things to do haha.
avatar
Tauto: Also,pickup some great mods at Nexus but must be compatible with TTW.
https://taleoftwowastelands.com/forums/tale-two-wastelands-converted-mods
Hopefully they have those cool weather mods. Use to have a great one that turns the sand paler and made it snow. Made things look much nicer on the eyes.
Post edited October 04, 2015 by darthspudius
I'm very much looking forward to playing this, as I'm currently doing a run through Fallout 3 and having a blast. And from all I've read, FO:NV is pretty much hands down a better game. So, yeah, once I finish FO3, I may jump right into this one.
avatar
GR00T: I'm very much looking forward to playing this, as I'm currently doing a run through Fallout 3 and having a blast. And from all I've read, FO:NV is pretty much hands down a better game. So, yeah, once I finish FO3, I may jump right into this one.
Just think of it as a giant expansion pack. It plays more or less the same with a couple of extra (almost useless) features. Though if you spend a lot of time in FO3, just take notice that New Vegas quests have waaay more "Go talk to <name>" "Can you go back to talk to <name>" "Go back to that <name> again and tell him yes/no".
I beat the vanilla game on the 360 a couple months ago, and only had 3 loading screen crashes and some minor npc glitches in over 100 hours of play, so yeah it's a lot more stable now (unless you try to play it on the PS3 lol)
avatar
GR00T: I'm very much looking forward to playing this, as I'm currently doing a run through Fallout 3 and having a blast. And from all I've read, FO:NV is pretty much hands down a better game. So, yeah, once I finish FO3, I may jump right into this one.
I hope that will work for you. The impression I got is that people disappointed in F3 found comfort in F:NV. I am not sure I ever heard of anyone loving them both as much (while I agree those guys wouldn't have any concern to voice, thus no nothing to complain about) on this subject).
avatar
darthspudius: Just think of it as a giant expansion pack. It plays more or less the same with a couple of extra (almost useless) features. Though if you spend a lot of time in FO3, just take notice that New Vegas quests have waaay more "Go talk to <name>" "Can you go back to talk to <name>" "Go back to that <name> again and tell him yes/no".
I don't mind that as long as there's a reason to do so (instead of just filler to make the quest chain long).

avatar
Potzato: I hope that will work for you. The impression I got is that people disappointed in F3 found comfort in F:NV. I am not sure I ever heard of anyone loving them both as much (while I agree those guys wouldn't have any concern to voice, thus no nothing to complain about) on this subject).
Well, I'm pretty easy to please, so I'll probably at least be satisfied with it if nothing else.
avatar
darthspudius: Just think of it as a giant expansion pack. It plays more or less the same with a couple of extra (almost useless) features. Though if you spend a lot of time in FO3, just take notice that New Vegas quests have waaay more "Go talk to <name>" "Can you go back to talk to <name>" "Go back to that <name> again and tell him yes/no".
avatar
GR00T: I don't mind that as long as there's a reason to do so (instead of just filler to make the quest chain long).

avatar
Potzato: I hope that will work for you. The impression I got is that people disappointed in F3 found comfort in F:NV. I am not sure I ever heard of anyone loving them both as much (while I agree those guys wouldn't have any concern to voice, thus no nothing to complain about) on this subject).
avatar
GR00T: Well, I'm pretty easy to please, so I'll probably at least be satisfied with it if nothing else.
Well they are main quests, but it is really just the same thing with different characters. Apparently it is good story. I thought the side quests were more interesting. Some good vaults to see etc. Oh and the group of aliens. :D
avatar
GR00T: I'm very much looking forward to playing this, as I'm currently doing a run through Fallout 3 and having a blast. And from all I've read, FO:NV is pretty much hands down a better game. So, yeah, once I finish FO3, I may jump right into this one.
avatar
Potzato: I hope that will work for you. The impression I got is that people disappointed in F3 found comfort in F:NV. I am not sure I ever heard of anyone loving them both as much (while I agree those guys wouldn't have any concern to voice, thus no nothing to complain about) on this subject).
Equal love for me and much better with mods and TTW.
avatar
GR00T: Well, I'm pretty easy to please, so I'll probably at least be satisfied with it if nothing else.
That's what she said. (Sorry, had to.) :p
avatar
GR00T: Well, I'm pretty easy to please, so I'll probably at least be satisfied with it if nothing else.
avatar
pimpmonkey2382.313: That's what she said. (Sorry, had to.) :p
OH!!! Derailed! lol You silly sod.