SirPrimalform: Month-day-year for numerical dates always struck me as completely insane.
Lazarus_03: For me, it's more of a direct conversion: 'date → word'.
For example:
09/19/2019 I read it as: <
month>/<
number>/<
number>
If someone were to ask the date, the usual response would be in the 'MM/DD' format.
If I am to read it directly, my response would be:
•••
09/19/2019•••
***September/nineteen/twenty'nineteen***
"The date is
September 19, 2019"
As oppose to:
•••
19-09-2019•••
***nineteen-September-twenty'nineteen***
"The date is
19 September 2019"
I guess that's another difference. Here, the verbal date would be "the nineteenth of September, twenty-nineteen". But even accepting that you speak it with the day after the month, it still strikes me as crazy to put the day in between two larger values in the numerical date.
As dtgreene pointed out, mm-dd makes sense. It's just that if you add the year onto the end instead of the beginning, all that sense goes out of the window.
Even though I think the ISO date makes numerical sense, I would read it out as above. Same for 24-hour time, it's very common to use the 24-hour clock here, but I've never heard anyone say 16:30 as anything but "half (past) four". I guess I'm used to a disconnect between the written form and the verbal form.
idbeholdME: Similar problem with numbers (long scale vs short scale). But this problem is not as easily solved like the dates.
As a EU person, whenever I see a billion for example, I am always left wondering if it is actually a billion or a milliard.
The UK adopted short scale before I was born, so I grew up with it entirely. Nonetheless, I think long scale actually makes more sense.