What the crap, my previous post (before the one wondering about invisible posts) appears to have been eaten. What I was saying more or less:
supplementscene: Why exactly are you taking the exact same interpretation as RWarehall and defending ZFR to the hilt? Why is ZFR beyond reproach from both RWarehall's and Ashwald's perspectives? Why would Ashwald himself not suspect ZFR?
dedoporno: I have one pretty good guess why. Except there I am in my introductory analysis mega-post, parts 2, 3 and 5, wondering whether ZFR is facsist/Hitler. Totally not suspecting him at all at the time, sure.
Lifthrasil: ... and you really think that was a real admission and not just cynicism? Then what about Greeks admission of being Hitler? Did you take that to be literal too?
dedoporno: To be honest, I'd love to see that ending up being true. One more pro-Greek reason for me :D
Fascist much? ;)
ZFR: In post 1272 you did mention that what changed your mind was thinking it's "very very unlikely" random.org would have picked the names it and you find it suspicious.
So far, so good. The above is just a reminder of the background situation. But let's look at post 1272 more closely.
_ You quoted Brasas's post 1260, and said it's a very good point against me.
_ Later you said you didn't notice me mentioning I used random.org. That the ".org" slipped your mind. (I found it odd, but after all it was a lot of posts for you to read, maybe you did miss it...)
But Brasas's post 1260 doesn't mention ".org" either. It just says 'randomly'. It doesn't mention ".org". It mentions digital dice.
Brasas: PS: In case anyone has forgotten I am referring to ZFR's explanation for the names in his shitpost. He said he drew them randomly... those digital dice were amazing seers.
Digital dice. What I had in my head up until then was multiple mentions of random, random. That made me go back in the thread to see wtf he was going on about and reread your 479 post where you tell Brasas you used random.org.